惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

P
Privacy International News Feed
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Security Latest
Security Latest
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
K
Kaspersky official blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
V
Visual Studio Blog
美团技术团队
J
Java Code Geeks
I
Intezer
The Cloudflare Blog
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
S
Secure Thoughts
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
D
DataBreaches.Net
S
Security Affairs
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
S
Securelist
F
Full Disclosure
C
Check Point Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Y
Y Combinator Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园_首页
G
Google Developers Blog
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
H
Help Net Security
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
I
InfoQ
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
H
Hacker News: Front Page
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
L
LangChain Blog

Catchpoint Blog

SRE Report: AI optimism and the economics of effort SRE Report: Why fast is what users trust SRE Report 2026: What surprised us, what didn't, and why the gaps matter most The SRE Report 2026: Defensible Ns Why Synthetic Tracing Delivers Better Data, Not Just More Data A New Chapter: LogicMonitor + Catchpoint – A Personal Note from Mehdi Mezmo + Catchpoint deliver observability SREs can rely on The four pillars holding up your digital business, and what happens when they crumble When payments pause: lessons from a global payments outage Observability 2025 Decoded: What the DZone Report Means for SLO-Driven Ops The next evolution of WebPageTest has arrived, and it’s a game-changer The Monitoring Blind Spot That Could Cost You Black Friday Powering Mexico’s Digital Future: Expanded Internet Observability with Catchpoint The Next Chapter of WebPageTest: Your New Experience Starts Soon SRE Report Retrospectives — Have AIOps Predictions Held Up? When BGP becomes UX: The inside story of a SaaS routing decision gone wrong (or right) Session Replay explained: A guide to seeing digital experience through your user’s eyes Making the invisible visible: Are your cloud firewalls and DDoS protection really working? Why it’s time to move beyond APM: Monitoring from the user’s perspective When metrics mislead: Inside the 2025 Retail Web Performance Benchmark The vendor trap: why your next outage won’t be your fault—but will be your problem LLMs don’t stand still: How to monitor and trust the models powering your AI Semantic Caching: What We Measured, Why It Matters The Annual SRE Survey Is Open—We Want to Hear from You Observability isn’t about the tool. It’s about the truth Invisible dependencies, visible impact: Lessons from the Google Cloud outage Real-time detection of BGP blackholing and prefix hijacks Leading analyst firm reveals the real cost of internet disruptions The Power of Over 3000 Intelligent Observability Agents Monitoring in the Age of Complexity: 5 Assumptions CIOs Need to Rethink Why Intelligent Traffic Steering is Critical for Performance and Cost Optimization Retail digital performance event recap: Key insights from IBM & Catchpoint Zendesk outage: A case for proactive monitoring and faster incident response Silence during chaos: Why the X outage is a call to arms for proactive monitoring The $1 Million Lesson: Building a Culture of Quality Through SLAs When AI tools fail: How to map your AI dependencies for proactive visibility Why Super Bowl 2025 was a triumph for Internet Resilience Why Internet Performance Monitoring is the new health check for IT organizations Why use Playwright in Catchpoint for synthetic monitoring Introducing WebPageTest Expert Plan: Real-Time Insights, Synthetic + RUM together in One Platform The shift to digital: How businesses are reshaping their priorities for 2025 The SRE Report 2025's Call to Action Monitoring in the Age of the Internet: DEM, IPM, and APM—What You Need to Know SSL Monitoring, Trust, and McLOVIN Performing for the holidays: Look beyond uptime for season sales success Lessons from Microsoft’s office 365 Outage: The Importance of third-party monitoring Web Performance Experts Look into the Future of Web Performance The hidden challenges of Internet Resilience: Key insights from 2024 report When SSL Issues aren’t just about SSL: A deep dive into the TIBCO Mashery outage The curious case of Marriott and the untold impact of web performance on revenue Preparing for the unexpected: Lessons from the AJIO and Jio Outage It’s time to stop neglecting the elephant in the room: Performance Matters! The Need for Speed: Highlights from IBM and Catchpoint’s Global DNS Performance Study Learnings from ServiceNow’s Proactive Response to a Network Breakdown Webinar Recap: Taking Web Performance to the Next Level Use the Catchpoint Terraform Provider in your CI/CD workflows Is the Internet ready for L4S? Takeaways from the CrowdStrike outage: third-parties can pose risk July 19th global IT outage reminds us of digital complexity 5 Actions you can take to improve digital performance 2024: A banner year for Internet Resilience APM vs Observability: Both-and, not either-or AppAssure: Ensuring the resilience of your Tier-1 applications just became easier APM vs observability: why your definitions are broken APM vs Observability: What comes next? APM vs Observability: Observing beyond APM Achieving stability with agility in your CI/CD pipeline AWS Outage: How do you prepare for the failure of your own safety net? Agentic AI: Powerful But Fragile—What You Need to Know Catch frustration before it costs you: New tools for a better user experience Catchpoint Expands Observability Network to Barcelona: A Growing Internet Hub Catchpoint Peak Performance Summit 2025: Redefining Observability for the Outcome Economy Catchpoint named a leader in the 2024 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Digital Experience Monitoring Consolidation and Modernization in Enterprise Observability Connected Devices: Unlocking the next frontier of Internet Performance Monitoring Cloud Monitoring's Blind Spot: The User Perspective Cloudflare’s Resolver Outage: More Than Just DNS Cloudflare outage: another wake-up call for resilience planning Demystifying API Monitoring and Testing with IPM Creating the IPM Category: Catchpoint’s Journey to Leadership and the LogicMonitor Era Critical Requirements for Modern API Monitoring Customer Survey 2024: Unveiling insights and impact Did Delta's slow web performance signal trouble before CrowdStrike? Diagnosing Wi-Fi failures that traditional tools miss: a case study DNS misconfiguration can happen to anyone - the question is how fast can you detect it? ECN explained: Navigate congestion for faster, smoother data delivery Don’t get caught in the dark: Lessons from a Lumen & AWS micro-outage Escalating risk, shrinking margins: The 2025 Internet Resilience Report From refresh to results: the metrics that shaped Election Day 2024 coverage Fast and furious: The importance of performance in the digital age Getting Started with Traceroute From the source to the edge: the six agent types you can’t ignore From SEO to AEO: Why Web Performance Is the Key to AI Search Success Here’s the proof: What the fastest sites on the web have in common Google’s Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol is here—Now Let’s Make it Observable How IPM helped a top tech brand catch an OpenAI outage before it became a crisis How AI Turns Monitoring From “What Now?” Into “What’s Next?” How SAP achieved world-class uptime through modern observability How to Monitor AI Agents in Commerce Systems
Going for gold: Testing the resilience of Olympic websites
2026-05-31 · via Catchpoint Blog

