惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

G
GRAHAM CLULEY
T
Tenable Blog
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
P
Privacy International News Feed
S
Security Affairs
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
O
OpenAI News
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
S
Schneier on Security
G
Google Developers Blog
V
V2EX
C
Check Point Blog
U
Unit 42
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
T
Threatpost
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
S
Secure Thoughts
博客园 - 司徒正美
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
K
Kaspersky official blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
AI
AI
博客园 - 聂微东
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
Project Zero
Project Zero
W
WeLiveSecurity
博客园 - Franky

Creative Good

Changing the address of this RSS feed Protecting elders and kids from predatory tech The garbage on our screens How it’s going in tech – without ethics AI isn’t meant for us Starlink bestows, or forces, the digital age on an Amazonian tribe Microsoft Recall should make you consider Linux Google goes bananums for AI Creative Good: Apple made a terrible mistake: it told the truth To resist the robots, get a typewriter Big Tech’s corruption was 25 years in the making Creative Good: China and TikTok Surviving the customer experience winter The gaping void in San Francisco, New York, and Cambridge Vision Pro, unscrambled, is “I Poison VR” Resisting Silicon Valley’s cult of “more” The airplane blowout came from our rotten Big Tech economy Creative Good: Instagram’s unmentionable problem Marc Andreessen is right – love doesn’t scale Facial recognition and the end of privacy – with Kashmir Hill The Luddites warned us about Google Celebrating 25 years of this newsletter – and an announcement Creative Good: Surveillance spreading Disaster alerts reveal a better way to design tech Don’t throw technology at it Creative Good: AI is spackle Hacks of the ultra-rich, as revealed by Bruce Schneier and Josh O'Kane Why car companies (still) ignore customers A walk around world raises questions about tech Three things you should listen to An addiction machine for our age Rejecting the Apple Vision Pro What you missed about Google and Amazon Why customers don’t want chat bots The giant brain suck of 2023 My 26-hour delay on Delta Air Lines Is AI a demon or what Creative Good: AI plus whatever ChatGPT’s dangers are starting to show Creative Good: A Simple Desultory Techtonic A picture of the future Where are the customers' chats? Sassy AIs are not the problem AI is creating the Play-Doh internet Who’s responsible for fixing tech? How Google profits from criminal activity ChatGPT’s drawbacks, and how to respond A new year to make tech better A few more inspiring people Why we can’t trust Apple Bonfire of the vanity project As cities embrace surveillance, we can resist A future for people doing good work A Halloween update on Big Tech Creative Good: Moralists, unite Creative Good: A song about surveillance AI is already turning against you. We can fix it. Waking up to the genetic surveillance state another reason to join Creative Good Creative Good: A most welcome decline An “internet for the people” or a plastic beach Our last chance in tech Jennifer Egan and a Forum update Creative Good: Citizenship and smartphones Celebrating one year of the Creative Good community Creative Good Forum Walking away from tech Where to go after Twitter An alternative to Amazon, and avoiding data brokers God, death, and tech with Sasha Stiles The web as monopolized surveillance space Human rights and digital spycraft Designing for deceit in Silicon Valley Bandcamp risks becoming an Epic failure The restart of history Why to resist Amazon by cancelling your Prime account Concentration of power is the problem We said ‘never again.’ Now look at Xinjiang Facebook patents and the comet in Don’t Look Up I founded Creative Good 25 years ago today – and learned a few things Are Facebook and Google criminal enterprises? My predictions for Apple’s smart glasses Creative Good Forum The banality of tech Big questions, answered by Big Tech Smiling in the metaverse Big Tech’s latest misbehavior calls for action Facebook’s laughable response to the whistleblower Get your community organization off of Facebook. Now. Voice surveillance must die The fall of Facebook Why we might transform computers into ‘tiles’ Explaining the last 20 years What to do when the storm arrives Public libraries are better than Google WeWork and waste How to prove vaccine status – with privacy We can’t trust tech, from A(pple) to Z(oom) On resisting emperors and their delusions Cameras and con games: Silicon Valley’s demented fun house
Creative Good: A “what now?” moment
2022-08-05 · via Creative Good

A “what now?” moment

If Congress can’t fight Big Tech, what do we do?
By Mark Hurst • August 5, 2022

Greetings from the island of Manhattan. Maybe it’s the haze, heat, and humidity, but I’m feeling reflective in this first week of August. Stepping back, taking stock, especially in light of a very important deadline that quietly passed a few days ago.

You might remember my recent column Our last chance in tech (June 28, 2022), about the climax of a years-long battle between American citizens and the tech monopolies. Democratically elected representatives in the U.S. Congress have been trying to force a change to the unethical, anti-competitive behavior of the Big Tech giants.

A lost chance

Specifically, the column described the antitrust bills in Congress, both with bipartisan support, curbing the corrupt practice of self-preferencing. Google and Apple, for example, would no longer be allowed to tune their app-store algorithms to downgrade potential competitors in search results. (Both bills are described in the column, with links to more info.)

Unsurprisingly, the companies targeted by the bills – Google, Apple, Amazon, and Facebook – mounted a ferocious counterattack: paying lobbyists millions of dollars to discredit the reforms, sending leaders to Capitol Hill (including Apple CEO Tim Cook) to meet with lawmakers, and even promoting a sham advocacy group – see the Politico investigation – that members of Congress called “fraudulent” and an “astroturf campaign.” Yet another example of Silicon Valley drawing on vast amounts of money – and deception – to make its case.

