惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 叶小钗
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
腾讯CDC
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
D
DataBreaches.Net
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
L
LangChain Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
F
Fortinet All Blogs
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
雷峰网
雷峰网
J
Java Code Geeks
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
小众软件
小众软件
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
T
Tailwind CSS Blog

cs.SD updates on arXiv.org

Mutual Forcing: Dual-Mode Self-Evolution for Fast Autoregressive Audio-Video Character Generation WhisperPipe: A Resource-Efficient Streaming Architecture for Real-Time Automatic Speech Recognition Walking Through Uncertainty: An Empirical Study of Uncertainty Estimation for Audio-Aware Large Language Models PSP: An Interpretable Per-Dimension Accent Benchmark for Indic Text-to-Speech Praxy Voice: Voice-Prompt Recovery + BUPS for Commercial-Class Indic TTS from a Frozen Non-Indic Base at Zero Commercial-Training-Data Cost Korean aegyo speech shows systematic F1 increase to signal childlike qualities All That Glitters Is Not Audio: Rethinking Text Priors and Audio Reliance in Audio-Language Evaluation RAS: a Reliability Oriented Metric for Automatic Speech Recognition Speech Enhancement Based on Drifting Models HeadRouter: Dynamic Head-Weight Routing for Task-Adaptive Audio Token Pruning in Large Audio Language Models Hallo-Live: Real-Time Streaming Joint Audio-Video Avatar Generation with Asynchronous Dual-Stream and Human-Centric Preference Distillation Talker-T2AV: Joint Talking Audio-Video Generation with Autoregressive Diffusion Modeling Robust Audio-Text Retrieval via Cross-Modal Attention and Hybrid Loss Spectro-Temporal Modulation Representation Framework for Human-Imitated Speech Detection UniSonate: A Unified Model for Speech, Music, and Sound Effect Generation with Text Instructions Do LLM Decoders Listen Fairly? Benchmarking How Language Model Priors Shape Bias in Speech Recognition Materialistic RIR: Material Conditioned Realistic RIR Generation SpeechParaling-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Paralinguistic-Aware Speech Generation ONOTE: Benchmarking Omnimodal Notation Processing for Expert-level Music Intelligence From Image to Music Language: A Two-Stage Structure Decoding Approach for Complex Polyphonic OMR ATIR: Towards Audio-Text Interleaved Contextual Retrieval Enhancing Speaker Verification with Whispered Speech via Post-Processing Environmental Sound Deepfake Detection Using Deep-Learning Framework Towards Streaming Target Speaker Extraction via Chunk-wise Interleaved Splicing of Autoregressive Language Model BEAT: Tokenizing and Generating Symbolic Music by Uniform Temporal Steps Deep Supervised Contrastive Learning of Pitch Contours for Robust Pitch Accent Classification in Seoul Korean HalluAudio: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Hallucination Detection in Large Audio-Language Models UAF: A Unified Audio Front-end LLM for Full-Duplex Speech Interaction Voice of India: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Real-World Speech Recognition in India Tadabur: A Large-Scale Quran Audio Dataset
LEAD Dataset: How Can Labels for Sound Event Detection Va...
Naoki Koga, Yoshiaki Bando, Keisuke Imoto · 2024-10-13 · via cs.SD updates on arXiv.org

In this paper, we introduce a LargE-scale Annotator's labels for sound event Detection (LEAD) dataset, which is the dataset used to gain a better understanding of the variation in strong labels in sound event detection (SED). In SED, it is very time-consuming to collect large-scale strong labels, and in most cases, multiple workers divide up the annotations to create a single dataset. In general, strong labels created by multiple annotators have large variations in the type of sound events and temporal onset/offset. Through the annotations of multiple workers, uniquely determining the strong label is quite difficult because the dataset contains sounds that can be mistaken for similar classes and sounds whose temporal onset/offset is difficult to distinguish. If the strong labels of SED vary greatly depending on the annotator, the SED model trained on a dataset created by multiple annotators will be biased. Moreover, if annotators differ between training and evaluation data, there is a risk that the model cannot be evaluated correctly. To investigate the variation in strong labels, we release the LEAD dataset, which provides distinct strong labels for each clip annotated by 20 different annotators. The LEAD dataset allows us to investigate how strong labels vary from annotator to annotator and consider SED models that are robust to the variation of strong labels. The LEAD dataset consists of strong labels assigned to sound clips from TUT Sound Events 2016/2017, TUT Acoustic Scenes 2016, and URBAN-SED. We also analyze variations in the strong labels in the LEAD dataset and provide insights into the variations.