惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
博客园_首页
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
罗磊的独立博客
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
IT之家
IT之家
D
Docker
爱范儿
爱范儿
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园 - Franky
L
LangChain Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
K
Kaspersky official blog
Latest news
Latest news
博客园 - 聂微东
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
D
DataBreaches.Net
Project Zero
Project Zero
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
G
Google Developers Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
C
Check Point Blog
S
Schneier on Security
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
T
Tor Project blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
U
Unit 42
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale

EU Artificial Intelligence Act

The Advisory Forum: What Is It And How Does It Work? The EU AI Act’s Transparency Rules: A Practical Guide to Article 50 The EU AI Act’s Transparency Rules: A Practical Guide to Article 50 Enforcement of Chapter V under the EU AI Act Enforcement of Chapter V under the EU AI Act What the EU AI Act Means for Staffing Businesses What the EU AI Act Means for Staffing Businesses Modifying AI Under the EU AI Act: Lessons from Practice on Classification and Compliance Modifying AI Under the EU AI Act: Lessons from Practice on Classification and Compliance Whistleblowing and the EU AI Act Whistleblowing and the EU AI Act Overview of Guidelines for GPAI Models Overview of Guidelines for GPAI Models Overview of the Code of Practice Overview of the Code of Practice Why Join the EU AI Scientific Panel? Why Join the EU AI Scientific Panel? AI Literacy Programs in Europe – Supporting Article 4 of the EU AI Act AI Literacy Programs in Europe – Supporting Article 4 of the EU AI Act AI Regulatory Sandbox Approaches: EU Member State Overview Providers of General-Purpose AI Models — What We Know About Who Will Qualify Providers of General-Purpose AI Models — What We Know About Who Will Qualify Small Businesses’ Guide to the AI Act Small Businesses’ Guide to the AI Act Job Opportunities at the European AI Office for Legal and Policy Backgrounds Job Opportunities at the European AI Office for Legal and Policy Backgrounds The AI Office is hiring a Lead Scientific Advisor for AI The AI Office is hiring a Lead Scientific Advisor for AI Overview of all AI Act National Implementation Plans Overview of all AI Act National Implementation Plans The AI Act: Responsibilities of the European Commission (AI Office) The AI Act: Responsibilities of the European Commission (AI Office) The AI Act: Responsibilities of the EU Member States The AI Act: Responsibilities of the EU Member States An Introduction to the Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI An Introduction to the Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI Why work at the EU AI Office? Why work at the EU AI Office? Robust governance for the AI Act: Insights and highlights from Novelli et al. (2024) Robust governance for the AI Act: Insights and highlights from Novelli et al. (2024) The AI Office is hiring The AI Office is hiring The AI Office: What is it, and how does it work? The AI Office: What is it, and how does it work? AI Act Implementation: Timelines & Next steps AI Act Implementation: Timelines & Next steps High-level summary of the AI Act High-level summary of the AI Act Standard Setting | EU Artificial Intelligence Act Standard Setting | EU Artificial Intelligence Act
AI Regulatory Sandbox Approaches: EU Member State Overview
Taylor Jones · 2025-05-02 · via EU Artificial Intelligence Act

AI regulatory sandboxes are an important part of the implementation of the EU AI Act. According to Article 57 of the AI Act, each Member State must establish at least one AI regulatory sandbox at the national level by 2 August 2026. This post provides an overview of how different EU Member States are approaching the design and implementation of these sandboxes, as well as of EU-wide initiatives that support them.


This resource is a work in progress, and will be updated when new information is available. Please help us ensure the completeness and accuracy of this content by contributing any information you have about the authorities in your area: santeri@futureoflife.org.

AI regulatory sandboxes create controlled environments where AI systems can be developed and tested with regulatory guidance before market release. They improve legal certainty, support compliance, allow for processing of personal data, and facilitate market access for SMEs and startups. Importantly, the documentation from participating in a sandbox can be used to demonstrate compliance with the AI Act. Further, providers will not face administrative fines for infringements of the Act, as long as they follow the guidance of the national competent authority. Note that providers remain liable for damages to third parties caused by experimentation with AI systems in a sandbox.

Lessons from other fields highlight some potential positive impacts of regulatory sandboxes. For instance, companies that completed successful testing within the UK FCA sandbox received 6.6 times more fintech investment than their peers. Further, the UK FCA sandbox reduced the average time required for market authorisation by 40% compared to the regulator’s typical approval process.

The implementation status of the sandboxes varies significantly across Member States. Some, such as Denmark, have operational sandboxes and concrete plans, while others remain in early planning stages. Institutional approaches also differ: in some Member States, data protection authorities are leading the effort; elsewhere, new centralised AI agencies are being established. Some Member States are opting for decentralised models that coordinate existing regulators.

