惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

罗磊的独立博客
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
C
Check Point Blog
博客园_首页
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
博客园 - 司徒正美
P
Privacy International News Feed
G
Google Developers Blog
I
Intezer
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
博客园 - 聂微东
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
K
Kaspersky official blog
I
InfoQ
Y
Y Combinator Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
D
Docker
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
W
WeLiveSecurity
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
量子位
H
Hacker News: Front Page
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
S
Security Affairs
Latest news
Latest news
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
S
Security Archives - TechRepublic
V
Visual Studio Blog
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
S
Secure Thoughts
F
Fortinet All Blogs
V
V2EX
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
J
Java Code Geeks
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO

博客园 - Bo Schwarzstein

发布关于PostGIS对于USD格式的拓展 紫微斗数之自化禄真的是损耗嘛? 紫微斗数个人经验之三合或者四化看哪个 A Practical Methodology, HSM, Handler,Service,Model, for Golang Backend Development 问ChatGPT玄学问题,看来命理师还是不会被取代的 Compile Sqlite3 Executable, Static Library, and Shared Library on Linux Benchmark JuiceFS on AWS 1 Work with AWS VPC, Lambda and Internet Far & Unifield Field Augmented Reality 紫微斗数是否对外国人有用 Create CloudFront Signed URL in 1 Minute 2022壬寅年天干四化 《中有成就秘笈》之中央密严刹土 IPFS与般若文海 Moira果老星宗七政四余排盘软件下载 Play Old Diablo 2 on macOS Catalina Use Go Micro Web with HTTP Handler 视频平台设计思路大灌顶 Unity Input System教程
Benchmark JuiceFS at AWS 2
Bo Schwarzstein · 2022-12-23 · via 博客园 - Bo Schwarzstein

Deployed JuiceFS to self-managed K3s cluster with mountOptions

- cache-size=0

to disable any cache.

Use t3a.medium to do the test.

Sequential Read 512M 1 Job

# fio --name=sequential-read --directory=. --rw=read --refill_buffers --bs=4M --size=512M

sequential-read: (g=0): rw=read, bs=(R) 4096KiB-4096KiB, (W) 4096KiB-4096KiB, (T) 4096KiB-4096KiB, ioengine=psync, iodepth=1
fio-3.7
Starting 1 process
sequential-read: Laying out IO file (1 file / 512MiB)
Jobs: 1 (f=1)
sequential-read: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=181: Fri Dec 23 04:35:19 2022
read: IOPS=60, BW=241MiB/s (252MB/s)(512MiB/2127msec)
clat (usec): min=3663, max=98850, avg=16572.69, stdev=21702.62
lat (usec): min=3664, max=98851, avg=16576.32, stdev=21702.17
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 3687], 5.00th=[ 3982], 10.00th=[ 4047], 20.00th=[ 4490],
| 30.00th=[ 4817], 40.00th=[ 5211], 50.00th=[ 6325], 60.00th=[ 8291],
| 70.00th=[10290], 80.00th=[19268], 90.00th=[59507], 95.00th=[67634],
| 99.00th=[84411], 99.50th=[99091], 99.90th=[99091], 99.95th=[99091],
| 99.99th=[99091]
bw ( KiB/s): min=196608, max=294912, per=96.34%, avg=237465.75, stdev=45953.47, samples=4
iops : min= 48, max= 72, avg=57.75, stdev=11.44, samples=4
lat (msec) : 4=5.47%, 10=64.06%, 20=10.94%, 50=7.03%, 100=12.50%
cpu : usr=0.00%, sys=10.87%, ctx=2506, majf=0, minf=1033
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued rwts: total=128,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: bw=241MiB/s (252MB/s), 241MiB/s-241MiB/s (252MB/s-252MB/s), io=512MiB (537MB), run=2127-2127msec

Sequential Write 512M 1 Job

# fio --name=sequential-write --directory=. --rw=write --refill_buffers --bs=4M --size=512M

equential-write: (g=0): rw=write, bs=(R) 4096KiB-4096KiB, (W) 4096KiB-4096KiB, (T) 4096KiB-4096KiB, ioengine=psync, iodepth=1
fio-3.7
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [W(1)][-.-%][r=0KiB/s,w=187MiB/s][r=0,w=46 IOPS][eta 00m:00s]
sequential-read: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=187: Fri Dec 23 04:35:46 2022
write: IOPS=48, BW=194MiB/s (203MB/s)(512MiB/2641msec)
clat (usec): min=3425, max=60858, avg=15901.72, stdev=13752.35
lat (usec): min=3426, max=60859, avg=15903.28, stdev=13752.38
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 3425], 5.00th=[ 3654], 10.00th=[ 3851], 20.00th=[ 4359],
| 30.00th=[ 5211], 40.00th=[ 6652], 50.00th=[11207], 60.00th=[17433],
| 70.00th=[20841], 80.00th=[25297], 90.00th=[33162], 95.00th=[44827],
| 99.00th=[57410], 99.50th=[61080], 99.90th=[61080], 99.95th=[61080],
| 99.99th=[61080]
bw ( KiB/s): min=180224, max=204800, per=98.17%, avg=194891.00, stdev=8957.65, samples=5
iops : min= 44, max= 50, avg=47.40, stdev= 2.19, samples=5
lat (msec) : 4=13.28%, 10=35.16%, 20=17.97%, 50=29.69%, 100=3.91%
cpu : usr=5.80%, sys=14.62%, ctx=4628, majf=0, minf=10
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued rwts: total=0,128,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: bw=194MiB/s (203MB/s), 194MiB/s-194MiB/s (203MB/s-203MB/s), io=512MiB (537MB), run=2641-2641msec

The performance is quite promising.