惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园_首页
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
V
Visual Studio Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
美团技术团队
小众软件
小众软件
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
月光博客
月光博客
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
罗磊的独立博客
V
V2EX
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
IT之家
IT之家
量子位
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog

Hacker News

GitHub - SeanFDZ/macmind: Single-layer transformer in HyperTalk for the classic Macintosh Show HN: Agent-cache – Multi-tier LLM/tool/session caching for Valkey and Redis Bonsai 1-bit WebGPU - a Hugging Face Space by webml-community Moving a large-scale metrics pipeline from StatsD to OpenTelemetry / Prometheus GitHub - Nightmare-Eclipse/RedSun: The Red Sun vulnerability repository GitHub - SethPyle376/hiraeth: Local AWS emulator focused on fast integration testing, with SQS support, SQLite-backed state, and a debug-friendly web UI. GitHub - macOS26/Agent: Any AI, replaces Claude Code, Cursor, OpenClaw. Over 18 LLM providers (Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama, Zai, HF, Qwen) wired into a native Mac app that writes code, builds Xcode projects, bumps versions, manages git, automates Safari, use AppleScript, JS or Accessibility, extend Agent! w/ MCP Servers, run tasks from your iPhone via Messages. YouTube now lets you turn off Shorts I Made a Terminal Pager Burgers | マクドナルド公式 Commands — HackerNews CLI documentation ChatGPT for Excel PiCore - Raspberry Pi Port of Tiny Core Linux Live Nation illegally monopolized ticketing market, jury finds Google Broke Its Promise to Me. Now ICE Has My Data. Founding Engineer at Adaptional | Y Combinator CRISPR takes important step toward silencing Down syndrome’s extra chromosome GitHub - saffron-health/libretto: The AI toolkit for building reliable browser automations US v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026) no attorney-client privilege for AI chats [pdf] Retrofitting JIT Compilers into C Interpreters IPv6 – Google The Accursèd Alphabetical Clock Cybersecurity Looks Like Proof of Work Now Fragments: April 14 Cal.com Goes Closed Source: Why AI Security Is Forcing Our Decision | Cal.com - Scheduling Software for Online Bookings Laravel raised money and now injects ads directly into your agent When moving fast, talking is the first thing to break Too much Discussion of the XOR swap trick – Heather Cafe Introduction to Spherical Harmonics for Graphics Programmers The Grand Line
Jensen–Shannon divergence
Contributors to Wikimedia projects · 2006-02-10 · via Hacker News

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In probability theory and statistics, the Jensen–Shannon divergence, named after Johan Jensen and Claude Shannon, is a method of measuring the similarity between two probability distributions. It is also known as information radius (IRad)[1][2] or total divergence to the average.[3] It is based on the Kullback–Leibler divergence, with some notable (and useful) differences, including that it is symmetric and it always has a finite value. The square root of the Jensen–Shannon divergence is a metric often referred to as Jensen–Shannon distance. The similarity between the distributions is greater when the Jensen-Shannon distance is closer to zero.[4][5][6]

Consider the set {\displaystyle M_{+}^{1}(A)} of probability distributions where {\displaystyle A} is a set provided with some σ-algebra of measurable subsets. In particular we can take {\displaystyle A} to be a finite or countable set with all subsets being measurable.

The Jensen–Shannon divergence (JSD) is a symmetrized and smoothed version of the Kullback–Leibler divergence {\displaystyle D(P\parallel Q)}. It is defined by

{\displaystyle {\rm {JSD}}(P\parallel Q)={\frac {1}{2}}D(P\parallel M)+{\frac {1}{2}}D(Q\parallel M),}

where {\displaystyle M={\frac {1}{2}}(P+Q)} is a mixture distribution of {\displaystyle P} and {\displaystyle Q}.

The geometric Jensen–Shannon divergence[7] (or G-Jensen–Shannon divergence) yields a closed-form formula for divergence between two Gaussian distributions by taking the geometric mean.