in this blog post

As the world gears up for the Paris Olympics, it’s not just athletes who need to be in peak condition.

This Olympics comes hot on the heels of the largest IT outage in history. Recovery efforts from the CrowdStrike outage are still ongoing. Lessons will be learned, no doubt, but at least one takeaway is already evident: the modern web is an oh-so-fragile thing; neglect digital resilience at your peril.

For businesses, especially those partnering with or linked to the Olympics, this period is critical.

Millions of visitors will flock to these sites for updates, scores, and bookings, making it crucial to monitor performance from the end user's perspective.

Given this context, Catchpoint tested the performance of the official Paris Olympics site and key partner pages to ensure they can handle the increased traffic and deliver a seamless user experience during the Olympics. We conducted our tests between 16 and 23 July 2024, focusing on the following performance metrics:

  • Response time: Measures how long it takes for the base HTML of a webpage to load.
  • Round-trip time (RTT): The time it takes for a packet to travel from the source to a destination and back again.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): Measures how long it takes for the largest content element (such as hero images or videos) to load within the user’s viewport.

By monitoring these metrics, organizations can quickly detect and resolve performance issues, ensuring their websites remain accessible and performant during the Olympic rush.

Availability issues on the Olympics homepage

A large crowd of people in a cityDescription automatically generated

The Paris 2024 Olympics website is the central hub for all event-related information, ticket sales, and live updates.

Alarmingly, during our tests, we detected multiple HTTP 404 responses on the Paris Olympics homepage and partner sites. These errors have the potential to severely disrupt user experience, leading to frustration, lost engagement, and diminished trust in the site.  

