惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
U
Unit 42
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园 - 聂微东
GbyAI
GbyAI
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
D
DataBreaches.Net
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
Jina AI
Jina AI
美团技术团队
The Cloudflare Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
I
InfoQ
S
Schneier on Security
C
Check Point Blog
Project Zero
Project Zero
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
P
Privacy International News Feed
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
Latest news
Latest news
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
S
Secure Thoughts
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
H
Help Net Security
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
A
About on SuperTechFans
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
C
Cisco Blogs
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
H
Hacker News: Front Page
Vercel News
Vercel News

GitHub Enterprise Cloud - EU Status - Incident History

Status Page Migration EU - Investigating Copilot code completions degraded performance EU - Disruption with Copilot Cloud Agent and Copilot Code Review EU - Incident with Actions, Issues and Webhooks EU - Incident with Git Operations EU - Some data not showing in Elastic Search indexes EU - Disruption with users unable to start Claude and Codex agent task from the web EU - Disruption with Copilot chat and Copilot Coding Agent EU - Problems with third-party Claude and Codex Agent sessions not being listed in the agents tab dashboard EU - Copilot Coding Agent failing to start some jobs EU - Incident with Pull Requests: High percentage of 500s EU - Teams Github Notifications App is down EU - Disruption with Copilot Coding Agent Sessions EU - Issues with Copilot Coding Agent EU - Some OpenAI models degraded in Copilot EU - Claude Opus 4.6 Fast not appearing for some Copilot users EU - Incident with Copilot and Actions EU - Delays with Code Scanning and Billing EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Disruption with some GitHub services EU - Copilot Code Review Failing
EU - Incident with Pull Requests
2022-08-01 · via GitHub Enterprise Cloud - EU Status - Incident History

On April 23, 2026, between 16:05 UTC and 20:43 UTC, the Pull Requests service experienced a regression affecting merge queue operations. PRs merged via merge queue using the squash merge method produced incorrect merge commits when the merge group contained more than one PR. In affected cases, changes from previously merged PRs and prior commits were inadvertently reverted by subsequent merges.

During the impact window 2,092 pull requests were affected. The issue did not affect pull requests merged outside of merge queue, nor merge queue groups using the merge or rebase methods.
It took approximately 3 hours and 33 minutes to identify the issue. The change completed deployment at approximately 16:05 UTC, and we became aware at 19:38 UTC following an increase in customer support inquiries. Because the issue affected merge commit correctness rather than availability, it was not detected by existing automated monitoring and was identified through customer reports.

The regression was introduced by a new code path that adjusted merge base computation for merge queue ref updates. This code path was intended to be gated behind a feature flag for an unreleased feature, but the gating was incomplete.

As a result, the new behavior was inadvertently applied to squash merge groups, producing an incorrect three-way merge. This caused subsequent squash merges to revert changes from earlier pull requests and, in some cases, changes between their starting points.

We mitigated the incident by reverting the code change and force-deploying the fix across all environments. After resolution, we identified affected repositories and sent targeted remediation instructions to repository administrators with step-by-step recovery guidance.

The regression was not identified during internal validation. Existing test coverage primarily exercised single-PR merge queue groups, which did not exhibit the faulty base-reference calculation. Because automated checks did not validate merge correctness for multi-PR squash groups, the defect surfaced only in production.

To prevent recurrence, GitHub is expanding test coverage for merge correctness validation. We are broadening automated coverage for merge queue operations, including regression checks that validate resulting Git contents across supported configurations, so issues affecting merge correctness are caught before reaching production.

We are committed to ensuring the correctness and reliability of merge queue operations. These actions will reduce the risk of similar regressions and improve confidence in future changes to the Pull Requests service.

Posted Apr 23, 2026 - 21:43 UTC