惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
博客园 - 司徒正美
D
DataBreaches.Net
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - 【当耐特】
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - Franky
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
IT之家
IT之家
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
J
Java Code Geeks
腾讯CDC
博客园_首页
The Cloudflare Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
C
Check Point Blog
美团技术团队
爱范儿
爱范儿
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
A
About on SuperTechFans
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale

math updates on arXiv.org

Coupling-Robust Accuracy in Multiphysics Physics Informed Neural Networks via Kronecker-Preconditioned Optimization Non-normal spectral signatures of instability in neural network training dynamics Optimization of randomized neural networks for transfer operator approximation Selective Ambulance Dispatch Under Contextual Travel-Time Uncertainty LLAMA LIMA: A Living Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Generative AI on Learning Mathematics Neural Flow Operators can Approximate any Operator: Abstract Frameworks and Universal Approximations LLMs as Noisy Channels: A Shannon Perspective on Model Capacity and Scaling Laws On the Stability of Spherical Hellinger-Kantorovich Flows and Their Implications for Differential Privacy Training-Free Looped Transformers Move on Muon : A Hamiltonian probability gradient flow perspective of Muon optimizer Entrywise Error Bounds for Spectral Ranking with Semi-Random Adversaries Asymmetric Scaling Laws from Sparse Features Is Dimensionality a Barrier for Retrieval Models? RA-DCA: A Randomized Active-Set DCA for Directional Stationarity in Max-Structured DC Programs Commutator-Induced Uncertainty in VAEs Weisfeiler-Leman Is Incomplete on Simple Spectrum Graphs, so Canonicalize Them Sparse In-Network Learning via Shortest-Path Backpropagation and Finite-Rate Gating Instance-Optimal Estimation with Multiple LLM Judges on a Budget Entropy Equivalence Testing Expand More, Shrink Less: Shaping Effective-Rank Dynamics for Dense Scaling in Recommendation Any-Dimensional Invariant Universality Operationalizing Individual Fairness via Gradient Descent and Bradley-Terry Models Anytime Training with Schedule-Free Spectral Optimization Diffusion-based Denoising Beats Vanilla Score Matching in Parameter Estimation: A Theoretical Explanation Resilience Characterization of AI-Native Wireless Receivers via Persistent Homology The General Theory of Localization Methods Group-Algebraic Tensors: Provably-optimal Equivariant Learning and Physical Symmetry Discovery General Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Federated Learning with Arbitrary Public-Transcript Interactions PilotWiMAE: Pilot-Native Representation Learning for Wireless Channels Proximal basin hopping: global optimization with guarantees
Undecidability, Chaos and Universality in Arithmetic Terms
[Submitted on 8 Jun 2026 (v1), last revised 25 Jun 2026 (this ve · 2026-06-26 · via math updates on arXiv.org

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Arithmetic terms are finite fixed compositions of additions, subtractions, multiplications, divisions with remainder and exponentiations, containing variables interpreted as natural numbers. They build a well-defined notion of closed formula. It is known that every Kalmar elementary function can be expressed as an arithmetic term. In this paper, one studies the power of expression of the arithmetic terms. By interpreting Hilbert's Tenth Problem in arithmetic terms, it is shown that it is undecidable whether one-variable arithmetic term takes the value $0$, or whether two such terms take or not the same values. An algorithm constructs the arithmetic term representing an arbitrary function, which has been defined by a recurrence rule. This construction has various applications. Functions with chaotic behavior, like the Logistic Map, can be expressed as arithmetic terms. Finally, we construct a Turing complete arithmetic term and we express a Turing universal function by an arithmetic term. A somewhat unexpected application: there is a {\it wise} arithmetic term. It gets (the code of) a sentence, (the code of) a formalized theory and a bound $B$, and after performing a constant number of operations, it outputs (the code of) a proof of the sentence using the given theory if such a proof does exist and its length is less than $B$. Otherwise, it outputs $0$.

Submission history

From: Mihai Prunescu [view email]
[v1] Mon, 8 Jun 2026 11:03:48 UTC (31 KB)
[v2] Thu, 25 Jun 2026 13:45:11 UTC (29 KB)