Quick summary of AI regulatory sandboxes under Articles 57-59:

  • AI regulatory sandboxes are frameworks for testing AI systems in controlled environments that foster innovation and facilitate development, training, testing, and validation before market entry.
  • Sandboxes aim to improve legal certainty, support sharing of best practices, foster innovation, contribute to evidence-based regulatory learning, and facilitate market access, particularly for SMEs and startups. Providers may use documentation from participating in a sandbox to demonstrate their compliance with the EU AI Act.
  • Each Member State must establish at least one AI regulatory sandbox by 2 August 2026. The national sandbox may also be done jointly with other Member States.
  • National competent authorities provide guidance, supervision, and support to identify risks and ensure compliance with the AI Act and other relevant legislation.
  • Providers participating in sandboxes remain liable under applicable liability laws but are protected from administrative fines if they follow sandbox guidelines in good faith.
  • Providers may process personal data in sandboxes for projects serving the public interest if the data is necessary, kept secure, not shared externally, and deleted after use. They must manage risks, document activities, and publish a summary unless sensitive law enforcement data is involved.
  • National competent authorities must coordinate their activities through the AI Board and submit annual reports on sandbox implementation.
  • SMEs and startups can access AI sandboxes free of charge, though national authorities may recover fair and proportionate exceptional costs.

EU-wide support initiatives

At the EU level, several initiatives are underway to support the implementation of AI regulatory sandboxes across Member States. Their role is specified in the EU AI Act: Article 58(3) states that prospective providers in the AI regulatory sandboxes, in particular SMEs and start-ups, shall be directed, where relevant, to value-adding services such as Testing and Experimentation Facilities and European Digital Innovation Hubs. This connection is important because regulatory sandboxes are not intended solely for supporting compliance with the AI Act, but also to foster the development and testing of AI systems. This includes providing innovators with access to training, technical expertise, and infrastructure. Since the EU has already invested substantial funding for these purposes, it is important to ensure connections between regulatory sandboxes and existing instruments.

Free, independent, and here to stay.

Our goal is to build the most useful, authoritative, and comprehensive guide to the AI Act anywhere on the internet. We’ll never put this behind a paywall or use it to sell you a service. We do this because we think good AI governance matters, and that means making authoritative guidance genuinely accessible.

If you want to help us out, please consider contributing a guest post to help others understand and navigate the Act, or send your ideas and feedback for the website to me (Taylor, Design & Web Manager) at: websites@futureoflife.org. To stay up-to-date, subscribe to our bi-weekly AI Act newsletter, the world’s most trusted regular AI Act publication with over 50,000+ subscribers. We’ve published over 100 updates since 2022.

This website is built and maintained by the Future of Life Institute — the world’s oldest and largest nonprofit working for the responsible development of AI.

The EU Regulatory Sandboxes for AI (EUSAiR)

One of the key initiatives is the EU Regulatory Sandboxes for AI (EUSAiR), a two-year project funded by the European Union’s Digital Europe programme working in cooperation with the AI Office. EUSAiR aims to support the implementation of AI regulatory sandboxes by developing common frameworks, enhancing technical and legal capacities, and promoting collaboration among Member States. It aims to provide broad access to sandboxes for AI innovators, especially SMEs and startups, by lowering compliance costs and easing entry barriers to the market.

Testing and Experimentation Facilities (TEFs)

The EU has established specialised Testing and Experimentation Facilities (TEFs) that offer large-scale reference sites where technology providers across Europe can test state-of-the-art AI solutions in real-world environments. These projects will receive over €220 million in combined funding from the European Commission and Member States for a five-year period. These facilities support supervised testing and experimentation in cooperation with national authorities and can contribute to the implementation of regulatory sandboxes. Four sector-specific TEFs have been established:

  • Agri-Food: project ‘agrifoodTEF’
  • Healthcare: project ‘TEF-Health’
  • Manufacturing: project ‘AI-MATTERS’
  • Smart Cities & Communities: project ‘Citcom.AI’

European Digital Innovation Hubs (EDIHs)

European Digital Innovation Hubs (EDIHs) are regional one-stop shops that help companies and public sector organisations respond to digital challenges and improve their competitiveness. They offer access to technical expertise and testing (as well as a possibility to ‘test before invest’), innovation services (such as financial advice), and skills development. There are over 150 hubs operating across the EU.

The 2025 AI Continent Action Plan highlights the role of the EDIH network in facilitating companies’ access to regulatory sandboxes. It also mentions that EDIHs will expand their offering of practical AI training courses tailored to various technical and non-technical backgrounds. 

National implementation approaches

The AI Act gives Member States considerable flexibility in designing their regulatory sandboxes. Some Member States are creating centralised approaches with dedicated AI agencies, while others are adopting decentralised models that leverage existing regulatory bodies. Even where a Member State has yet to announce sandbox plans, responsibility rests with its national competent authority under the AI Act. Overview of all national implementation plans, including competent authorities, can be found here.

This resource tracks each Member State’s approach to implementing AI regulatory sandboxes, examining key aspects including:

  • Overview: The current status and general approach to AI regulatory sandboxes.
  • Key actors: Organisations responsible for sandbox design, implementation, and oversight.
  • Legal framework: Laws, regulations, and policies establishing and governing the sandbox.
  • Operational structure: How the sandbox functions, including the admission process, testing process, and the assistance provided.

The resource builds upon Nathan Genicot’s report ‘From Blueprint to Reality: Implementing AI Regulatory Sandboxes under the AI Act’ (2024).

This post was published on 2 May, 2025