Plenty of lawmakers saw through Big Tech’s scheme. As Senator Amy Klobuchar posted:

But there was a deadline. In order to pass, the bills really needed to come to a vote before the August recess. And that didn’t happen. Chuck Schumer, the senator who could bring the bills to a vote, did nothing – though he did make time for a trip to Seattle (American Prospect, July 11), where Amazon and Microsoft are based. It’s hard to discern what Schumer was thinking, though this New York Post article (July 24) makes an attempt.

Regardless, time finally ran out. The deadline for a vote has now passed. As Axios reported on August 1, Klobuchar said the tech antitrust vote will have to wait. Big Tech’s efforts to protect their monopolies have paid off handsomely. It’s unlikely that Congress will mount another meaningful attempt this fall, when lawmakers will be preoccupied with the upcoming midterm elections. And if, as predicted, there’s a shift in the majority party, there’s not much chance for tech reform in the next few years.

Creative Good is reader-supported.

You’re on a free subscription. If you want to support my writing, the best way is by joining Creative Good.

“What now?”

I discussed our quandary on Techtonic this week. (See playlist, stream or download the show.) The question facing us is: What now? The most powerful companies in history are now firmly in charge of the economy, the media, healthcare, entertainment, transportation, and increasingly – it appears – the political class as well. Now that Congress seems unable to curb Big Tech’s power, we’re left with the question of how to live in a society dominated by this cartel.

The only answer I can come up with is simple but not easy: Top-down didn’t work, so we’ll have to work bottom-up. Our response, both individual and collective, will have to change tacks. Of course, a miracle could occur and Congress could decide to throw off the influence of tech money to fight for democracy and fair markets – but I’m not holding my breath.

We need to change our approach:

• On the individual level, we can choose better tools. My Good Reports site recommends alternatives for search, email, web browser, etc. outside the toxic empires of Silicon Valley and Seattle. And we can minimize our social-media usage, or even delete our accounts. As I wrote last week in A most welcome decline (July 29), there is mounting evidence that social media is measurably harmful to health, especially for younger users. Now is a good time to break up with whatever tools are causing harm, and adopt some better alternatives.

• On the collective level, those of us in the tech industry should be working to build better platforms. Some of this is happening already. Look at the decentralized “fediverse” platforms in fediverse.info (as listed on Good Reports), and you can sense the momentum building for something – anything – other than the default mode of Silicon Valley. Venture-funded companies with a solitary goal of “growth at any cost” will naturally fall into lockstep with the surveillance, manipulation, and exploitation loops pioneered by Google, then adopted by the rest of Big Tech. There’s no reason that the products we use have to all stem from the cartel of sludge factories.

Creative Good is reader-supported.

You’re on a free subscription. If you want to support my writing, the best way is by joining Creative Good.

I ask again: Why does all our digital technology have to come from Silicon Valley? The tech industry should be working to create alternatives that intentionally and explicitly route around the Big Tech giants – in values, and in practice. As Jonathan Crary wrote in his recent book Scorched Earth (featured on the June 27, 2022 Techtonic), drawing on Ivan Illich:

In the early 1970s, the social critic Ivan Illich . . . wrote [that] tools are intrinsically social. . . . “An individual relates himself in action to his society either through the use of tools he actively masters or by which he is passively acted upon.” Illich insisted that people derive happiness and satisfaction through the use of tools that are “least controlled by others,” and warned that “the growth of tools beyond a certain point increases regimentation, dependence, exploitation and impotence.”

Now in August 2022, we find ourselves at the point Illich warned us about. Our tools and platforms are not controlled by us. They’re controlled by companies that have grown too large and have adopted dependence – that is, addiction – and exploitation as their dearest values. We need a change.

P.S. Other regulatory items

While I’m thinking of it, a couple of other regulatory items this week:

Privacy: In the Markup, Julia Angwin writes that the Federal Privacy Law Has Momentum, but There’s a Catch (July 30). At issue is whether a federal privacy law should tamp down on individual states’ efforts at stricter policies (as in California, with the CCPA, and Illinois, with BIPA, its biometric privacy act). Worth keeping an eye on this: Big Tech oligarchs are always saying they support privacy regulation, which really means regulation that they influence. Any draft of a privacy law that is supported by Facebook, Google, and the rest is a guaranteed sludge factory.

Email: As reported in Axios on August 4, the Federal Election Commission has tentatively approved Google’s proposal to keep campaign emails out of spam. Google’s proposal would give Google more power to decide which political emails to send to Gmail’s junk folder, and which to allow into the inbox. The power could expand later to cover emails from other government agencies. Over time, Google would cement its role as gatekeeper over the government’s communications with its citizens – a useful position to occupy, in case the democracy gets uppity again and tries to curb Google’s power. (Yet another reason to get off Gmail and use these alternatives listed on Good Reports.)

This barely scratches the surface of how Big Tech is working tirelessly, even in August, to amass and protect its power. There’s much else we can do, of course. But as a start, choosing and building better tools will give us a fighting chance, now that Congress has apparently failed.

Stay cool, friends. Let’s keep at it.


Post a comment on this column – for Creative Good members only.

Creative Good is reader-supported.

You’re on a free subscription. If you want to support my writing, the best way is by joining Creative Good.

Until next time,

-mark

Mark Hurst, founder, Creative Good – see official announcement and join as a member
Email: mark@creativegood.com
Read my non-toxic tech reviews at Good Reports
Listen to my podcast/radio show: techtonic.fm
Subscribe to my email newsletter
Sign up for my to-do list with privacy built in, Good Todo
Twitter: @markhurst

- – -

LET’S MAKE TECH BETTER: JOIN US.

Mission

Creative Good creates good experiences — for our consulting clients, our Good Todo users, our newsletter readers, and all of our fans.

Contact

Creative Good, 2808 Broadway #17, New York, NY 10025 USA
Phone: +1.646.543.3530
Email: emailus@creativegood.com