惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
G
Google Developers Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
D
DataBreaches.Net
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
爱范儿
爱范儿
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
I
InfoQ
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
V
V2EX
B
Blog
罗磊的独立博客
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

cs.AI updates on arXiv.org

Policy Split: Incentivizing Dual-Mode Exploration in LLM Reinforcement with Dual-Mode Entropy Regularization METER: Evaluating Multi-Level Contextual Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models Think Before you Write: QA-Guided Reasoning for Character Descriptions in Books METRO: Towards Strategy Induction from Expert Dialogue Transcripts for Non-collaborative Dialogues Retrieval as Generation: A Unified Framework with Self-Triggered Information Planning Do LLMs Know Tool Irrelevance? Demystifying Structural Alignment Bias in Tool Invocations Enhancing Multimodal Large Language Models for Ancient Chinese Character Evolution Analysis via Glyph-Driven Fine-Tuning Exploring Knowledge Conflicts for Faithful LLM Reasoning: Benchmark and Method CocoaBench: Evaluating Unified Digital Agents in the Wild MathAgent: Adversarial Evolution of Constraint Graphs for Mathematical Reasoning Data Synthesis Efficient Training for Cross-lingual Speech Language Models Shared Emotion Geometry Across Small Language Models: A Cross-Architecture Study of Representation, Behavior, and Methodological Confounds A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of Persona Steering on LLM Capabilities Uncertainty-Aware Web-Conditioned Scientific Fact-Checking When Valid Signals Fail: Regime Boundaries Between LLM Features and RL Trading Policies When Verification Fails: How Compositionally Infeasible Claims Escape Rejection Mem$^2$Evolve: Towards Self-Evolving Agents via Co-Evolutionary Capability Expansion and Experience Distillation AOP-Smart: A RAG-Enhanced Large Language Model Framework for Adverse Outcome Pathway Analysis Advancing Polish Language Modeling through Tokenizer Optimization in the Bielik v3 7B and 11B Series TInR: Exploring Tool-Internalized Reasoning in Large Language Models Do BERT Embeddings Encode Narrative Dimensions? A Token-Level Probing Analysis of Time, Space, Causality, and Character in Fiction Generating Multiple-Choice Knowledge Questions with Interpretable Difficulty Estimation using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models Deep-Reporter: Deep Research for Grounded Multimodal Long-Form Generation Too Nice to Tell the Truth: Quantifying Agreeableness-Driven Sycophancy in Role-Playing Language Models Learning and Enforcing Context-Sensitive Control for LLMs Efficient Process Reward Modeling via Contrastive Mutual Information Computational Lesions in Multilingual Language Models Separate Shared and Language-specific Brain Alignment Bridging Linguistic Gaps: Cross-Lingual Mapping in Pre-Training and Dataset for Enhanced Multilingual LLM Performance Early Decisions Matter: Proximity Bias and Initial Trajectory Shaping in Non-Autoregressive Diffusion Language Models LLMs Should Incorporate Explicit Mechanisms for Human Empathy
The Metanym Game: A Self-Contained, Self-Consistent LLM P...
[Submitted on 19 Jun 2026] · 2026-06-23 · via cs.AI updates on arXiv.org

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.21008 (cs)

[Submitted on 19 Jun 2026]

View PDF

Abstract:The metanym game is a competitive word game for LLMs that measures structural intelligence against established cognitive-science constructs. No content is given in advance; the contestants create all of it -- a new kind of analogy test, analogical production falsifiable sentence by sentence, with no fixed test set to leak into training (contamination-resistant by construction). In the council-of-peers benchmark, the contestants also rate each other's creations. We introduce the first spectral solution, to our knowledge, to the wicked problem of benchmarking LLMs' factual accuracy without golden keys or oracle models: one singular value decomposition of the evaluators' ratings matrix yields their competence as both generators and judges of true statements at once. Competence on the subjective criteria comes from each judge's rating consistency as the yardstick shifts. The factual rating correlates with GPQA Diamond at Pearson r = 0.92. Scored separately, making and judging dissociate -- judging is the scarcer skill: the strongest generators are middling judges, the sharpest judge a mid-pack generator. To scale, the strongest players form a council that does the official benchmarking; its seats are contestable -- a stronger model earns one on the benchmark's own rating. The benchmark is entirely self-contained and self-consistent, a stable gauge over time.
Comments: 78 pages (main text + four appendices: full generation/evaluation prompts, the anchor submission, and a complete worked council-evaluation example), 1 figure, 13 tables
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: I.2.7; I.2.6
Cite as: arXiv:2606.21008 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.21008v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.21008

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: David Nordfors [view email]
[v1] Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:43:29 UTC (2,651 KB)

Current browse context:

cs.CL

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

Demos

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.