Criminal networks, such as the Sicilian Mafia, pose substantial threats to public safety, national security, and economic stability. Outdated disruption methods with a focus on removing influential individuals or key players have proven ineffective due to the covertness of the network. Thus, researchers have been trying to apply Social Network Analysis (SNA) techniques, such as centrality-based measures, to identify key players. However, removing individuals with high centrality often proves to be inefficient, as it does not mimic the real-world scenarios that Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) face. For instance, the operational costs limit the LEAs from exploiting the results of the centrality-based methods. This study proposes a multi-objective optimisation framework like the Weighted Sum Genetic Algorithm (WS-GA) and the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to identify disruption strategies that balance two conflicting goals, maximising fragmentation and minimising operational cost which is captured by the spatial distance between nodes and the nearest LEA headquarters. The study utilises the "Montagna Operation" dataset for the experiments. The results demonstrate that although centrality-based approaches can fragment network effectively, they tend to incur higher operational costs. In contrast, the proposed algorithms achieve comparable disruption outcomes with significantly lower operational costs. The contribution of this work lies in incorporating operational costs in a form of spatial distance constraints into disruption strategy, which has been largely overlooked in prior studies. This research offers a scalable multi-objective capability that improves practical application of SNA in guiding LEAs in disrupting criminal networks more efficiently and strategically.