惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
Docker
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
H
Help Net Security
F
Fortinet All Blogs
H
Heimdal Security Blog
S
Schneier on Security
L
LangChain Blog
博客园 - Franky
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园 - 【当耐特】
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
W
WeLiveSecurity
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
I
InfoQ
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
T
Tenable Blog
腾讯CDC
C
Check Point Blog
量子位
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
GbyAI
GbyAI
罗磊的独立博客
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
B
Blog
小众软件
小众软件
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
T
Threatpost
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
S
Securelist
The Cloudflare Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
爱范儿
爱范儿

Datadog | The Monitor blog

Introducing our open source AI-native SAST Instrument and monitor Boomi integration flows with OpenTelemetry and Datadog Not all index scans are equal: How we cut query latency by over 99% Platform engineering metrics: What to measure and what to ignore Integrate Recorded Future threat intelligence with Datadog Cloud SIEM CI/CD security: threat modeling using a MITRE-style threat matrix CI/CD security: How to secure your GitHub ecosystem Ingress NGINX is EOL: A practical guide for migrating to Kubernetes Gateway API Operating agentic AI with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore and Datadog LLM Observability: Lessons from NTT DATA Introducing the Datadog Code Security MCP Capture and analyze custom heatmaps in Session Replay Understand session replays faster with AI summaries and smart chapters Monitor ClickHouse query performance with Datadog Database Monitoring How we designed empathetic alert sounds for on-call engineers Search and act across Datadog to resolve issues faster with Bits Assistant Measure the business impact of every product change with Datadog Experiments Analyzing round trip query latency Configuring JavaScript caches for better performance Introducing Bits AI Dev Agent for Code Security Datadog achieves ISO 42001 certification for responsible AI Monitor Nutanix clusters, hosts, and VMs with Datadog Monitor Juniper Mist in Datadog A new Host Map for modern infrastructure Annotate traces to improve LLM quality with Datadog LLM Observability What’s new in Cloud SIEM: AI-powered investigations, enhanced threat intelligence, and scalable security operations Explore Kubernetes with native OpenTelemetry data Monitor Oracle Fusion Cloud Applications with Datadog Announcing the Datadog Terraform provider v4.0.0 Scaling Kubernetes workloads on custom metrics How to design cloud environments for AI-powered threat analysis Monitor Aruba Central in Datadog How we centralize and remediate risks with Datadog Case Management Accelerate incident response with Datadog and ServiceNow Monitor your application and network load balancer logs Understanding Karpenter architecture for Kubernetes autoscaling Tools for collecting metrics and logs from Karpenter Monitor Karpenter with Datadog What your product data is actually saying Key metrics for monitoring Karpenter Securing Datadog’s platform in the AI age: The role of observability data Four ways engineering teams use the Datadog MCP Server to power AI agents Approaching your observability migration with the right mindset Meet the new Bits AI SRE: Deeper reasoning, twice as fast Key learnings from the 2026 State of DevSecOps study Use plain English to query your multi-cloud infrastructure in Resource Catalog Simplifying troubleshooting across the user journey with Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Protect your OCI resources with Datadog Cloud Security This Month in Datadog - February 2026 Amazon EC2 security: How misconfigured and public AMIs expand your cloud attack surface Enable end-to-end visibility into your Java apps with a single command Measure and improve mobile app startup performance with Datadog RUM Evaluating our AI Guard application to improve quality and control cost Identify untested code across every level of your codebase Make use of guardrail metrics and stop babysitting your releases Monitor Versa Networks SD-WAN performance in Datadog Improve performance and reliability with APM Recommendations Remediate transitive vulnerabilities faster with Datadog Software Composition Analysis Generate audit-ready vulnerability and compliance reports with Datadog Sheets Monitor Fortinet FortiManager performance in Datadog Improve test coverage across codebases with Datadog Code Coverage Move fast, don’t break things: Consistent testing standards at scale Enrich logs with ServiceNow CMDB context before routing to any SIEM or logging tool Monitor Lustre with Datadog Make faster, better product decisions with Datadog Product Analytics Surface and remediate runtime posture issues with Workload Protection Findings Protect agentic AI applications with Datadog AI Guard How to optimize JavaScript code with CSS Trace Google Pub/Sub workloads in Cloud Run with Datadog Detect human names in logs with ML in Sensitive Data Scanner How we cut our NLQ agent debugging time from hours to minutes with LLM Observability Debug PostgreSQL query latency faster with EXPLAIN ANALYZE in Datadog Database Monitoring Datadog acquires Propolis Unify and correlate frontend and backend data with retention filters Scale compliance across global frameworks with Datadog Cloud Security Monitor Arista VeloCloud SD-WAN performance with Datadog Building reliable dashboard agents with Datadog LLM Observability Simplify log collection and aggregation for MSSPs with Datadog Observability Pipelines Mitigation for Node.js denial-of-service vulnerability affecting Datadog APM Automate flaky test fixes with the Bits AI Dev Agent and Test Optimization How we built an AI SRE agent that investigates like a team of engineers Datadog integrations 2025 recap: Observability for AI, security, and hybrid cloud Design effective executive dashboards with Datadog Implement dbt data quality checks with dbt-expectations Bring faster visibility into AWS Lambda functions with remote instrumentation Troubleshoot faster with the GitLab Source Code integration in Datadog How Cambia Health Solutions saved $30,000 monthly with Cloud Cost Management and the Datadog Resource Catalog Normalize any logs for Cloud SIEM with Datadog's OCSF processor Optimizing Datadog at scale: Cost-efficient observability at Zendesk Detect, diagnose, and resolve network issues easily with CNM Network Health Connect engineering errors to user impact in early-stage products Cilium configuration for Kubernetes operations at scale Designing feedback loops for progressive delivery Ship features faster and safer with Datadog Feature Flags Choosing the right OpenTelemetry Collector distribution Route your monitor alerts with Datadog monitor notification rules Automate Cloud SIEM investigations with Bits AI Security Analyst Cloud threat detection: How to identify risky activity across control and data planes Collecting Kafka performance metrics Monitoring Kafka with Datadog Monitoring Kafka performance metrics
Manage service tracing across hosts with Single Step Instrumentation rules | Datadog
Sarjeel Yusuf · 2026-04-16 · via Datadog | The Monitor blog
Sarjeel Yusuf

