惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
GbyAI
GbyAI
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
博客园_首页
D
Docker
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
K
Kaspersky official blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
V
V2EX
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
美团技术团队
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
T
Tor Project blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
The Cloudflare Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
AI
AI
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
I
InfoQ
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
S
Schneier on Security
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
S
Securelist
IT之家
IT之家
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog

EU Artificial Intelligence Act

The Advisory Forum: What Is It And How Does It Work? The EU AI Act’s Transparency Rules: A Practical Guide to Article 50 The EU AI Act’s Transparency Rules: A Practical Guide to Article 50 Enforcement of Chapter V under the EU AI Act Enforcement of Chapter V under the EU AI Act What the EU AI Act Means for Staffing Businesses What the EU AI Act Means for Staffing Businesses Modifying AI Under the EU AI Act: Lessons from Practice on Classification and Compliance Modifying AI Under the EU AI Act: Lessons from Practice on Classification and Compliance Whistleblowing and the EU AI Act Whistleblowing and the EU AI Act Overview of Guidelines for GPAI Models Overview of Guidelines for GPAI Models Overview of the Code of Practice Overview of the Code of Practice Why Join the EU AI Scientific Panel? AI Literacy Programs in Europe – Supporting Article 4 of the EU AI Act AI Literacy Programs in Europe – Supporting Article 4 of the EU AI Act AI Regulatory Sandbox Approaches: EU Member State Overview AI Regulatory Sandbox Approaches: EU Member State Overview Providers of General-Purpose AI Models — What We Know About Who Will Qualify Providers of General-Purpose AI Models — What We Know About Who Will Qualify Small Businesses’ Guide to the AI Act Small Businesses’ Guide to the AI Act Job Opportunities at the European AI Office for Legal and Policy Backgrounds Job Opportunities at the European AI Office for Legal and Policy Backgrounds The AI Office is hiring a Lead Scientific Advisor for AI The AI Office is hiring a Lead Scientific Advisor for AI Overview of all AI Act National Implementation Plans Overview of all AI Act National Implementation Plans The AI Act: Responsibilities of the European Commission (AI Office) The AI Act: Responsibilities of the European Commission (AI Office) The AI Act: Responsibilities of the EU Member States The AI Act: Responsibilities of the EU Member States An Introduction to the Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI An Introduction to the Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI Why work at the EU AI Office? Why work at the EU AI Office? Robust governance for the AI Act: Insights and highlights from Novelli et al. (2024) Robust governance for the AI Act: Insights and highlights from Novelli et al. (2024) The AI Office is hiring The AI Office is hiring The AI Office: What is it, and how does it work? The AI Office: What is it, and how does it work? AI Act Implementation: Timelines & Next steps AI Act Implementation: Timelines & Next steps High-level summary of the AI Act High-level summary of the AI Act Standard Setting | EU Artificial Intelligence Act Standard Setting | EU Artificial Intelligence Act
Why Join the EU AI Scientific Panel?
Adam Radivoj · 2025-06-17 · via EU Artificial Intelligence Act

The European Commission has published a call for applications for a scientific panel of independent experts. The panel focuses on general-purpose AI (GPAI) models and systems. Its tasks include advising the EU AI Office and national authorities on systemic risks, model classification, evaluation methodologies, and cross-border market surveillance. Further, the panel is empowered to alert the AI Office of emerging risks.

Applications are open until 14th of September.

Summary

  • The scientific panel plays an important role in enforcement of the EU AI Act related to general-purpose AI. It does so amongst other by providing advice, up-to-date insight into technical developments, and adopting qualified alerts for emerging systemic risks.
  • The panel will consist of up to 60 independent experts that are geographically representative of the Member States and gender balanced. Up to 20% of the experts may be from third countries.
  • The selection criteria include multidisciplinary expertise, independence, impartiality and objectivity, and professional capability.
  • The required expertise areas comprise model evaluation, risk assessment, technical mitigations, misuse and systemic risks, cyber offence risks, cybersecurity, emergent risks and compute measurement.
  • There are three eligibility requirements: PhD in a relevant field OR equivalent experience; proven professional experience and scientific impact in AI/GPAI research or AI impact studies; and demonstrated independence from AI system or GPAI model providers.
  • Experts will be remunerated for carrying out certain tasks and travel expenses may be covered.

Why join the Scientific Panel of Independent Experts?

The scientific panel plays an important role  in the enforcement of the EU AI Act, the most comprehensive AI governance framework globally.

The independent experts on the panel gain professional recognition and visibility as trusted advisors while influencing the development, deployment, and impact of advanced GPAI in Europe. Further, the panel is an opportunity to collaborate with and work alongside top experts from across the EU and beyond in a high-level, multidisciplinary setting. Perhaps most importantly, experts will engage in mission-driven, public-interest work that promotes the responsible and safe development and deployment of AI technologies in Europe.

