惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

月光博客
月光博客
D
Docker
腾讯CDC
J
Java Code Geeks
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
The Cloudflare Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
博客园 - Franky
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
F
Fortinet All Blogs
IT之家
IT之家
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
爱范儿
爱范儿
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
小众软件
小众软件
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
博客园 - 【当耐特】

GitHub Status - Incident History

Incident with Actions and Pull Requests Disruption with GitHub Billing Disruption with some GitHub services Actions delays in starting runs Elevated errors on Fable 5 due to upstream provider Degraded Git Operations over SSH Intermittent failures creating agent tasks Incident with Actions Intermittent failures in runner group and runner-related permissions pages Incident with GitHub.com Disruption with GHEC Team Sync Errors with the Fable 5 Model in Copilot Incident with Webhooks Disruption with Login and Release Asset downloads Incident with Pull Requests and Issues Incident with GraphQL API Requests Disruption with Copilot for access to some models Disruption with creation of fine grained personal access tokens Incident with Pages - Deployment Lag Incident with Actions Some Copilot Cloud Agent jobs not starting Incident with Copilot Incident with Copilot AI Model Providers Degraded availability GPT 5.6 Luna Copilot model Claude Fable 5 experiencing elevated errors Incident with Copilot AI Model Providers Incident with Actions Test Incident Posted in Error – No Customer Impact (Will Be Removed) Incident with GraphQL API Requests Actions run failures and delays
Incomplete pull request results in repositories
2026-05-01 · via GitHub Status - Incident History

On April 28, 2026, at approximately 14:07 UTC, GitHub received reports that pull requests were missing from search results across global and repository /pulls pages.

The issue was caused by a manually invoked repair job intended for a single repository, which was executed without the required safety flags. During execution of the repair job, the database query remained correctly scoped to the repo’s PR IDs. However, the Elasticsearch reconciliation logic did not apply the same scope. It interpreted the min and max PR IDs as a continuous range, causing unrelated PR documents across other repos to be marked for deletion. This resulted in the removal of 1,789,756,838 PR documents from the search index, approximately 49% of indexed PR documents.

Customer impact was limited to PR search and list discoverability. Primary storage was unaffected, and there was no impact to opening, updating, or merging PRs.

The issue was identified ~10 minutes after initial customer reports. Because it affected search index completeness rather than service availability, it was not caught by existing monitoring.

The root cause was a flaw in the search document repair framework: it allowed a scoped reconciliation to run without enforcing a matching Elasticsearch query scope. This created a destructive mismatch between the source-of-truth and the index. The issue was compounded by the ability to trigger the job from the production console without safety defaults. Prior testing focused only on safe backfill scenarios and did not cover this reconciliation path. Additionally, there was no automated detection for large-volume deletions in Elasticsearch.

We mitigated the incident through three parallel actions: (1) Deployed a MySQL-backed search fallback for the most active repos by traffic to restore PR visibility for highly impacted users (2) Initiated a snapshot restore and reindex process to repopulate missing pull request documents in Elasticsearch (3) Added a degradation notice on PR pages to inform users of incomplete search results while recovery was in progress. The incident was resolved on May 1, 2026 at 4:15 UTC, following completion and validation of the reindex process.

To prevent recurrence, we are prioritizing improvements to the repair framework and safeguards. These include enforcing scoped query alignment between primary storage and Elasticsearch, preventing destructive operations without explicit opt-in, strengthening guardrails for manual repair jobs, and evaluating restrictions on production console access.

In parallel, we are expanding automated test coverage for reconciliation safety invariants and introducing detection for anomalous deletion patterns in Elasticsearch so similar issues can be identified or blocked earlier.

We are committed to improving the safety and reliability of our repair systems and ensuring that operational workflows are resilient to both software defects and manual invocation risks.

Posted May 01, 2026 - 04:15 UTC