Second Lady Usha Vance has mocked The New York Times after the paper examined the supposed political meaning of a coral maternity dress she bought from Old Navy for less than $10.

Vance, who is expecting her fourth child with Vice President JD Vance, took aim at the newspaper after its fashion critic used a Father's Day video of the couple to examine what it described as the wider political messaging around prominent pregnant women in the Trump administration.

But the Second Lady punctured the high-brow analysis with a receipt.

'Now that we know the political significance of my $8.75 coral maternity dress from Old Navy, can't wait to hear what the New York Times has to say about my elastic-waistband pants and compression socks!' Vance wrote on X.

She accompanied the post with a screenshot showing the dress had originally been priced at $49.99 before being marked down to $12.49, with a further $3.74 taken off through promotional discounts.

The piece, written by Times fashion critic Vanessa Friedman, was titled The Politics and Power of the Pregnancy Image and examined the public pregnancies of Vance, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt and Katie Miller, wife of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.

Friedman's column began with an Instagram Reel shared by the Vances for Father's Day.

In the clip, Usha Vance tells her husband that their growing family means he will have many more years of reading to children.

'Luckily, there's going to be a new baby for you to read to,' she says in the video. 'So you're going to have many more years ahead of you.'

JD Vance replies: 'I was not yet ready to be out of the baby phase, so here we are, about to jump right in, in just a few short weeks.'

Friedman noted that Usha Vance was wearing a 'stretchy coral dress' that emphasized her pregnancy and said the video offered a particularly direct public introduction to the couple's coming arrival.

She also pointed to Leavitt's recent birth of her second child and Katie Miller's birth of her fourth child, describing the three pregnancies as coincidental but significant in the context of the administration's wider image-making.

'That three such prominent women in the MAGA movement were pregnant at pretty much the same time was, indubitably, a coincidence,' Friedman wrote.

But she argued the pregnancies had nevertheless created a 'consistent' public picture of the White House's family and fertility agenda.

'If the bare-chested, muscled mixed martial arts fighters of the U.F.C. match that President Trump hosted on Flag Day were the poster guys for MAGA's image of masculinity,' Friedman wrote, 'then the pregnant women of Trump world are one half of their feminine counterparts.'

The columnist said Usha Vance's pregnancy also helped present a more personal side of the vice president.

'As second lady, her job is also to represent and humanize the vice president,' Friedman wrote. 'By spotlighting her pregnancy, she is doing exactly that.'