惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
W
WeLiveSecurity
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
T
Tor Project blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
IT之家
IT之家
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
J
Java Code Geeks
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
博客园 - 【当耐特】
博客园_首页
H
Hacker News: Front Page
T
Threatpost
Jina AI
Jina AI
博客园 - Franky
月光博客
月光博客
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
The Cloudflare Blog
H
Heimdal Security Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
雷峰网
雷峰网
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
S
Secure Thoughts
T
Tenable Blog
I
Intezer
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻

FourWeekMBA

Musk vs Altman: The $90B Fight That Will Define AI’s Future Why DeepMind’s $1.1B Bet Signals the End of Human-Trained AI The AI Orchestrator's Leverage Points AI & The Harness Theory Why AI Companies Are Selling Fiction as Partnership Strategy Google’s $40B Anthropic Bet Reveals AI Infrastructure Wars Anthropic’s Agent Economy Signals End of Human-Mediated Commerce Claude OS: The AI Strategy Skill That Turns Claude Into Your Analyst Agent Harness OS: Build AI-Augmented Strategic Operations 🔥 AI & The Harness Theory 🔥 The Harnessing Players Map of AI 🔥 The Business Engineer’s Claude Code OS 🔥 Skills as the Architecture of the Personal OS Google's $40B Anthropic Bet Exposes Big Tech's AI Desperation Google's $40B Anthropic Bet Signals Platform Wars 2.0 20 Mental Models For AI Business Google's TPU Gambit: Why Hardware Will Crown the AI King LinkedIn Business Model: How LinkedIn Makes Money (2026) Netflix Organizational Structure: The Culture of Freedom (2026) Amazon Pricing Strategy: How Amazon Uses Price to Win Amazon Supply Chain: The Logistics Empire (2026) Apple Supply Chain: How Apple Built the World’s Best Supply Chain Tesla Supply Chain: Vertical Integration Strategy (2026) Anthropic Business Model: How Anthropic Makes Money (2026) OpenAI Business Model: How OpenAI Makes Money (2026) Meta (Facebook) Organizational Structure 2026 Google's Agentic TPUs Signal the Death of Traditional SaaS Google's $40B Anthropic Bet Signals The End of AI Independence The OpenAI–Anthropic Convergent Bets Google’s $40B Anthropic Bet Signals the End of Open AI Innovation The Business Engineer's Claude Code OS Pentagon’s $54B Drone Budget Reveals the New Defense Economy Google's $40B Anthropic Bet Signals the End of Open AI Markets Apple’s CEO Transition Reveals the Platform Monopoly Trap Why Worldcoin’s Fake Partnership Signals AI’s Trust Crisis Google's TPU Play Signals the End of GPU Monopoly Artisan’s “Stop Hiring Humans” Stunt Reveals AI’s Marketing Problem GaaS vs SaaS: Why AI Agents Kill Per-Seat Pricing Defensible Moats in AI: What Actually Protects an AI Company The Software Collapse: When Code Becomes a Liability Apple's Subscription Empire Signals The End of Product Innovation Google’s TPU Gambit: The Hardware War for AI Agents AI & The Importance of System Thinking Why Prego’s Kitchen Surveillance Signals Audio’s Next Battleground Apple’s Subscription Pivot Reveals Platform Monopoly Endgame Tesla’s $25B Bet Signals Manufacturing’s AI Revolution Physical AI Market Map: Where Real-World AI Creates Value From SaaS to AgaaS: How AI Agents Are Killing Per-Seat Pricing Prego’s Kitchen Surveillance Reveals Big Food’s Data Desperation Tim Cook’s Subscription Trap Is Killing Apple’s Innovation DNA The Chinese AI Economy OpenAI-OpenClaw Deal & the War for Personal Agents The Shape of the Agentic Interface The RLVR-to-Agentic Use Case Map The Agentic Architecture Race The SaaS Destruction Map The State of Agentic AI The Turning Point The Post-SaaS Expansion Map Five Predictions for the Agentic Economy The Five Scaling Phases of AI The Great Interface Inversion The Agent-Native API The AI Value Chain of Work Capacity-Priority Mismatch Matrix Salesforce & The Agentic Cannibalization NVIDIA & The State of AI The System of Action The Strategic Bet Matrix AI Agents & The New Payment Infrastructure Why World Chose Tinder as Its Humanness Beachhead Uber's Assetmaxxing Era: The Robotaxi Reckoning AI Business Brief: OpenAI’s 12-Month Window and the Great Consolidation — April 20, 2026 Content Marketing Strategy vs Meta/Facebook Growth Strategy: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Netflix Business Model vs Disney Business Model: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Facebook/Meta Business Model vs Amazon Business Model: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] DTC Model vs Wholesale Model: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Marketplace Model vs Platform Model: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Value Chain Analysis vs Supply Chain: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Apple Business Model vs Samsung Business Model: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Uber Business Model vs Lyft Business Model: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Cost Leadership vs Differentiation Strategy: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Freemium vs Subscription Model: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Porter’s Five Forces vs SWOT Analysis: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Porter’s Five Forces vs PESTEL Analysis: Key Differences & When to Use Each [2026] Salesforce & The Agentic Cannibalization: Interactive Analysis Micron & The AI Memory Bottleneck: Constraint Map The AI Reasoning Growth Loop: Memory & Flywheel Framework - FourWeekMBA The Inference Economy: Interactive Framework - FourWeekMBA Amazon in the AI Era: From E-Commerce Giant to AI Infrastructure Power - FourWeekMBA Google in the AI Era: How the Business Model Is Evolving - FourWeekMBA AI Strategy Cheat Sheets: Top 10 Frameworks in One Page - FourWeekMBA AI Landscape Explorer: Every Company Analyzed - FourWeekMBA AI Strategy Learning Paths: Four Guided Journeys - FourWeekMBA Which AI Framework Do You Need? Interactive Quiz - FourWeekMBA NVIDIA’s Industrial AI Thesis: Five Structural Trends - FourWeekMBA The Business Engineer Database: 663 AI & Business Strategy Analyses - FourWeekMBA The State of Business AI — March 2026 Executive Report - FourWeekMBA The State of Agentic AI: Interactive Report - FourWeekMBA The SaaS Destruction Map: $2T Revenue Repriced - FourWeekMBA
Google Built the Foundation of Modern AI — Then Lost Everyone Who Made It - FourWeekMBA
FourWeekMBA · 2026-06-20 · via FourWeekMBA

