惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

U
Unit 42
博客园 - 司徒正美
V
Visual Studio Blog
博客园 - 【当耐特】
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
美团技术团队
博客园 - 叶小钗
Jina AI
Jina AI
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
IT之家
IT之家
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
雷峰网
雷峰网
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
博客园_首页
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
腾讯CDC

DEV Community

Authentication Security Deep Dive: From Brute Force to Salted Hashing (With Java Examples) Why AI Systems Don’t Fail — They Drift Spilling beans for how i learn for exam😁"Reinforcement Learning Cheat Sheet" I Replaced Chrome with Safari for AI Browser Automation. Here's What Broke (and What Finally Worked) How Python Borrows Other People's Work The $40 Architecture: Processing 1 Billion API Requests with 99.99% Uptime Vibe Coding: A Workflow Guide (From Zero to SaaS) Most webhook security guides protect the wrong side. The scary part is delivery. Headless CMS for TanStack Start: Build a Blog with Cosmic EU Age Verification App "Hacked in 2 Minutes" — What Actually Happened Comfy Cloud’s delete function does not actually remove files Running AI Models on GPU Cloud Servers: A Beginner Guide Event-driven media intelligence with AWS Step Functions and Bedrock I scored 500 AI prompts across 8 quality dimensions — here's what broke How to Call Google Gemini API from Next.js (Free Tier, No Backend Needed) The Portal Protocol: Reclaiming Human Connection in the Age of AI How to Fix Your Team's Scattered Knowledge Problem With a Self-Hosted Forum Intro to tc Cloud Functors: A Graph-First Mental Model for the Modern Cloud Designing Multi-Tenant Backends With Both Ownership and Team Access I Built a Neumorphic CSS Library with 77+ Components — Here's What I Learned PostgreSQL Performance Optimization: Why Connection Pooling Is Critical at Scale Cómo construí un SaaS multi-rubro para gestionar expensas en Argentina con FastAPI + Vue 3 🚀 I Built an Ethical Hacking Scanner Tool – Open Source Project I Replaced /usage and /context in Claude Code With a Single Statusline A Pythonic Way to Handle Emails (IMAP/SMTP) with Auto-Discovery and AI-Ready Design I Collected 8.9 Million Polymarket Price Points — Here's What I Found About How Markets Really Move EcoTrack AI — Carbon Footprint Tracker & Dashboard Everyone's Using AI. No One Agrees How. 5 self-hosted ebook managers worth trying in 2026 Building Your First AI Agent with LangChain: From Chatbot to Autonomous Assistant
Retries and Circuit Breakers Belong in the Adapter, Not Y...
Gabriel Anhaia · 2026-06-14 · via DEV Community

You open a use case that places an order. It loads a customer, builds the order, charges a payment gateway, saves, publishes an event. Clean. Then a sprint ago someone added a retry loop around the charge call, because the gateway flaps under load. Now the use case has a for ($i = 0; $i < 3; $i++), a usleep(), and a comment that says // gateway is flaky on Mondays.

The business rule is buried under retry plumbing. A reader who wants to know what placing an order means has to skip past sleep timers and exception counters to find it. Worse, the next person who adds a second outbound call copies the loop. Soon every call to the network has its own hand-rolled retry, each with a slightly different backoff, none of them tested.

The use case learned about transient failure. It should never have.

Transient failure is not a business rule

A use case answers one question: what does the application do when this thing happens? Place an order. Cancel a subscription. Issue a refund. Those are decisions the business cares about.

"The payment gateway returned a 503 and we should try again in 200ms" is not a business decision. It is a property of the network between your process and theirs. The domain does not know the gateway is HTTP. It does not know there is a network at all. It asked a port to charge a customer, and the port either succeeds or raises a domain exception.

Here is the port, stated in domain language:

<?php

declare(strict_types=1);

namespace App\Application\Port;

use App\Domain\Customer\CustomerId;
use App\Domain\Shared\Money;

interface PaymentGateway
{
    public function charge(
        CustomerId $customerId,
        Money $amount,
        string $idempotencyKey,
    ): PaymentReceipt;
}

No Response, no status code, no int $retries. The use case calls charge and trusts it. If charging is impossible right now, the implementation raises PaymentGatewayUnavailable, a domain exception the use case can choose to handle. Whether the adapter tried once or five times before giving up is none of the use case's concern.

