a disability aid that is meant to solve a real or perceived problem experienced by disabled people, but which was built without including disabled people in the design process
Because disabled people were not included in the design process, the dongle may not be as practical or as helpful as it might seem. It may be unsafe to use or prohibitively expensive. Its target users may not consider the "problem" it was meant to solve a problem at all.
Media often sensationalizes stories about disability dongles. These stories often exaggerate the dongles' practicality, and are susceptible to forms of inspiration porn. The media attention garned from building a dongle is often a large motivation for building the dongle in the first place.
Creators of disability dongles put the onus of accessibility on disabled individuals, who are expected to buy expensive devices to participate in society in full. Disabled advocates often argue that accessibility is a civil right, and that true access requires making the environment itself accessible through infrastructure.
Some disability dongles have been reinvented several times by different groups, and regularly resurface in the media. Two examples are:
Stair-climbing wheelchairs, which often require unrealistic core strength or which put the user in a precarious angle.
Sign-language gloves, which purport to translate American Sign Language (ASL), or other sign languages, into English. These gloves leave out context conveyed through body language or facial gestures, which are often key elements of sign languages.
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。