惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
DataBreaches.Net
B
Blog
博客园_首页
C
Check Point Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
B
Blog RSS Feed
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
The Cloudflare Blog
量子位
V
V2EX
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
I
InfoQ
博客园 - 【当耐特】

Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

AI can't read an investor deck AI as an attorney? Student uses ChatGPT, Gemini to sue UW over alleged racial discrimination Hacking MCP Servers in AI Systems – The Rug Pull: Tool Changes After Approval GitHub - MeepCastana/KubeezCut: Free Web based video editor Can AI judge journalism? A Thiel-backed startup says yes, even if it risks chilling whistleblowers Coming soon: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims What explains heterogeneity in AI adoption? When AI Meets Muscle: Context-Aware Electrical Stimulation Promises a New Way to Guide Human Movements - Department of Computer Science AI Changed How We Build. It Did Not Change What Matters. Linux rules on using AI-generated code - Copilot is OK, but humans must take 'full responsibility for the… Meta spins up AI version of Mark Zuckerberg to engage with employees Code Mode: Let Your AI Write Programs, Not Just Call Tools | TanStack Blog GitHub - Delavalom/graft: Go framework for building AI agents. Type-safe tools, multi-provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock), zero vendor SDKs. India's TCS tops estimates, says new AI models did not dent services demand Gen Z's fading AI hype Strong feeling: we are in a folded AI reality GitHub - machinarii/total-recall-catalog: A reference catalog of latest knowledge retrieval, memory & RAG systems GitHub - mensfeld/code-on-incus: Give each AI agent its own isolated machine with root, Docker, and systemd. Active defense detects and stops threats automatically.. Quantization, LoRA, and the 8% Problem: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Production AI Iran war: We spoke to the man making Lego-style AI videos that experts say are powerful propaganda Powell, Bessent discussed Anthropic's Mythos AI cyber threat with major U.S. banks GitHub - immartian/bellamem: Persistent belief-graph memory for AI agents. Retrieves decisive context by importance — not recency, not RAG, not /compact. recursive-mode: The Repo-Native Operating System for AI Engineering After the attack on Sam Altman's home, will AI CEO's go on the offensive? The biggest advance in AI since the LLM Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 One Prompt Unity World Generation Test “AI polls” are fake polls Client Challenge Can AI be a 'child of God'? Inside Anthropic's meeting with Christian leaders
Build Your Own AI Agent CLI in 150 Lines
asim · 2026-06-02 · via Hacker News - Newest: "AI"

Building an AI agent CLI

May 30, 2026 • By the Go Micro Team

We introduced micro chat — a CLI that lets you talk to your microservices through an LLM. People asked how it works under the hood. The honest answer: it’s about 150 lines, and there’s no magic. This post walks through every piece so you can build your own — for go-micro, for your own framework, or for whatever services you have.

By the end, you’ll understand the four moving parts of any tool-calling agent and have working code you can adapt.

The Problem

You have services. They do things — create users, send emails, query orders. You want to ask for those things in plain English and have the right service called automatically.

An LLM can do the reasoning (“the user wants to send an email, so call the email service”), but it needs three things from you:

  1. A list of tools it can call, with descriptions and parameters
  2. A way to execute a tool when it picks one
  3. Conversation memory so follow-up questions make sense

That’s the whole problem. Let’s solve each part.

The LLM needs to know what’s available. In go-micro, every service registers its endpoints with the registry, including request types and field metadata. We turn that into a tool list:

tools := ai.NewTools(reg, ai.ToolClient(client))
discovered, err := tools.Discover()

discovered is a []ai.Tool — one per service endpoint. Each has a name (users_Users_Create), a description (from the handler’s doc comment), and a parameter schema (from the request struct’s fields).

If you’re not using go-micro, this is the part you’d write yourself: enumerate your functions/endpoints and build a list of {name, description, parameters}. The registry just makes it automatic.

Part 2: Create the Model

m := ai.New("anthropic",
    ai.WithAPIKey(apiKey),
    ai.WithTools(tools),
)

Two things happen here. ai.New picks the provider (Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, etc. — all the same interface). ai.WithTools(tools) wires up the execution side: when the model says “call users_Users_Create with these args,” the handler routes it to the right RPC and returns the result.