A more general definition, allowing for the comparison of more than two probability distributions, is:

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\rm {JSD}}_{\pi _{1},\ldots ,\pi _{n}}(P_{1},P_{2},\ldots ,P_{n})&=\sum _{i}\pi _{i}D(P_{i}\parallel M)\\&=H\left(M\right)-\sum _{i=1}^{n}\pi _{i}H(P_{i})\end{aligned}}}

where

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}M&:=\sum _{i=1}^{n}\pi _{i}P_{i}\end{aligned}}}

and {\displaystyle \pi _{1},\ldots ,\pi _{n}} are weights that are selected for the probability distributions {\displaystyle P_{1},P_{2},\ldots ,P_{n}}, and {\displaystyle H(P)} is the Shannon entropy for distribution {\displaystyle P}. For the two-distribution case described above,

{\displaystyle P_{1}=P,P_{2}=Q,\pi _{1}=\pi _{2}={\frac {1}{2}}.\ }

Hence, for those distributions {\displaystyle P,Q}

{\displaystyle JSD=H(M)-{\frac {1}{2}}{\bigg (}H(P)+H(Q){\bigg )}}

The Jensen–Shannon divergence is bounded by 1 for two discrete probability distributions, given that one uses the base 2 logarithm:[8]

{\displaystyle 0\leq {\rm {JSD}}(P\parallel Q)\leq 1}.

With this normalization, it is a lower bound on the total variation distance between P and Q:

{\displaystyle {\rm {JSD}}(P\parallel Q)\leq {\frac {1}{2}}\|P-Q\|_{1}={\frac {1}{2}}\sum _{\omega \in \Omega }|P(\omega )-Q(\omega )|}.

With base-e logarithm, which is commonly used in statistical thermodynamics, the upper bound is {\displaystyle \ln(2)}. In general, the bound in base b is {\displaystyle \log _{b}(2)}:

{\displaystyle 0\leq {\rm {JSD}}(P\parallel Q)\leq \log _{b}(2)}.

A more general bound, the Jensen–Shannon divergence is bounded by {\displaystyle \log _{b}(n)} for more than two probability distributions:[8]

{\displaystyle 0\leq {\rm {JSD}}_{\pi _{1},\ldots ,\pi _{n}}(P_{1},P_{2},\ldots ,P_{n})\leq \log _{b}(n)}.

Relation to mutual information

[edit]

The Jensen–Shannon divergence is the mutual information between a random variable {\displaystyle X} associated to a mixture distribution between {\displaystyle P} and {\displaystyle Q} and the binary indicator variable {\displaystyle Z} that is used to switch between {\displaystyle P} and {\displaystyle Q} to produce the mixture. Let {\displaystyle X} be some abstract function on the underlying set of events that discriminates well between events, and choose the value of {\displaystyle X} according to {\displaystyle P} if {\displaystyle Z=0} and according to {\displaystyle Q} if {\displaystyle Z=1}, where {\displaystyle Z} is equiprobable. That is, we are choosing {\displaystyle X} according to the probability measure {\displaystyle M=(P+Q)/2}, and its distribution is the mixture distribution. We compute

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}I(X;Z)&=H(X)-H(X|Z)\\&=-\sum M\log M+{\frac {1}{2}}\left[\sum P\log P+\sum Q\log Q\right]\\&=-\sum {\frac {P}{2}}\log M-\sum {\frac {Q}{2}}\log M+{\frac {1}{2}}\left[\sum P\log P+\sum Q\log Q\right]\\&={\frac {1}{2}}\sum P\left(\log P-\log M\right)+{\frac {1}{2}}\sum Q\left(\log Q-\log M\right)\\&={\rm {JSD}}(P\parallel Q)\end{aligned}}}

It follows from the above result that the Jensen–Shannon divergence is bounded by 0 and 1 because mutual information is non-negative and bounded by {\displaystyle H(Z)=1} in base 2 logarithm.

