The robust safety of Vision-Language Large Models (VLLMs) against joint multilingual and multimodal threats remains severely underexplored. Current benchmarks typically isolate these dimensions, being either multilingual but text-only, or multimodal but monolingual. While recent red-teaming efforts attempt to bridge this gap by rendering harmful prompts as images, their overreliance on typography-style visuals and lack of semantically grounded image-text pairs fail to capture realistic cross-modal interactions under multilingual and multimodal conditions. To address this, we introduce Lingua-SafetyBench, a comprehensive benchmark of 100,440 harmful image-text pairs spanning 10 languages. Crucially, Lingua-SafetyBench explicitly partitions data into image-dominant and text-dominant subsets to precisely disentangle sources of risk. Extensive evaluations reveal that current VLLMs retain non-negligible vulnerabilities under these joint inputs. Linguistically, requests in Non-High-Resource Languages (Non-HRLs) and non-Latin scripts generally pose greater threats. Furthermore, analyzing modality-language interactions uncovers a striking asymmetry: in High-Resource Languages (HRLs), models are most vulnerable to image-dominant risks, whereas in Non-HRLs, text-dominant risks severely degrade safety performance. Finally, a controlled study on the Qwen series demonstrates that while model scaling and iterative upgrades improve overall safety, they disproportionately benefit HRLs. This exacerbates the safety disparity between HRLs and Non-HRLs under text-dominant risks, highlighting that achieving robust safety requires dedicated language- and modality-aware alignment strategies beyond mere scaling. The code and dataset will be available at https://github.com/zsxr15/Lingua-SafetyBench.Warning: this paper contains examples with unsafe content.