Spring brings on the art fever in South Asia, with the Kochi-Muziris Biennale in Kochi, the India Art Fair in New Delhi, Colomboscope in Colombo, Chobi Mela in Dhaka, and several other art festivals happening all over. With the India Art Fair (February 5-February 8) happening somewhere in the background, I sat down with Mumbai-based artist Shilpa Gupta in a quiet corner of Bikaner House, New Delhi, for a conversation about her interdisciplinary practice.
Gupta is one of the most well-known young artists in India today, with her work having been displayed in leading institutions and museums such as the Tate Modern, Museum of Modern Art, Centre Pompidou, Guggenheim Museum, Ishara Art Foundation, Kiran Nadar Museum, and Devi Art Foundation. At a ceremony held in September 2025, she received the Possehl Prize for International Art 2025. The prize includes €25,000 as prize money and a solo exhibition in Lübeck, Germany.
This exhibition, “we last met in the mirror”, opened at Kunsthalle St. Annen in Lübeck on the day of the award ceremony and will be on display until April 5. The Possehl website says, “For more than two decades [Gupta] has explored the effects on societies of boundaries and demarcation lines drawn by state actors, and includes social, geographic and psychological borders in addition to questions of national identity. Language and the power it encapsulates are an important focus of her artistic work.”
This is evident in the anthology she co-edited with Salil Tripathi, For, In Your Tongue, I Cannot Fit: Encounters with Prison. Pegged on Gupta’s eponymous art installation, which opened at the Edinburgh Art Festival in 2018 and travelled to Kochi, Venice, Antwerp, London, and Dallas, the book “serves as a document and a testament, a creative intervention on a continuum of silencing,” as Annie Zaidi said in her review for Frontline.

Shilpa Gupta: "Since the very beginning, my practice has engaged with perception, deception, and misinformation." | Photo Credit: By special arrangement
Another exhibition by Gupta, “Listening Air”, is happening simultaneously with the Kochi-Muziris Biennale until March 31 at the Ginger House Museum Hotel in Kochi. With a practice deeply rooted in questions of border-making, manipulation of language, structures of power and the politics of representation, Gupta does not seek voracious consumption by viewers. What she wants instead is to stoke slow contemplation and deep reflection. Inevitably, then, concerns about how art is circulated and remembered came up in our conversation. Are the concentrated moments of visibility afforded by art events the only possible exposure that art and artists can have in present times? Or is there a scope for more sustained engagement? Edited excerpts from her responses:
How has Mumbai influenced your artistic practice?
I grew up in quiet, mixed suburbs with several temples, churches, and mosques. Starting art school in the ominous years of 1992-1993 left a deep impact. On the one hand was the unbelievable frenzy following liberalisation and on the other hand was the city torn apart by sectarian riots.
On my daily commute by train to the city centre, I would sit staring at the gigantic billboards telling us how to live, that seemed to have sprung up almost overnight. I often work with text in my works—the impulse emerged from these encounters with advertisements and the coded, absurd and instructional messages they carry.
The train appeared in Untitled (1996), where I suspended a long row of train handles from the ceiling of a room. The work is about the suspended body performing the everyday, negotiating movement and safety.
I took my work Blame (2002) to the local train again in the form of an interactive performance. Blame consisted of bottles of simulated blood. Their label said, “I blame you for what you cannot control. Your religion. Your nationality.”
In Notice Board—A Letter to the Housing Society (2009), a text-based work, I wrote a complaint about blood leaking into my walls, both from the flat upstairs and the flat below. The address carried a street with two names, in a city that continues to move between two names—Bombay and Mumbai.
The plurality of my neighbourhood inspired the outdoor light installation, I live under your sky too / Hum bhi aapke aasman ke niche rehte hai (2004), with interwoven text in English, Hindi and Urdu.
Your installations take a minimalist approach while exploring contested ideas of nation-making and borders. Can you comment?
These works are about the slow persistence of the individual vis-à-vis the larger structures that surround us—structures hinged to power, playing games and manipulating in order to remain in power.
The India-Bangladesh border series, Drawing in the Dark, emerges from the experience of everyday life that must go on, often in the dark, in the shadow of a manmade fence across a border that divides. But borders also join. The same can be said of We Change Each Other, where interwoven texts in English, Hindi, and Urdu float against the horizon of a city that has, must, and continues to move together. Within that movement, our lives endure.
In “Listening Air”, songs from different protest sites play in a room. Do you see protest as a universal language despite its local specificities?
In “Listening Air”, songs from different eras and geographies circulate in the gallery space. They move across different languages, much like the light installation, We Change Each Other. Here, not knowing one language becomes a part of knowing—an acknowledgement of the presence of the other. The work is about singing together and seeking strength in forms of art at a time when governments are losing the patience to listen to those who challenge them.

From “Listening Air” by Shilpa Gupta. | Photo Credit: By special arrangement
Language, spoken, written, or sung, appears throughout your oeuvre as a tool of resistance. What power does words hold when they are censored, banned, and tweaked?
In 100 Hand-drawn Maps of My Country, none of the maps matches. For Someone Else, 100 writers, some very well-known today, took on fake names to publish books. For Altered Inheritances, 100 people changed their surnames. These works led to the sound installation, For, In Your Tongue, I Cannot Fit, based on 100 poets who have been incarcerated. All these works acknowledge the individual who finds ways to negotiate societal or state expectations and impositions, even when language itself is increasingly under watch. The attempt to contain language reveals the fragility of power, its eagerness to manipulate who gets to speak and how.

Blame by Shilpa Gupta. | Photo Credit: By special arrangement
For, In Your Tongue, I Cannot Fit has had multiple iterations in the form of a sound installation, book and drawings, which makes it accessible to a variety of audiences. Was it a conscious decision to present the work in diverse forms?
I often move across mediums. Blame started as a poster to later become a bottle, a sticker, even an interactive performance. While making the sound installation, For, In Your Tongue, I Cannot Fit, I found it impossible to let go of the many stories of incarcerated poets. That is how the drawings emerged. The book had existed as a drafted proposal even before showing the sound installation happened. It took several years to fundraise, find a publisher, and make it all come together! The book was a way to honour the poets—to translate and share their stories and words. Even when regimes held their bodies, their words continued to flow.

Truth by Shilpa Gupta. | Photo Credit: By special arrangement
Many of your works invite the participation of viewers. Why?
It is all about how meaning is made and held together.
The ongoing exhibition, "we last met in the mirror", is your first show in Germany. How does it bring together your three-decade-long practice?
The title, “we last met in the mirror", is about the self, in reflection, confronting its own limits. Much of our actions emerge from the unconscious. Since the very beginnings, my practice has engaged with perception, deception, and misinformation—how knowing is partial and contingent, and how meaning is not given but negotiated. “we last met in the mirror"is about the friction between knowledge and power, between language and image, between truth and appearance and agency.
Dilpreet Bhullar is a writer-editor based in New Delhi.
Also Read | Creating art is like the everyday act of cooking: Sohrab Hura
Also Read | We don’t need more symbols






