A screenshot of a websiteDescription automatically generated

Inconsistent network performance

The Olympics homepage shows varying round trip times (RTTs) across different countries. Belgium, New Zealand, and Singapore had the lowest RTTs, indicating top-tier network performance.

However, Countries like India, Sweden, and Italy have higher RTTs, which may significantly impact the user experience for visitors accessing the site.

Round Trip Time (RTT) across different countries

A graph of different colored barsDescription automatically generated

Round trip time anomalies:

  • Ping round trip times for connections established via Level3 from Germany and the United States are higher than those from other countries using the same ISP.
  • This discrepancy is due to inter-country routing, as the Sankey chart illustrates.
  • Traffic from Level3 Germany is routed through Chingford, UK (AS9002), while traffic from Level3 USA detours via El Paso, US (AS174), and Mexico (AS8151) before reaching the destination in the originating city.

A white rectangular object with black textDescription automatically generated

Screenshot: Traffic originating from Berlin

A white rectangular object with black textDescription automatically generated

Screenshot: Traffic originating from Los Angeles

Regional response time issues

A graph showing different colored squaresDescription automatically generated

As seen in the chart above, there are clear regional disparities in network performance.

The Paris Olympics homepage had a significantly faster response time in Europe. North America showed mixed results, with the U.S. outperforming Canada. Africa and South America have the highest response times, indicating potential network performance issues or distance-related delays that could affect user experience in this region.

Top 10 ISPs based on response time

Bottom 10 ISPs based on response time

Response time for the Olympics landing page largely depends on wait and load times. As these metrics increase, so does response time across regions. Europe, particularly the Netherlands and the UK, shows the best performance. In contrast, India, Australia, and parts of North America face challenges with higher response times.  

The significant differences in response times across regions highlight the need for targeted optimization strategies to ensure a consistent and seamless user experience globally.  

Spotlight on user experience: Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)

A graph showing different colored squaresDescription automatically generated

The Paris Olympics homepage shows varying LCP times across regions. Europe shows moderate LCP times, but countries like Hungary and Finland experience higher delays. North America has mixed results, with the U.S. performing better than Canada. Asia's performance varies, with faster times in Israel and Japan but slower in India.

High LCP Regions: South America, particularly Brazil and Colombia, and Oceania have the highest LCP times, indicating a need for optimization.

Olympics homepage – LCP across different countries

A graph of different colored barsDescription automatically generated

Retail performance challenges on shop.olympics.com

Shop.olympics.com, the official e-commerce platform for Olympic Games merchandise, faces performance challenges resulting in high LCP times of approximately 3-4 seconds. Here are the main reasons:

  • High response time: The server’s slow response is contributing to delayed content loading.
  • Slower render start: Critical resources such as CSS, JavaScript, and images are not loading promptly, delaying the initial render and negatively impacting LCP.
  • Inefficient lazy loading: The main content (LCP element) is being lazy loaded, causing further delays. Ensuring the timely loading of the main content is crucial for better LCP scores.

A screenshot of a computerDescription automatically generated

A screenshot of a computerDescription automatically generated

Screenshot: High Response time and delayed Render start

A group of people wearing sunglassesDescription automatically generated

Screenshot: Lazy Loading of LCP Element
  • As seen in the screenshot, the hero element on the page is being lazy loaded.
  • When the LCP element is lazy loaded, the main image on a web page is not loaded immediately, delaying LCP.

Key partner websites: How well does the supporting cast perform?

Olympic partner websites play a vital role in the games by promoting the event, facilitating ticket sales, showcasing sustainability efforts, digitally transforming operations, and engaging fans through content. These websites serve as gateways for fans, athletes, and stakeholders to connect with the Olympic experience. The performance of these key partner websites is integral to delivering a superior user experience, driving revenue, and maintaining and protecting brand reputation.

Response time disparities among Olympic partner sites

A graph of different colored barsDescription automatically generated

Response times for the Olympics’ partner sites show notable differences.

  • Top Performers: Groupe BPCE and Air France exhibit very low response times, ensuring quick and seamless user experiences.
  • Areas for Improvement: Abatable and Accor have higher response times, particularly in regions like Australia and India, indicating regional connectivity or infrastructure issues.