One can apply the same principle to a joint distribution and the product of its two marginal distribution (in analogy to Kullback–Leibler divergence and mutual information) and to measure how reliably one can decide if a given response comes from the joint distribution or the product distribution—subject to the assumption that these are the only two possibilities.[9]

Quantum Jensen–Shannon divergence

[edit]

The generalization of probability distributions on density matrices allows to define quantum Jensen–Shannon divergence (QJSD).[10][11] It is defined for a set of density matrices {\displaystyle (\rho _{1},\ldots ,\rho _{n})} and a probability distribution {\displaystyle \pi =(\pi _{1},\ldots ,\pi _{n})} as

{\displaystyle {\rm {QJSD}}(\rho _{1},\ldots ,\rho _{n})=S\left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}\pi _{i}\rho _{i}\right)-\sum _{i=1}^{n}\pi _{i}S(\rho _{i})}

where {\displaystyle S(\rho )} is the von Neumann entropy of {\displaystyle \rho }. This quantity was introduced in quantum information theory, where it is called the Holevo information: it gives the upper bound for amount of classical information encoded by the quantum states {\displaystyle (\rho _{1},\ldots ,\rho _{n})} under the prior distribution {\displaystyle \pi } (see Holevo's theorem).[12] Quantum Jensen–Shannon divergence for {\displaystyle \pi =\left({\frac {1}{2}},{\frac {1}{2}}\right)} and two density matrices is a symmetric function, everywhere defined, bounded and equal to zero only if two density matrices are the same. It is a square of a metric for pure states,[13] and it was recently shown that this metric property holds for mixed states as well.[14][15] The Bures metric is closely related to the quantum JS divergence; it is the quantum analog of the Fisher information metric.

Jensen–Shannon centroid

[edit]

The centroid C* of a finite set of probability distributions can be defined as the minimizer of the average sum of the Jensen-Shannon divergences between a probability distribution and the prescribed set of distributions: {\displaystyle C^{*}=\arg \min _{Q}\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\rm {JSD}}(P_{i}\parallel Q)} An efficient algorithm[16] (CCCP) based on difference of convex functions is reported to calculate the Jensen-Shannon centroid of a set of discrete distributions (histograms).

The Jensen–Shannon divergence has been applied in bioinformatics and genome comparison,[17][18] in protein surface comparison,[19] in the social sciences,[20] in the quantitative study of history,[21] in fire experiments,[22] and in machine learning.[23]

