惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
Vercel News
Vercel News
A
About on SuperTechFans
G
Google Developers Blog
C
Check Point Blog
腾讯CDC
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
博客园 - 司徒正美
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
D
DataBreaches.Net
博客园_首页
美团技术团队
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
量子位
雷峰网
雷峰网
IT之家
IT之家
小众软件
小众软件
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
H
Help Net Security
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - 叶小钗

MIT CISR

Client Challenge Client Challenge Client Challenge Client Challenge Client Challenge Client Challenge Client Challenge Client Challenge The AI Decision Matrix Designing Decision Rights for AI Decision Rights for AI Predicting Human Behavior with AI Simulations Client Challenge Client Challenge Client Challenge Client Challenge Client Challenge Leveraging Digital Colleagues for Enterprise Value Teaching Case: How to Grow the Salesforce Platform Business? Client Challenge Client Challenge Minimum Viable Governance for Generative AI Client Challenge Business Models in the Agentic AI Era—Session Presentation Client Challenge Managing Digital Colleagues—Session Presentation Hands-on with AI Governance: Designing Adaptive Guardrails—Session Presentation Client Challenge Client Challenge Business Models in the Agentic AI Era—Session Presentation
Designing Decision Rights for AI
By Ina M. Sebastian, et al · 2026-06-17 · via MIT CISR
Abstract

One of the biggest challenges companies face today is designing decision rights between humans and AI. For example, should AI be used in hiring, and if so, for which tasks? Should AI run marketing campaigns end to end, or augment human judgment? We identified two key dimensions—ambiguity and risk—that help determine how humans and AI that can complete tasks autonomously should share decisions. By mapping decisions across these dimensions, companies make explicit what stakes they’re willing to accept and who bears the consequences. As business decisions vary in ambiguity and risk, leaders need to adjust how AI participates in three activities: framing decisions, acting on them, and learning from the outcomes.

© 2026 MIT Center for Information Systems Research, Sebastian, Weill, Haskamp, and Vom Brocke. MIT CISR Research Briefings are published monthly to update the center’s member organizations on current research projects.

MIT CENTER FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH (CISR)

Founded in 1974 and grounded in MIT's tradition of combining academic knowledge and practical purpose, MIT CISR helps executives meet the challenge of leading increasingly digital and data-driven organizations. We work directly with digital leaders, executives, and boards to develop our insights. Our research is funded by member organizations that support our work and participate in our consortium. 

ANZ Banking Group (Australia)

Banco Bradesco S.A. (Brazil)

Commonwealth Superannuation Corp. (Australia)

Cuscal Limited (Australia)

DBS Bank Ltd. (Singapore)

Doosan Corporation (Korea)

Fomento Economico Mexicano, S.A.B., de C.V.

Mater Private Hospital (Ireland)

National Australia Bank Ltd.

Nomura Holdings, Inc. (Japan)

Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. Systems Consulting Division (Japan)

Novo Nordisk A/S (Denmark)

Pentagon Federal Credit Union

Principal Life Insurance Company

Reserve Bank of Australia

Scentre Group Limited (Australia)

Schneider Electric Industries SAS (France)

Telstra Limited (Australia)

Terumo Corporation (Japan)