惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
Docker
I
InfoQ
L
LangChain Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园_首页
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
A
About on SuperTechFans
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Vercel News
Vercel News
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
C
Check Point Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
B
Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
F
Fortinet All Blogs
月光博客
月光博客
GbyAI
GbyAI

Ethereum Foundation Blog

Checkpoint #9: Apr 2026 | Ethereum Foundation Blog How L1 and L2s can build the strongest possible Ethereum | Ethereum Foundation Blog The Promise of Ethereum: Introducing the EF Mandate | Ethereum Foundation Blog This Is Fine (Until the Grant Runs Out) | Ethereum Foundation Blog Treasury Staking Initiative | Ethereum Foundation Blog The Ethereum Foundation's Commitment to DeFi | Ethereum Foundation Blog Protocol Priorities Update for 2026 | Ethereum Foundation Blog Announcing the Platform Team at EF | Ethereum Foundation Blog Ethereum Protocol Studies 2026 | Ethereum Foundation Blog Executive Leadership Update | Ethereum Foundation Blog An update from Tomasz | Ethereum Foundation Blog Introducing the EF Academic Secretariat 2026 PhD Fellowship | Ethereum Foundation Blog Trillion Dollar Security Day at Devconnect | Ethereum Foundation Blog Allocation Update - Q4 2025 | Ethereum Foundation Blog Checkpoint #8: Jan 2026 | Ethereum Foundation Blog Devcon 8 is coming to Mumbai, India in November 2026 | Ethereum Foundation Blog Hegota Upgrade EIP Proposal Timelines | Ethereum Foundation Blog Shipping an L1 zkEVM #2: The Security Foundations | Ethereum Foundation Blog The Future of Ethereum’s State | Ethereum Foundation Blog Devconnect Argentina Recap | Ethereum Foundation Blog Allocation Update - Q3 2025 | Ethereum Foundation Blog Making Ethereum Feel Like One Chain Again | Ethereum Foundation Blog Checkpoint #7: Nov 2025 | Ethereum Foundation Blog Fusaka Mainnet Announcement | Ethereum Foundation Blog 2 weeks to Devconnect: Everything you need to know | Ethereum Foundation Blog Unveiling ESP's New Grants Program | Ethereum Foundation Blog Fusaka Update – Transaction Gas Limit Cap arrives with EIP-7825 | Ethereum Foundation Blog Fusaka Update - Information for Blob users | Ethereum Foundation Blog Announcing the 2026 EF Internship | Ethereum Foundation Blog Supporting privacy with new funding mechanisms | Ethereum Foundation Blog
Solidity 0.6.x features: try/catch statement | Ethereum F...
2020-01-29 · via Ethereum Foundation Blog

The try/catch syntax introduced in 0.6.0 is arguably the biggest leap in error handling capabilities in Solidity, since reason strings for revert and require were released in v0.4.22. Both try and catch have been reserved keywords since v0.5.9 and now we can use them to handle failures in external function calls without rolling back the complete transaction (state changes in the called function are still rolled back, but the ones in the calling function are not).

We are moving one step away from the purist "all-or-nothing" approach in a transaction lifecycle, which falls short of practical behaviour we often want.

Handling external call failures

The try/catch statement allows you to react on failed external calls and contract creation calls, so you cannot use it for internal function calls. Note that to wrap a public function call within the same contract with try/catch, it can be made external by calling the function with this..

The example below demonstrates how try/catch is used in a factory pattern where contract creation might fail. The following CharitySplitter contract requires a mandatory address property _owner in its constructor.

pragma solidity ^0.6.1;

contract CharitySplitter {
    address public owner;
    constructor (address _owner) public {
        require(_owner != address(0), "no-owner-provided");
        owner = _owner;
    }
}

There is a factory contract — CharitySplitterFactory which is used to create and manage instances of CharitySplitter. In the factory we can wrap the new CharitySplitter(charityOwner) in a try/catch as a failsafe for when that constructor might fail because of an empty charityOwner being passed.

pragma solidity ^0.6.1;
import "./CharitySplitter.sol";
contract CharitySplitterFactory {
    mapping (address => CharitySplitter) public charitySplitters;
    uint public errorCount;
    event ErrorHandled(string reason);
    event ErrorNotHandled(bytes reason);
    function createCharitySplitter(address charityOwner) public {
        try new CharitySplitter(charityOwner)
            returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
        {
            charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        } catch {
            errorCount++;
        }
    }
}

Note that with try/catch, only exceptions happening inside the external call itself are caught. Errors inside the expression are not caught, for example if the input parameter for the new CharitySplitter is itself part of an internal call, any errors it raises will not be caught. Sample demonstrating this behaviour is the modified createCharitySplitter function. Here the CharitySplitter constructor input parameter is retrieved dynamically from another function — getCharityOwner. If that function reverts, in this example with "revert-required-for-testing", that will not be caught in the try/catch statement.

function createCharitySplitter(address _charityOwner) public {
    try new CharitySplitter(getCharityOwner(_charityOwner, false))
        returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
    {
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
    } catch (bytes memory reason) {
        ...
    }
}
function getCharityOwner(address _charityOwner, bool _toPass)
        internal returns (address) {
    require(_toPass, "revert-required-for-testing");
    return _charityOwner;
}

Retrieving the error message

We can further extend the try/catch logic in the createCharitySplitter function to retrieve the error message if one was emitted by a failing revert or require and emit it in an event. There are two ways to achieve this:

1. Using catch Error(string memory reason)

function createCharitySplitter(address _charityOwner) public {
    try new CharitySplitter(_charityOwner) returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
    {
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
    }
    catch Error(string memory reason)
    {
        errorCount++;
        CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter = new
            CharitySplitter(msg.sender);
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
        // Emitting the error in event
        emit ErrorHandled(reason);
    }
    catch
    {
        errorCount++;
    }
}

Which emits the following event on a failed constructor require error:

CharitySplitterFactory.ErrorHandled(
    reason: 'no-owner-provided' (type: string)
)

2. Using catch (bytes memory reason)

function createCharitySplitter(address charityOwner) public {
    try new CharitySplitter(charityOwner)
        returns (CharitySplitter newCharitySplitter)
    {
        charitySplitters[msg.sender] = newCharitySplitter;
    }
    catch (bytes memory reason) {
        errorCount++;
        emit ErrorNotHandled(reason);
    }
}

Which emits the following event on a failed constructor require error:

CharitySplitterFactory.ErrorNotHandled(
  reason: hex'08c379a0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000116e6f2d6f776e65722d70726f7669646564000000000000000000000000000000' (type: bytes)

The above two methods for retrieving the error string produce a similar result. The difference is that the second method does not ABI-decode the error string. The advantage of the second method is that it is also executed if ABI decoding the error string fails or if no reason was provided.

Future plans

There are plans to release support for error types meaning we will be able to declare errors in a similar way to events allowing us to catch different type of errors, for example:

catch CustomErrorA(uint data1) {}
catch CustomErrorB(uint[] memory data2) {}
catch {}