惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

罗磊的独立博客
U
Unit 42
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
腾讯CDC
小众软件
小众软件
V
Visual Studio Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
博客园 - 叶小钗
GbyAI
GbyAI
爱范儿
爱范儿
雷峰网
雷峰网
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
博客园_首页
D
Docker
A
About on SuperTechFans
G
Google Developers Blog
I
InfoQ
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
V
V2EX
博客园 - Franky

cs.AI updates on arXiv.org

Policy Split: Incentivizing Dual-Mode Exploration in LLM Reinforcement with Dual-Mode Entropy Regularization METER: Evaluating Multi-Level Contextual Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models Think Before you Write: QA-Guided Reasoning for Character Descriptions in Books METRO: Towards Strategy Induction from Expert Dialogue Transcripts for Non-collaborative Dialogues Retrieval as Generation: A Unified Framework with Self-Triggered Information Planning Do LLMs Know Tool Irrelevance? Demystifying Structural Alignment Bias in Tool Invocations Enhancing Multimodal Large Language Models for Ancient Chinese Character Evolution Analysis via Glyph-Driven Fine-Tuning Exploring Knowledge Conflicts for Faithful LLM Reasoning: Benchmark and Method CocoaBench: Evaluating Unified Digital Agents in the Wild MathAgent: Adversarial Evolution of Constraint Graphs for Mathematical Reasoning Data Synthesis Efficient Training for Cross-lingual Speech Language Models Shared Emotion Geometry Across Small Language Models: A Cross-Architecture Study of Representation, Behavior, and Methodological Confounds A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of Persona Steering on LLM Capabilities Uncertainty-Aware Web-Conditioned Scientific Fact-Checking When Valid Signals Fail: Regime Boundaries Between LLM Features and RL Trading Policies When Verification Fails: How Compositionally Infeasible Claims Escape Rejection Mem$^2$Evolve: Towards Self-Evolving Agents via Co-Evolutionary Capability Expansion and Experience Distillation AOP-Smart: A RAG-Enhanced Large Language Model Framework for Adverse Outcome Pathway Analysis Advancing Polish Language Modeling through Tokenizer Optimization in the Bielik v3 7B and 11B Series TInR: Exploring Tool-Internalized Reasoning in Large Language Models Do BERT Embeddings Encode Narrative Dimensions? A Token-Level Probing Analysis of Time, Space, Causality, and Character in Fiction Generating Multiple-Choice Knowledge Questions with Interpretable Difficulty Estimation using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models Deep-Reporter: Deep Research for Grounded Multimodal Long-Form Generation Too Nice to Tell the Truth: Quantifying Agreeableness-Driven Sycophancy in Role-Playing Language Models Learning and Enforcing Context-Sensitive Control for LLMs Efficient Process Reward Modeling via Contrastive Mutual Information Computational Lesions in Multilingual Language Models Separate Shared and Language-specific Brain Alignment Bridging Linguistic Gaps: Cross-Lingual Mapping in Pre-Training and Dataset for Enhanced Multilingual LLM Performance Early Decisions Matter: Proximity Bias and Initial Trajectory Shaping in Non-Autoregressive Diffusion Language Models LLMs Should Incorporate Explicit Mechanisms for Human Empathy
Emotional Cost Functions for AI Safety: Teaching Agents t...
Pandurang Mopgar · 2026-03-16 · via cs.AI updates on arXiv.org

Humans learn from catastrophic mistakes not through numerical penalties, but through qualitative suffering that reshapes who they are. Current AI safety approaches replicate none of this. Reward shaping captures magnitude, not meaning. Rule-based alignment constrains behaviour, but does not change it. We propose Emotional Cost Functions, a framework in which agents develop Qualitative Suffering States, rich narrative representations of irreversible consequences that persist forward and actively reshape character. Unlike numerical penalties, qualitative suffering states capture the meaning of what was lost, the specific void it creates, and how it changes the agent's relationship to similar future situations. Our four-component architecture - Consequence Processor, Character State, Anticipatory Scan, and Story Update is grounded in one principle. Actions cannot be undone and agents must live with what they have caused. Anticipatory dread operates through two pathways. Experiential dread arises from the agent's own lived consequences. Pre-experiential dread is acquired without direct experience, through training or inter-agent transmission. Together they mirror how human wisdom accumulates across experience and culture. Ten experiments across financial trading, crisis support, and content moderation show that qualitative suffering produces specific wisdom rather than generalised paralysis. Agents correctly engage with moderate opportunities at 90-100% while numerical baselines over-refuse at 90%. Architecture ablation confirms the mechanism is necessary. The full system generates ten personal grounding phrases per probe vs. zero for a vanilla LLM. Statistical validation (N=10) confirms reproducibility at 80-100% consistency.