In one week, Google lost the inventor of the Transformer to OpenAI and the creator of AlphaFold to Anthropic. But the exodus didn’t start this week. It started in 2017 — the same year the Transformer paper was published.

The Scoreboard — June 2026

7 of 8

Transformer paper authors who left Google

$2.7B

Google paid to get Shazeer back. He left again in <2 years.

1

Nobel laureate lost to Anthropic this week

6

Companies founded by ex-Google Transformer authors

The Week That Made It Undeniable

On June 18, Noam Shazeer — co-inventor of the Transformer architecture and co-lead of Google Gemini — announced he was leaving Google for OpenAI. One day later, John Jumper — Nobel laureate and creator of AlphaFold — announced he was leaving Google DeepMind for Anthropic.

Two departures in 48 hours. One to the company Google is trying to beat. One to the company Google is trying to contain. Both scientists who defined what Google was supposed to be.

The Shazeer departure carries a special sting. Google paid approximately $2.7 billion in 2024 to bring him back from Character.AI — the startup he founded after leaving Google in 2021. He was appointed co-lead of Gemini. Less than two years later, he walked out the door again — this time to the rival Google most fears.

$2.7 billion. That is the price Google paid for less than two years of Noam Shazeer’s time. It may be the most expensive failed retention in corporate history.

The Transformer Eight — Where They All Went

In 2017, eight Google researchers published “Attention Is All You Need” — the paper that introduced the Transformer architecture and made modern AI possible. Every large language model — GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama — is built on their work. Nine years later, almost none of them are still at Google.

The Transformer Eight — Status June 2026

Noam Shazeer

Google → Character.AI (founded) → Google ($2.7B return) → OpenAI (June 2026)

Ashish Vaswani

Google → Adept AI (co-founded) → Essential AI (founded, $1B valuation)

Llion Jones

Google → Sakana AI (founded, Tokyo)

Aidan Gomez

Google → Cohere (co-founded, enterprise AI)

Jakob Uszkoreit

Google → Inceptive (founded, RNA design)

Lukasz Kaiser

Google → OpenAI (researcher)

Illia Polosukhin

Google → NEAR Protocol (co-founded, blockchain)

Niki Parmar

Google → Adept AI (co-founded with Vaswani) → Status unclear

Seven of the eight authors have left. Six founded or joined competing companies. Two — Shazeer and Kaiser — went directly to OpenAI. The paper that enabled $10 trillion in market value was written entirely at Google. Almost none of the people who wrote it stayed.

