Process capability indices such as $C_{pk}$ are widely used in manufacturing quality control to support supplier qualification and product release decisions based on fixed acceptance thresholds (e.g., $C_{pk} \geq 1.33$). In practice, these decisions rely on sample-based estimates computed from moderate sample sizes ($n \approx$ 20-50), yet the stochastic nature of the estimator is often overlooked when interpreting threshold compliance. This study establishes a local asymptotic characterization of decision behavior when the true process capability lies near a fixed threshold. Under standard regularity conditions, if the true capability equals the threshold, the acceptance probability converges to 0.5 as sample size increases, implying that a fixed $C_{pk}$ gate embeds an inherent boundary decision risk even under ideal distributional assumptions. When the true capability deviates from the threshold by $O(n^{-1/2})$, the decision probability converges to a non-degenerate limit governed by a scaled signal-to-noise ratio. Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical study on 880 manufacturing dimensions demonstrate substantial resampling-based decision instability near the commonly used 1.33 criterion. These findings provide a probabilistic interpretation of threshold-based capability decisions and quantitative guidance for assessing boundary-induced release risk in engineering practice.