LLM benchmarking metrics often misstate performance and uncertainty as they rely on two assumptions that frequently do not hold in practice: (i) a sufficient number of evaluations are available for classical inference, and (ii) test prompts are independent. We propose a corrective Bayesian hierarchical model with embedding-space clustering that provides robust performance metrics in limited-data settings while correcting for prompt dependence. We apply the approach to adversarial robustness benchmarks, showing consistent recovery of clustering structure, resulting in more reliable performance metrics, with 4-73% improvements to mean absolute errors and 40-450 unit improvements to expected log posterior densities.