The number of articles that have hit the front page which were generated entirely by AI has risen notably within the last two years.

I, personally, do not want to read long-form that could have (possibly) been a high-quality Twitter post. I don't think I'm alone in thinking this given how often this sentiment comes up in the comments for these articles.

Hacker News is one of the few remaining places on the internet that values long-form content and high-quality discussion. Time is finite, and I don't appreciate these vapid articles stealing from it.

Simply put: titles for these submissions should be altered if enough users report that it is entirely AI generated AND evidence is provided to back that claim. No AI detector is fully accurate in isolation, but multiple detectors agreeing that an LLM wrote a thing makes up for that, in my opinion.