惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
腾讯CDC
博客园 - 聂微东
爱范儿
爱范儿
罗磊的独立博客
P
Proofpoint News Feed
博客园 - Franky
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Jina AI
Jina AI
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
博客园 - 司徒正美
美团技术团队
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
A
About on SuperTechFans
I
InfoQ
博客园_首页
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
H
Help Net Security
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
G
Google Developers Blog

cs.IT updates on arXiv.org

Theoretical Limits of Language Model Alignment $f$-Divergence Regularized RLHF: Two Tales of Sampling and Unified Analyses A Unified Measure-Theoretic View of Diffusion, Score-Based, and Flow Matching Generative Models When Can Voting Help, Hurt, or Change Course? Exact Structure of Binary Test-Time Aggregation When Semantic Communication Meets Queueing: Cross-Layer Latency and Task Fidelity Optimization Convexity in Disguise: A Theoretical Framework for Nonconvex Low-Rank Matrix Estimation Conditional Diffusion Under Linear Constraints: Langevin Mixing and Information-Theoretic Guarantees Sharp Capacity Thresholds in Linear Associative Memory: From Winner-Take-All to Listwise Retrieval Expert Routing for Communication-Efficient MoE via Finite Expert Banks Contextual Memory-Enhanced Source Coding for Low-SNR Communications Realizable Bayes-Consistency for General Metric Losses Leveraging Code Automorphisms for Improved Syndrome-Based Neural Decoding A Hierarchical Sampling Framework for bounding the Generalization Error of Federated Learning Dueling DDQN-Based Adaptive Multi-Objective Handover Optimization for LEO Satellite Networks The Causal Description Gap: Information-Theoretic Separations Across Pearl's Hierarchy Optimization of CV-QKD Under Practical Constraints Benchmarking Wireless Representations: High-Dimensional vs. Compressed Embeddings for Efficiency and Robustness Real-Time Text Transmission via LLM-Based Entropy Coding over Fixed-Rate Channels SwiftChannel: Algorithm-Hardware Co-Design for Deep Learning-Based 5G Channel Estimation Evolving Token Communication with Parametric Memory Network Remote Action Generation: Remote Control with Minimal Communication The (Marginal) Value of a Search Ad: An Online Causal Framework for Repeated Second-price Auctions Stabilizing Private LASSO under Heterogeneous Covariates via Anisotropic Objective Perturbation Linear-Readout Floors and Threshold Recovery in Computation in Superposition Soft Graph Diffusion Transformer for MIMO Detection Hierarchical Federated Learning for Networked AI: From Communication Saving to Architecture-Aware Design Exponential families from a single KL identity MIFair: A Mutual-Information Framework for Intersectionality and Multiclass Fairness Diffusion-OAMP for Joint Image Compression and Wireless Transmission Decoupled Descent: Exact Test Error Tracking Via Approximate Message Passing
Theoretic Shaping Bounds for Single Letter Constraints an...
Stella Achtenberg, Dan Raphaeli · 2013-08-28 · via cs.IT updates on arXiv.org

Shaping gain is attained in schemes where a shaped subcode is chosen from a larger codebook by a codeword selection process. This includes the popular method of Trellis Shaping (TS), originally proposed by Forney for average power reduction. The decoding process of such schemes is mismatched, since it is aware of only the large codebook. This study models such schemes by a random code construction and derives achievable bounds on the transmission rate under matched and mismatched decoding. For matched decoding the bound is obtained using a modified asymptotic equipartition property (AEP) theorem derived to suit this particular code construction. For mismatched decoding, relying on the large codebook performance is generally wrong, since the performance of the non-typical codewords within the large codebook may differ substantially from the typical ones. Hence, we present two novel lower bounds on the capacity under mismatched decoding. The first is based upon Gallager's random exponent, whereas the second on a modified version of the joint-typicality decoder.