The decorator carries the resilience

The port has one interface and can have many implementations. The real one talks HTTP. A second one wraps the real one and adds retries. A third wraps that and adds a circuit breaker. Each is a PaymentGateway. The use case sees one type.

Start with the base adapter that translates HTTP errors into domain exceptions:

<?php

declare(strict_types=1);

namespace App\Infrastructure\Payment;

use App\Application\Port\PaymentGateway;
use App\Application\Port\PaymentReceipt;
use App\Domain\Customer\CustomerId;
use App\Domain\Shared\Money;
use GuzzleHttp\ClientInterface;
use GuzzleHttp\Exception\RequestException;

final readonly class HttpPaymentGateway implements PaymentGateway
{
    public function __construct(
        private ClientInterface $http,
        private string $endpoint,
    ) {}

    public function charge(
        CustomerId $customerId,
        Money $amount,
        string $idempotencyKey,
    ): PaymentReceipt {
        try {
            $response = $this->http->request('POST', $this->endpoint, [
                'headers' => ['Idempotency-Key' => $idempotencyKey],
                'json' => [
                    'customer_id' => $customerId->value,
                    'amount_minor' => $amount->amountInMinorUnits,
                    'currency' => $amount->currency,
                ],
                'timeout' => 5,
            ]);
        } catch (RequestException $e) {
            if ($e->getResponse()?->getStatusCode() === 402) {
                throw new PaymentDeclined($customerId, $amount);
            }
            throw new PaymentGatewayUnavailable(previous: $e);
        }

        $body = json_decode(
            (string) $response->getBody(),
            associative: true,
            flags: JSON_THROW_ON_ERROR,
        );
        return new PaymentReceipt($body['receipt_id'], $body['status']);
    }
}

PaymentDeclined is a business outcome — the card was refused. PaymentGatewayUnavailable is transient — the network or the remote service failed. The retry logic cares only about the second kind. A declined card should never be retried; retrying it just means asking the same question again.

Now the retrying decorator:

<?php

declare(strict_types=1);

namespace App\Infrastructure\Payment;

use App\Application\Port\Clock;
use App\Application\Port\PaymentGateway;
use App\Application\Port\PaymentReceipt;
use App\Domain\Customer\CustomerId;
use App\Domain\Shared\Money;

final readonly class RetryingPaymentGateway implements PaymentGateway
{
    public function __construct(
        private PaymentGateway $inner,
        private Sleeper $sleeper,
        private int $maxAttempts = 3,
        private int $baseDelayMs = 100,
    ) {}

    public function charge(
        CustomerId $customerId,
        Money $amount,
        string $idempotencyKey,
    ): PaymentReceipt {
        $attempt = 0;

        while (true) {
            $attempt++;
            try {
                return $this->inner->charge(
                    $customerId,
                    $amount,
                    $idempotencyKey,
                );
            } catch (PaymentGatewayUnavailable $e) {
                if ($attempt >= $this->maxAttempts) {
                    throw $e;
                }
                $this->sleeper->sleepMs(
                    $this->baseDelayMs * (2 ** ($attempt - 1)),
                );
            }
        }
    }
}

It catches only PaymentGatewayUnavailable. A PaymentDeclined flies straight through, untouched, because it is not transient. The backoff doubles each attempt. The same idempotencyKey goes out on every try, so a charge that actually landed before a timeout is not double-billed — the remote side dedupes on the key.

Sleeper is a tiny port (sleepMs(int): void) so a unit test can pass a fake that records delays instead of blocking the suite. Real sleeping is one line of usleep in the production implementation.

The circuit breaker stops the bleeding

Retries help when failure is brief. They hurt when the gateway is down hard: every request now waits through three timeouts before failing, and your worker pool fills with stalled calls. A circuit breaker fixes that. After enough failures it stops calling the gateway at all and fails fast, giving the remote service room to recover.