Addressing user experience metrics: LCP

A graph of different colored linesDescription automatically generated

When it comes to user experience metrics like LCP, the disparities are even more pronounced.

  • Swift loading: Pages like Air France and Groupe BPCE load their main content swiftly, providing a seamless experience.
  • Need for improvement: Partners like Accor and Abatable show room for improvement with higher LCP values.

Ensure Internet Resilience with Catchpoint this Olympics

Our analysis of the Paris Olympics website and its key partner pages highlighted several critical performance challenges. During high traffic, it is crucial to find and fix issues before they affect your business.

That’s where Catchpoint comes in.

Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) enables detailed, global visibility across the Internet Stack – the tangled web of distributed network systems that connect your web applications to your users, including BGP, CDN, and DNS services. Our cloud-native platform ensures Internet Resilience across your organization with five enterprise IPM solutions, including a best-of-breed Website Experience Solution.

Website Experience, powered by Internet Performance Monitoring

Not only does Catchpoint’s Website Experience Solution empower you to monitor your site’s speed, usability, and resilience in real-time across various browsers, devices, and global locations, but it also allows you to rapidly identify and fix performance issues before they impact your business.

Key benefits

Learn more

Summary

As the world gears up for the Paris Olympics, it’s not just athletes who need to be in peak condition.

This Olympics comes hot on the heels of the largest IT outage in history. Recovery efforts from the CrowdStrike outage are still ongoing. Lessons will be learned, no doubt, but at least one takeaway is already evident: the modern web is an oh-so-fragile thing; neglect digital resilience at your peril.

For businesses, especially those partnering with or linked to the Olympics, this period is critical.

Millions of visitors will flock to these sites for updates, scores, and bookings, making it crucial to monitor performance from the end user's perspective.

Given this context, Catchpoint tested the performance of the official Paris Olympics site and key partner pages to ensure they can handle the increased traffic and deliver a seamless user experience during the Olympics. We conducted our tests between 16 and 23 July 2024, focusing on the following performance metrics:

  • Response time: Measures how long it takes for the base HTML of a webpage to load.
  • Round-trip time (RTT): The time it takes for a packet to travel from the source to a destination and back again.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): Measures how long it takes for the largest content element (such as hero images or videos) to load within the user’s viewport.

By monitoring these metrics, organizations can quickly detect and resolve performance issues, ensuring their websites remain accessible and performant during the Olympic rush.

Availability issues on the Olympics homepage

A large crowd of people in a cityDescription automatically generated

The Paris 2024 Olympics website is the central hub for all event-related information, ticket sales, and live updates.

Alarmingly, during our tests, we detected multiple HTTP 404 responses on the Paris Olympics homepage and partner sites. These errors have the potential to severely disrupt user experience, leading to frustration, lost engagement, and diminished trust in the site.  

A screenshot of a websiteDescription automatically generated

Inconsistent network performance

The Olympics homepage shows varying round trip times (RTTs) across different countries. Belgium, New Zealand, and Singapore had the lowest RTTs, indicating top-tier network performance.

However, Countries like India, Sweden, and Italy have higher RTTs, which may significantly impact the user experience for visitors accessing the site.

Round Trip Time (RTT) across different countries

A graph of different colored barsDescription automatically generated

Round trip time anomalies:

  • Ping round trip times for connections established via Level3 from Germany and the United States are higher than those from other countries using the same ISP.
  • This discrepancy is due to inter-country routing, as the Sankey chart illustrates.
  • Traffic from Level3 Germany is routed through Chingford, UK (AS9002), while traffic from Level3 USA detours via El Paso, US (AS174), and Mexico (AS8151) before reaching the destination in the originating city.

A white rectangular object with black textDescription automatically generated

Screenshot: Traffic originating from Berlin

A white rectangular object with black textDescription automatically generated

Screenshot: Traffic originating from Los Angeles

Regional response time issues

A graph showing different colored squaresDescription automatically generated

As seen in the chart above, there are clear regional disparities in network performance.

The Paris Olympics homepage had a significantly faster response time in Europe. North America showed mixed results, with the U.S. outperforming Canada. Africa and South America have the highest response times, indicating potential network performance issues or distance-related delays that could affect user experience in this region.

