惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

腾讯CDC
IT之家
IT之家
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
The Cloudflare Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
博客园 - 【当耐特】
V
V2EX
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
H
Help Net Security
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
F
Fortinet All Blogs
I
InfoQ
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
A
About on SuperTechFans
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
B
Blog

Privacy International News Feed

The Play That Taught Garissa Its Rights Lack of transparency and national guidelines mark the expansion of facial recognition in brazilian education The new space race is already a war race Humanless Resources? Uncovering AI recruitment software PI’s submission to the UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries Collateral Damage: Claude Mythos and the Privacy Risks of AI Key highlights of our 2026 results by season World Food Programme expand Palantir partnership Time to address the human rights implications of AI in the military domain Bad Vibes: AI coding tools and privacy issues How New EU Access to Documents Rules Can Reduce Transparency and Shield Big Tech Privacy International’s submission to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on the protection of human rights defenders in the digital age Collateral Damage: Grok AI and the Human Cost of Generative AI From Big Oil to Big Algorithm: Public Money in Private Models Dual-use tech: the BAE Systems example Dual-use tech: the Lockheed Martin example Voter Disenfranchisement: A Privacy Issue What is digital fingerprinting: Is my device ever truly anonymous? Moving Goalposts: Football, Facial Recognition and the Expansion of Surveillance Dangerous data The ILO Convention on decent work in the platform economy Challenging the militarisation of tech: a visual explainer Are IP addresses personal data? PI seeks to inform inquiry of UK Joint Committee on Human Rights on human rights and AI Transparency and explainability for algorithmic decisions at work Our key achievements from 2025 Joint Statement on New Finnish Social Welfare Laws’ Human Rights Implications Privacy International’s remarks at the side event of the 61st Session of the UN Human Rights Council on the Human Rights Impacts of Using Artificial Intelligence in Countering Terrorism What does it mean when Big Tech goes to war? Privacy International & Women on Web - Securing Reproductive Justice: A Guide to Digital Privacy for Sexual and Reproductive Justice Activists
When algorithms go to war
staff · 2026-06-29 · via Privacy International News Feed

In our report, PAX and Privacy International examine the rapid militarisation of data-intensive technologies and the deepening of convergence between tech giants and arms producers. Amid booming military budgets and unprecedented investment in artificial intelligence, we document how some of the world’s largest technology companies have become key suppliers to the military, while traditional arms producers race to build increasingly autonomous weapons — two once-distinct sectors that are now fusing.

Through an overview of military contracts, we examine some of the companies driving this shift: the computing-hardware producers whose chips and networks underpin modern warfare (AMD, Cisco, IBM and Nvidia); the tech giants supplying cloud services, software and generative AI (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle and SpaceX); the venture-backed “neo-primes” Anduril and Palantir; and the world’s five largest arms producers (BAE Systems, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and RTX). We also look briefly at China, the only other state with comparable capacity. The selection is deliberately weighted towards the biggest players and is, by design, not exhaustive.

Across these profiles, we trace a set of shared concerns: the spread of AI decision-support systems that compress the kill chain and weaken meaningful human control; the erosion of companies’ own ethical commitments; and a dangerous concentration of power in a handful of firms with unusually close ties to government. We argue that these developments are outpacing the rules meant to govern them and make the case—to states and companies alike—for binding international rules, grounded in international humanitarian law and international human rights law, covering AI in the military domain, and corporate accountability.

Download the report's executive summary.

Download the full report.