Abstract:Collaboration is the defining mode of modern science, yet its core mechanism -- feedback -- remains hard to observe, difficult to scale, and unequally distributed. Here we test whether large language models (LLMs) can contribute to this hidden but vital practice and reallocate scientific feedback, an essential yet scarce resource for knowledge production. In a global large-scale randomized field experiment, we delivered customized LLM-generated feedback for over 31,000 arXiv preprints across 150 fields and more than 45,000 researchers from 133 geographic regions. Relative to controls, authors who received feedback had a significantly higher likelihood of revising their manuscripts, corresponding to a 12.55% relative increase over the baseline revision rate. Exposure to AI feedback also increased authors' subsequent use of LLM tools in their future papers, suggesting longer-run shifts in scientific practice. These effects were strongest among authors from non-English-dominant research regions, manuscripts less embedded in the scholarly literature, and teams with lower h-indexes and earlier career stages, consistent with the idea that AI feedback may provide the greatest benefit where access to timely critique is otherwise limited. Together, these findings provide causal evidence that structured AI-based interventions can transform access to scientific feedback from a largely private advantage into a more widely distributed resource, with broader implications for productivity, equity, and capacity across the global research system.
| Subjects: | Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.24180 [physics.soc-ph] |
| (or arXiv:2605.24180v1 [physics.soc-ph] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.24180 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
From: Binglu Wang [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 22 May 2026 20:06:17 UTC (702 KB)
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。