That’s the second piece — the way to execute. The Tools object does double duty: Discover() builds the list, and its handler executes the calls.

Part 3: Track the Conversation

hist := ai.NewHistory(50)

History is a plain message accumulator with a size limit. It’s not magic — it’s a []Message with Add, Messages, and Reset. You add the user’s prompt and the model’s reply after each turn, and pass the accumulated messages back on the next call. That’s how follow-up questions work.

Part 4: The Loop

Now wire it together. The core of ask is just this:

func ask(ctx context.Context, m ai.Model, hist *ai.History, tools []ai.Tool, prompt string) error {
    hist.Add("user", prompt)

    resp, err := m.Generate(ctx, &ai.Request{
        Prompt:       prompt,
        SystemPrompt: systemPrompt,
        Tools:        tools,
        Messages:     hist.Messages(),
    })
    if err != nil {
        return err
    }

    if resp.Reply != "" {
        hist.Add("assistant", resp.Reply)
        fmt.Println(resp.Reply)
    }
    for _, tc := range resp.ToolCalls {
        args, _ := json.Marshal(tc.Input)
        fmt.Printf("  → called %s(%s)\n", tc.Name, args)
    }
    if resp.Answer != "" {
        hist.Add("assistant", resp.Answer)
        fmt.Println(resp.Answer)
    }
    return nil
}

Read it top to bottom:

  1. Record the prompt in history
  2. Call the model with the prompt, the system instruction, the tool list, and the conversation so far
  3. Print the reply and record it
  4. Show which tools were called (the model decides, the handler executes — we just report)
  5. Print the final answer after tools ran

The model’s Generate does the heavy lifting: it decides whether to call tools, the handler (from step 2 of setup) executes them, and the model produces a final answer. We never wrote any “if user wants email, call email service” logic. The LLM does that reasoning from the tool descriptions.

The REPL

Wrap ask in a read-loop and you have a chat:

scanner := bufio.NewScanner(os.Stdin)
for {
    fmt.Print("> ")
    if !scanner.Scan() {
        return nil
    }
    line := strings.TrimSpace(scanner.Text())
    switch line {
    case "":
        continue
    case "exit", "quit":
        return nil
    case "reset":
        hist.Reset()
        continue
    default:
        if err := ask(ctx, m, hist, discovered, line); err != nil {
            fmt.Printf("error: %v\n", err)
        }
    }
}

That’s it. Discover tools, create a model, track history, loop. Four pieces.

Why It’s So Short

The brevity comes from the framework doing the right things:

  • Services are self-describing. Doc comments become tool descriptions. The @example tag gives the LLM a usage hint. You don’t hand-write tool schemas.
// CreateUser creates a new user account.
// @example {"name": "Alice", "email": "alice@example.com"}
func (h *Users) CreateUser(ctx context.Context, req *pb.CreateRequest, rsp *pb.CreateResponse) error {
    // ...
}
  • Providers are uniform. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Groq, Mistral, Together, Atlas Cloud — all behind one ai.Model interface. Switching is one string.

  • Execution is wired automatically. ai.WithTools(tools) connects tool calls to RPC dispatch. No glue.

If you stripped go-micro out and built this against raw HTTP services, you’d add maybe 50 lines: a function to enumerate your endpoints and a function to call one by name. Everything else stays the same.

Make It Yours

The 150 lines are a starting point. Ideas for extending it:

  • Add a confirmation step before destructive tool calls (“This will delete 3 records. Continue?”)
  • Log every tool call to an audit trail or your observability stack
  • Filter the tool list so the agent only sees certain services
  • Swap the REPL for a Slack bot — same ask, different input source
  • Pre-load a system prompt with domain knowledge about your services
  • Trigger it from events instead of stdin — that’s exactly what micro flow does

The point of micro chat was never to be a finished product. It’s a demonstration that turning services into an agent is a small, comprehensible amount of code — not a framework you have to learn, just a pattern you can copy.

Try It, Then Read It

go install go-micro.dev/v5/cmd/micro@latest
micro run                                          # start your services
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-... micro chat --provider anthropic

The full source is cmd/micro/chat/chat.go — about 220 lines including flags, help text, and provider env-var handling. The agent core is the ~40 lines you saw above.

Build your own. It’s more approachable than you think.


Go Micro is an open source framework for distributed systems development. Star us on GitHub.