<?php

declare(strict_types=1);

namespace App\Infrastructure\Payment;

use App\Application\Port\PaymentGateway;
use App\Application\Port\PaymentReceipt;
use App\Domain\Customer\CustomerId;
use App\Domain\Shared\Money;

final readonly class CircuitBreakerPaymentGateway implements PaymentGateway
{
    public function __construct(
        private PaymentGateway $inner,
        private CircuitState $state,
    ) {}

    public function charge(
        CustomerId $customerId,
        Money $amount,
        string $idempotencyKey,
    ): PaymentReceipt {
        if ($this->state->isOpen()) {
            throw new PaymentGatewayUnavailable(
                message: 'circuit open',
            );
        }

        try {
            $receipt = $this->inner->charge(
                $customerId,
                $amount,
                $idempotencyKey,
            );
            $this->state->recordSuccess();
            return $receipt;
        } catch (PaymentGatewayUnavailable $e) {
            $this->state->recordFailure();
            throw $e;
        }
    }
}

CircuitState is a port too. The production version keeps the failure count and the open-until timestamp in Redis so all your workers share one view of the gateway's health. A fake keeps it in an array for tests. The decorator does not know or care which one it holds.

Note the breaker also raises PaymentGatewayUnavailable when it short-circuits. The use case sees the same domain exception whether the gateway timed out, retried out, or was fenced off by an open circuit. One failure type, handled in one place upstream.

Wiring it at the composition root

The stacking happens once, where you build the container. The use case asks for a PaymentGateway and receives the whole onion without knowing its layers.

$c->set(PaymentGateway::class, fn(C $c) =>
    new CircuitBreakerPaymentGateway(
        new RetryingPaymentGateway(
            new HttpPaymentGateway(
                $c->get(ClientInterface::class),
                $_ENV['PAYMENT_GATEWAY_URL'],
            ),
            $c->get(Sleeper::class),
        ),
        $c->get(CircuitState::class),
    ),
);

Read it inside out: HTTP at the core, retries around it, the breaker on the outside so it fences off the whole retrying stack when the gateway is unhealthy. Want retries without the breaker in a low-traffic service? Drop one constructor call. Want a different backoff for a different gateway? Pass different numbers. The use case file does not change. It never knew any of this existed.

What this buys you

The use case stays readable. Open PlaceOrder and you read the business sequence with nothing in the way. No loop, no sleep, no failure counting.

The resilience is testable in isolation. RetryingPaymentGateway has its own unit test that asserts it retries three times on PaymentGatewayUnavailable, gives up on the fourth, and never retries a PaymentDeclined. It uses a fake inner gateway and a fake sleeper. No network, no real timer.

public function test_retries_then_succeeds(): void
{
    $inner = new FlakyGateway(failTimes: 2);
    $sleeper = new RecordingSleeper();

    $gateway = new RetryingPaymentGateway($inner, $sleeper);
    $receipt = $gateway->charge(
        new CustomerId('c-1'),
        new Money(3000, 'EUR'),
        'key-1',
    );

    self::assertSame('ok', $receipt->status);
    self::assertSame(3, $inner->attempts());
    self::assertSame([100, 200], $sleeper->delays());
}

And the policy lives in one place. When ops asks for five attempts instead of three, or a longer breaker cooldown, you change a constant at the composition root or in one decorator. You do not grep the application layer for hand-rolled loops, because there are none. The use case asked a port to charge a customer. Everything about how hard to try is an infrastructure detail, and infrastructure details live in adapters.

The next time a retry loop shows up in a use case during review, ask what it is protecting against. If the answer is "the network," it is in the wrong file. Move it out, wrap the adapter, and let the use case go back to describing the business.


If this was useful

Decorating adapters with retries, breakers, timeouts, and caching, without leaking any of it into the domain, is one of the threads Decoupled PHP follows from the first port to a production-shaped service. The book builds the same vocabulary used here and pushes into the failure modes that show up once the happy path works: partial writes, poison messages, and the migration path for a framework-coupled codebase that needs this discipline most.

Decoupled PHP — Clean and Hexagonal Architecture for Applications That Outlive the Framework

Available on Kindle, Paperback, and Hardcover. English, German, and Japanese editions out now — Portuguese and Spanish coming soon.