Scientific panel tasks, powers and competences in more detail

Overview 

The Scientific Panel, established by the EU AI Act (Article 68 point 1), provides technical advice to the AI Office and national authorities on enforcing AI Act requirements for general-purpose AI models and systems. Key tasks include:

  • Developing assessment tools and methodologies,
  • Advising on model classification including systemic risk determination,
  • Creating tools and templates, and
  • Supporting market surveillance activities.

The panel can request information from AI model providers through the Commission while protecting trade secrets, and Commission experts may conduct model evaluations for the AI Office.

Qualified Alerts 

The panel can issue alerts (Article 90) that may require providers to conduct safety assessments and implement protective measures when models create EU-level risks, affect multiple member states, or meet systemic risk criteria (which are detailed in Article 51: requiring 10^25+ FLOPS to train, demonstrating high-impact capabilities, or equivalent capabilities based on parameters, dataset size, market reach of 10,000+ EU business users, etc.).

Alerts require simple majority approval and must include provider contact information, justification, and relevant facts. The AI Office has two weeks to process alerts and may designate models as systemically risky, subjecting providers to additional requirements (Article 55), including risk assessments, incident reporting, and cybersecurity obligations.

Structure and Composition 

The panel will comprise of up to 60 independent experts serving two-year renewable terms. Gender balance and geographical representation is ensured by having at least one expert per EU Member State and EFTA/EEA country (maximum three per country). At a minimum, 80% of the experts will be from EU/EFTA/EEA nations.

The structure includes a Secretariat for administrative support, a Chair and Vice-Chair for the full term, and compensated rapporteurs and contributors for specific tasks. The panel operates transparently by publicly sharing expert information, opinions, recommendations, and stakeholder hearing records while protecting confidential business information.

Selection Criteria

According to the AI Act experts must demonstrate:

  • Multidisciplinary expertise – Up-to-date scientific, technical, or socio-technical knowledge related to AI systems, general-purpose AI models, or AI impacts relevant to enforcing the AI Act;
  • Independence – No conflicts of interest with AI systems or general-purpose AI model providers;
  • Impartiality and objectivity – Ability to work without bias as required by the AI Act;
  • Professional capability – Ability to carry out work diligently, accurately, and objectively.

Free, independent, and here to stay.

Our goal is to build the most useful, authoritative, and comprehensive guide to the AI Act anywhere on the internet. We’ll never put this behind a paywall or use it to sell you a service. We do this because we think good AI governance matters, and that means making authoritative guidance genuinely accessible.

If you want to help us out, please consider contributing a guest post to help others understand and navigate the Act, or send your ideas and feedback for the website to me (Taylor, Design & Web Manager) at: websites@futureoflife.org. To stay up-to-date, subscribe to our bi-weekly AI Act newsletter, the world’s most trusted regular AI Act publication with over 50,000+ subscribers. We’ve published over 100 updates since 2022.

This website is built and maintained by the Future of Life Institute — the world’s oldest and largest nonprofit working for the responsible development of AI.

Required Expertise Areas

According to the call for applications, candidates must have substantiated expertise in at least one area:

  • Model evaluation – Benchmarking, red teaming, human impact studies, deployment evaluations, fundamental rights assessments, economic impact analysis, AI capability forecasting;
  • Risk assessment – Risk identification, analysis, modelling, evaluation, safety cases, risk taxonomies for AI and GPAI models;
  • Technical mitigations – Safety fine-tuning, filters, guardrails, watermarking, data processing, risk management policies, scaling policies, incident response;
  • Misuse and systemic risks – CBRN risks, population manipulation, loss of control, discrimination, public health/safety risks, fundamental rights risks;
  • Cyber offence risks – Vulnerability exploitation, zero-day generation, social engineering, autonomous cyber operations, infrastructure targeting;
  • Cybersecurity – Preventing model weight theft, unauthorised releases, safety measure circumvention;
  • Emergent risks – Misalignment, deceptive behaviours, loss of control, emergent capabilities like self-replication;
  • Compute measurement – Methodologies for measuring training compute, reporting frameworks, verification protocols.

Eligibility Requirements

  • PhD in relevant field OR equivalent experience;
  • Proven professional experience and scientific impact in AI/GPAI research or AI impact studies;
  • Demonstrated independence from AI system or GPAI model providers.

Remuneration

Experts will be remunerated if they are appointed rapporteur or contributor for carrying out tasks that have been requested by the AI Office. The Commission may reimburse experts’ travel expenses and, if needed, subsistence costs related to panel duties, within available budget limits.

This post was published on 16 Jun, 2025