  1. ^ Frank Nielsen (2021). "On a variational definition for the Jensen-Shannon symmetrization of distances based on the information radius". Entropy. 23 (4). MDPI: 464. Bibcode:2019Entrp..21..485N. doi:10.3390/e21050485. PMC 7514974. PMID 33267199.
  2. ^ Hinrich Schütze; Christopher D. Manning (1999). Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. p. 304. ISBN 978-0-262-13360-9.
  3. ^ Dagan, Ido; Lee, Lillian; Pereira, Fernando C. N. (1997). "Similarity-based methods for word sense disambiguation". In Cohen, Philip R.; Wahlster, Wolfgang (eds.). 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference, 7–12 July 1997, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers / ACL. pp. 56–63. arXiv:cmp-lg/9708010. doi:10.3115/976909.979625.
  4. ^ Endres, D. M.; J. E. Schindelin (2003). "A new metric for probability distributions" (PDF). IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 49 (7): 1858–1860. Bibcode:2003ITIT...49.1858E. doi:10.1109/TIT.2003.813506. hdl:10023/1591. S2CID 14437777.
  5. ^ Ôsterreicher, F.; I. Vajda (2003). "A new class of metric divergences on probability spaces and its statistical applications". Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 55 (3): 639–653. doi:10.1007/BF02517812. S2CID 13085920.
  6. ^ Fuglede, B.; Topsoe, F. (2004). "Jensen-Shannon divergence and Hilbert space embedding" (PDF). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Theory, 2004. IEEE. p. 30. doi:10.1109/ISIT.2004.1365067. ISBN 978-0-7803-8280-0. S2CID 7891037.
  7. ^ Frank Nielsen (2019). "On the Jensen-Shannon symmetrization of distances relying on abstract means". Entropy. 21 (5). MDPI: 485. arXiv:1904.04017. Bibcode:2019Entrp..21..485N. doi:10.3390/e21050485. PMC 7514974. PMID 33267199.
  8. ^ a b Lin, J. (1991). "Divergence measures based on the shannon entropy" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 37 (1): 145–151. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.127.9167. doi:10.1109/18.61115. S2CID 12121632.
  9. ^ Schneidman, Elad; Bialek, W; Berry, M.J. II (2003). "Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes". Journal of Neuroscience. 23 (37): 11539–11553. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-37-11539.2003. PMC 6740962. PMID 14684857.
  10. ^ Majtey, A.; Lamberti, P.; Prato, D. (2005). "Jensen-Shannon divergence as a measure of distinguishability between mixed quantum states". Physical Review A. 72 (5) 052310. arXiv:quant-ph/0508138. Bibcode:2005PhRvA..72e2310M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052310. S2CID 32062112.
  11. ^ Briët, Jop; Harremoës, Peter (2009). "Properties of classical and quantum Jensen-Shannon divergence". Physical Review A. 79 (5) 052311. arXiv:0806.4472. Bibcode:2009PhRvA..79e2311B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.79.052311.
  12. ^ Holevo, A. S. (1973), "Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel", Problemy Peredachi Informatsii (in Russian), 9: 3–11. English translation: Probl. Inf. Transm., 9: 177–183 (1975) MR 0456936
  13. ^ Braunstein, Samuel; Caves, Carlton (1994). "Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states". Physical Review Letters. 72 (22): 3439–3443. Bibcode:1994PhRvL..72.3439B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3439. PMID 10056200.
  14. ^ Virosztek, Dániel (2021). "The metric property of the quantum Jensen-Shannon divergence". Advances in Mathematics. 380 107595. arXiv:1910.10447. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2021.107595. S2CID 204837864.
  15. ^ Sra, Suvrit (2019). "Metrics Induced by Quantum Jensen-Shannon-Renyí and Related Divergences". arXiv:1911.02643 [cs.IT].
  16. ^ Frank Nielsen (2021). "On a generalization of the Jensen-Shannon divergence and the Jensen--Shannon centroid". Entropy. 22 (2). MDPI: 221. doi:10.3390/e22020221. PMC 7516653. PMID 33285995.
  17. ^ Sims, GE; Jun, SR; Wu, GA; Kim, SH (2009). "Alignment-free genome comparison with feature frequency profiles (FFP) and optimal resolutions". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (8): 2677–82. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.2677S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0813249106. PMC 2634796. PMID 19188606.
  18. ^ Itzkovitz, S; Hodis, E; Segal, E (2010). "Overlapping codes within protein-coding sequences". Genome Research. 20 (11): 1582–9. doi:10.1101/gr.105072.110. PMC 2963821. PMID 20841429.
  19. ^ Ofran, Y; Rost, B (2003). "Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces". Journal of Molecular Biology. 325 (2): 377–87. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.6.9207. doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01223-8. PMID 12488102.
  20. ^ DeDeo, Simon; Hawkins, Robert X. D.; Klingenstein, Sara; Hitchcock, Tim (2013). "Bootstrap Methods for the Empirical Study of Decision-Making and Information Flows in Social Systems". Entropy. 15 (6): 2246–2276. arXiv:1302.0907. Bibcode:2013Entrp..15.2246D. doi:10.3390/e15062246.
  21. ^ Klingenstein, Sara; Hitchcock, Tim; DeDeo, Simon (2014). "The civilizing process in London's Old Bailey". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111 (26): 9419–9424. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.9419K. doi:10.1073/pnas.1405984111. PMC 4084475. PMID 24979792.
  22. ^ Flavia-Corina Mitroi-Symeonidis; Ion Anghel; Nicuşor Minculete (2020). "Parametric Jensen-Shannon statistical complexity and its applications on full-scale compartment fire data". Symmetry. 12 (1): 22. doi:10.3390/sym12010022.
  23. ^ Goodfellow, Ian J.; Pouget-Abadie, Jean; Mirza, Mehdi; Xu, Bing; Warde-Farley, David; Ozair, Sherjil; Courville, Aaron; Bengio, Yoshua (2014). Generative Adversarial Networks. NIPS. arXiv:1406.2661. Bibcode:2014arXiv1406.2661G.