Sarjeel Yusuf

Single Step Instrumentation (SSI) simplifies Datadog Application Performance Monitoring (APM) by automatically discovering and instrumenting services across a host. For many teams, SSI is the ideal starting point because it helps them achieve full visibility with minimal setup.

However, as environments grow, teams often want more control over which services get traced. Auxiliary workloads such as batch jobs and cron tasks might not require distributed tracing. By controlling which services produce traces, teams can focus on the data that helps them make debugging and performance decisions.

Instrumentation rules add a layer of control on top of SSI, enabling you to decide which services on Linux and Windows generate traces. You can apply the rules while keeping automatic discovery and your zero-touch setup.

In this post, we’ll show how instrumentation rules help you:

  • Control which services are traced on Linux and Windows hosts

  • Define rules that match your environment

  • Manage instrumentation centrally across your fleet

Control which services are traced on Linux and Windows hosts

With SSI enabled, Datadog automatically loads tracing libraries into running processes, so you don’t need to configure APM instrumentation for each service. Instrumentation rules build on SSI by letting you control which processes are instrumented. The SSI mechanism evaluates each running process against defined rules before applying instrumentation. When a rule blocks instrumentation, no trace SDK is automatically loaded. All other processes continue to be instrumented based on your configured default behavior.

For example, let’s say that you have an ecommerce application composed of several microservices across different runtimes and frameworks. You also have a recurring analytics job that runs as part of your service stack. SSI instruments all the processes, including the analytics job, by default. But the analytics job produces spans that don’t contribute to debugging or performance analysis, so you don’t want to trace it.

You can define a rule to prevent the analytics job from generating traces while the other services continue to be instrumented. Excluding the analytics job reduces unnecessary trace volume and cost without requiring code changes.

The Datadog APM instrumentation rules page, which lists default instrumentation behavior, in-scope infrastructure, and specific rules.

Define rules that match your environment

Instrumentation rules rely on attributes that describe how processes run in your environment. You create rules in the Datadog UI by defining a condition, choosing an action, and specifying default behavior for processes that don’t match any rule.

For example, you can configure rules to instrument everything by default except explicitly excluded workloads, or you can block instrumentation unless a process matches an Allow condition. You can also combine multiple rules to handle different scenarios. When rules overlap, Datadog evaluates them in order of priority, and the first matching rule determines the outcome.

Rules can match processes based on several attributes that are categorized:

  • Environment: operating system (Linux or Windows)

  • Process: working directory, executable, executable full path, arguments, and IIS application pool

  • Runtime: language and entry point file

With attributes, you can exclude a service by its working directory path, block a specific binary by executable name, or target all processes of a particular language runtime such as Python or Java. Going back to the example of the recurring analytics job, you can exclude that job from tracing by matching any process whose path contains analytics-service.

Rule configuration screen that shows how to define instrumentation rules by using the Working Directory process attribute as a condition.

Manage instrumentation centrally across your fleet

Instrumentation rules provide a centralized way to manage tracing behavior across your environment. After you save an instrumentation rule, you can use Remote Configuration to deploy it. Remote Configuration propagates updates across all applicable hosts without requiring SSH access or redeployment.

If you don’t want to manage your instrumentation centrally—for example, in an environment that has stricter change-control requirements—you can export rules as configuration files and apply them directly on each host. Once you apply the rules, they take effect as soon as you restart your application services.

The following screenshots show the effect of the deployed rule that excludes tracing for the analytics job in our example. Before the rule is applied, SSI instruments all the services, including datafish-analytics-service.

Datadog APM trace view that shows a distributed trace that includes spans from `datafish-analytics-service` before an instrumentation rule is applied.

After the rule is deployed, the analytics job stops generating traces and disappears from the waterfall list of traced services. All the other services continue running as they did before, with full instrumentation.

Datadog APM trace view showing a distributed trace with `datafish-analytics-service` excluded after an instrumentation rule is applied.

Refine tracing with Single Step Instrumentation rules

Instrumentation rules enable you to adjust tracing behavior without changing how services are instrumented. You can continue using SSI for automatic discovery and instrumentation while excluding services that don’t require tracing. By combining rule-based control with centralized deployment, you can maintain useful trace data while reducing unnecessary noise. To learn more, read the instrumentation rules documentation.

If you’re new to Datadog, you can sign up for a 14-day free trial to explore instrumentation rules.