Top 10 ISPs based on response time

Bottom 10 ISPs based on response time

Response time for the Olympics landing page largely depends on wait and load times. As these metrics increase, so does response time across regions. Europe, particularly the Netherlands and the UK, shows the best performance. In contrast, India, Australia, and parts of North America face challenges with higher response times.  

The significant differences in response times across regions highlight the need for targeted optimization strategies to ensure a consistent and seamless user experience globally.  

Spotlight on user experience: Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)

A graph showing different colored squaresDescription automatically generated

The Paris Olympics homepage shows varying LCP times across regions. Europe shows moderate LCP times, but countries like Hungary and Finland experience higher delays. North America has mixed results, with the U.S. performing better than Canada. Asia's performance varies, with faster times in Israel and Japan but slower in India.

High LCP Regions: South America, particularly Brazil and Colombia, and Oceania have the highest LCP times, indicating a need for optimization.

Olympics homepage – LCP across different countries

A graph of different colored barsDescription automatically generated

Retail performance challenges on shop.olympics.com

Shop.olympics.com, the official e-commerce platform for Olympic Games merchandise, faces performance challenges resulting in high LCP times of approximately 3-4 seconds. Here are the main reasons:

  • High response time: The server’s slow response is contributing to delayed content loading.
  • Slower render start: Critical resources such as CSS, JavaScript, and images are not loading promptly, delaying the initial render and negatively impacting LCP.
  • Inefficient lazy loading: The main content (LCP element) is being lazy loaded, causing further delays. Ensuring the timely loading of the main content is crucial for better LCP scores.

A screenshot of a computerDescription automatically generated

A screenshot of a computerDescription automatically generated

Screenshot: High Response time and delayed Render start

A group of people wearing sunglassesDescription automatically generated

Screenshot: Lazy Loading of LCP Element
  • As seen in the screenshot, the hero element on the page is being lazy loaded.
  • When the LCP element is lazy loaded, the main image on a web page is not loaded immediately, delaying LCP.

Key partner websites: How well does the supporting cast perform?

Olympic partner websites play a vital role in the games by promoting the event, facilitating ticket sales, showcasing sustainability efforts, digitally transforming operations, and engaging fans through content. These websites serve as gateways for fans, athletes, and stakeholders to connect with the Olympic experience. The performance of these key partner websites is integral to delivering a superior user experience, driving revenue, and maintaining and protecting brand reputation.

Response time disparities among Olympic partner sites

A graph of different colored barsDescription automatically generated

Response times for the Olympics’ partner sites show notable differences.

  • Top Performers: Groupe BPCE and Air France exhibit very low response times, ensuring quick and seamless user experiences.
  • Areas for Improvement: Abatable and Accor have higher response times, particularly in regions like Australia and India, indicating regional connectivity or infrastructure issues.

Addressing user experience metrics: LCP

A graph of different colored linesDescription automatically generated

When it comes to user experience metrics like LCP, the disparities are even more pronounced.

  • Swift loading: Pages like Air France and Groupe BPCE load their main content swiftly, providing a seamless experience.
  • Need for improvement: Partners like Accor and Abatable show room for improvement with higher LCP values.

Ensure Internet Resilience with Catchpoint this Olympics

Our analysis of the Paris Olympics website and its key partner pages highlighted several critical performance challenges. During high traffic, it is crucial to find and fix issues before they affect your business.

That’s where Catchpoint comes in.

Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) enables detailed, global visibility across the Internet Stack – the tangled web of distributed network systems that connect your web applications to your users, including BGP, CDN, and DNS services. Our cloud-native platform ensures Internet Resilience across your organization with five enterprise IPM solutions, including a best-of-breed Website Experience Solution.

Website Experience, powered by Internet Performance Monitoring

Not only does Catchpoint’s Website Experience Solution empower you to monitor your site’s speed, usability, and resilience in real-time across various browsers, devices, and global locations, but it also allows you to rapidly identify and fix performance issues before they impact your business.

Key benefits

Learn more

This is some text inside of a div block.

You might also like

SRE Report 2026: What surprised us, what didn't, and why the gaps matter most

The SRE Report 2026: Defensible Ns

Why Synthetic Tracing Delivers Better Data, Not Just More Data