惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
爱范儿
爱范儿
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
博客园 - 叶小钗
H
Help Net Security
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
小众软件
小众软件
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 司徒正美
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
量子位
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
V
V2EX
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
博客园 - 【当耐特】
J
Java Code Geeks
D
DataBreaches.Net
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI

Yi's Blog

三年LLM:过去和未来 Color Recreation from First Principles 《死亡搁浅》玩后感及艺术评论思考 Review on ASUS Zenbook S14 Laptop (LNL) with Linux
LLM will NEVER be AGI: The Proof
Yi Cao · 2024-08-20 · via Yi's Blog

The proof is trivial with a little help of a necessary condition of complexity theories. All LLM runs under the complexity of $O(n)$, where $n$ is the length of the output.

Suppose LLM is AGI, then it is able to solve any problem that a human can solve. Consider the following problem:

Given a string $s$ of length $n$, determine whether $s$ is a palindrome. Answer “Y” if it is and “N” if it isn’t.

Apprently, a human can solve this problem, and it is easy to prove that the problem must be solved in at least $O(n)$ time.

Since the output of this problem is of a constant length, LLM must solve this problem in $O(1)$ time, which is a contradiction. Thus LLM cannot solve a problem that a human can solve. Therefore LLM is not AGI. $\blacksquare$

EDIT: Chain of Thoughts breaks the proof, allowing LLM to solve the problem in arbitrary time.

This post is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 by the author.