Instruction-based image editing has advanced rapidly, yet reliable and interpretable evaluation remains a bottleneck. Current protocols either (i) depend on paired reference images, resulting in limited coverage and inheriting biases from prior generative models or (ii) rely solely on zero-shot vision language models (VLMs), whose prompt-based assessments of instruction following, content consistency, and visual quality are often imprecise. To address this, we introduce EdiVal, an automated and fine-grained evaluation framework grounded in an object-centric perspective, designed to assess not only standard single-turn but also multi-turn instruction-based editing with precision. Given an input image, EdiVal first decomposes it into semantically meaningful objects, then synthesizes diverse, context-aware editing instructions while dynamically updating object pools across turns. These two stages enable two novel object centric metrics tailored for multi turn evaluation and one global metric of visual quality: 1) EdiVal-IF, which measures instruction following by combining open vocabulary object detectors for symbolic checks with VLMs for semantic verification on detector guided crops; 2) EdiVal-CC, which evaluates content consistency by calculating semantic similarity of unchanged objects and background using the evolving object pools; and 3) EdiVal-VQ, which quantifies changes in overall visual quality with human preference models. Instantiating this pipeline, we build EdiVal Bench, a multi-turn editing benchmark covering 9 instruction types and 16 state-of-the-art editing models, spanning in-context, flow-matching, and diffusion paradigms. We demonstrate that EdiVal can be used to identify existing failure modes, thereby informing the development of the next generation of editing models.