Beyond the Paper — The Broader Exodus

The Transformer Eight are the most visible departures, but they are not the only ones. Google has been hemorrhaging senior AI talent for years:

John Jumper (AlphaFold, Nobel Prize) → Anthropic — June 2026

Dario Amodei (Google Brain → OpenAI VP Research) → Founded Anthropic

11 executives left Google for Microsoft in 2025 alone

Apple’s Siri lead left for Google DeepMind in Jan 2026 — Google can still attract, but can’t retain its own

The pattern is consistent: Google hires brilliant researchers, gives them resources to do foundational work, publishes the results — and then watches as those researchers leave to commercialize the insights elsewhere. Google is not losing a talent war. Google is funding one.

Why They Leave

The departures cluster around three structural forces:

1. THE PRODUCT GAP

Google publishes research. OpenAI and Anthropic ship products. Shazeer wanted to build consumer-facing AI — Google’s ad-revenue model made that structurally difficult. He left twice over the same friction.

2. THE MISSION GAP

Jumper moved to a safety-focused lab. Dario Amodei founded one. Multiple DeepMind researchers have cited the post-merger shift away from fundamental research toward applied AI as their reason for leaving. When the mission changes, the missionaries leave.

3. THE FOUNDER GAP

Six of the Transformer Eight founded companies. They didn’t leave for better salaries — they left for ownership. The researchers who invented the most valuable architecture in computing history were employees at Google. They watched others build empires on their work. Then they decided to build their own.

The Structural Read

Google’s problem is not compensation. Google can match any offer. The problem is structural: Google is organized to protect an advertising business, not to ship AI products. Every breakthrough Google produces must pass through a filter: does this help ads, or does it threaten them?

That filter is invisible to users but perfectly visible to researchers. It is why Shazeer left the first time — Google wouldn’t let him ship a chatbot that might cannibalize Search. It is why he left the second time — even after $2.7 billion and the co-lead of Gemini, the structural constraint didn’t change.

The Core Problem

Google doesn’t have a talent problem.
Google has a product-culture problem
that manifests as a talent problem.

Anthropic ships Claude. OpenAI ships ChatGPT. Cohere ships enterprise AI. Essential AI ships agents. All founded or staffed by ex-Google researchers. Google published the Transformer paper — and then spent nine years watching everyone else build on it faster.

Harness Theory

Google Had the Harness. It Couldn’t Keep It Tightened.

A harness is not just capability — it is capability wrapped in a system that directs it toward outcomes. Google had the talent, the compute, the data, and the research. It lacked the system to direct them toward products. The researchers who built the harness at Google left to build their own — at companies where the harness connects directly to users, not to an ad server. The lesson: capability without product direction is a research grant, not a moat.

What It Means

Google is not dying. It still has Gemini, the largest compute infrastructure in the world, and billions in AI revenue. But the talent exodus reveals something the stock price doesn’t: Google has become the training ground for the AI industry, not its destination.

The researchers come for the resources, do their best work, publish it — and then leave to build companies that compete with Google using the ideas Google paid them to develop. The Transformer was invented at Google. AlphaFold was invented at Google. The founders of Anthropic, Cohere, Essential AI, Sakana AI, and Inceptive all trained at Google. And now OpenAI’s newest hire is the man Google spent $2.7 billion to bring back.

Google built the foundation of modern AI. Then it lost everyone who made it. That is not a talent-market story. That is a strategy story — and it is the most expensive one in tech history.

Business Engineer Deep Dive

The AI Supercycle — Where Talent Flows, Value Follows

The Transformer Eight created six companies across five layers of the AI stack. The Map of AI shows why talent migration is the leading indicator of where value concentrates — and which layers are about to get disrupted.

Read the AI Supercycle →

Sources: Attention Is All You Need (2017), Calcalist, CB Insights, Axios — June 19, 2026