惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
A
About on SuperTechFans
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
L
LangChain Blog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
量子位
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
H
Help Net Security
D
Docker
D
DataBreaches.Net
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
B
Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
The Cloudflare Blog
F
Full Disclosure
GbyAI
GbyAI
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Y
Y Combinator Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
博客园 - Franky
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
博客园 - 叶小钗
小众软件
小众软件
V
Visual Studio Blog
月光博客
月光博客
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
J
Java Code Geeks
雷峰网
雷峰网
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
C
Cisco Blogs
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
美团技术团队
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
G
Google Developers Blog
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
博客园_首页
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost

Privacy International News Feed

Humanless Resources? Uncovering AI recruitment software When algorithms go to war PI’s submission to the UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries Collateral Damage: Claude Mythos and the Privacy Risks of AI Key highlights of our 2026 results by season World Food Programme expand Palantir partnership Time to address the human rights implications of AI in the military domain Bad Vibes: AI coding tools and privacy issues How New EU Access to Documents Rules Can Reduce Transparency and Shield Big Tech Privacy International’s submission to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on the protection of human rights defenders in the digital age Collateral Damage: Grok AI and the Human Cost of Generative AI From Big Oil to Big Algorithm: Public Money in Private Models Dual-use tech: the BAE Systems example Dual-use tech: the Lockheed Martin example Voter Disenfranchisement: A Privacy Issue What is digital fingerprinting: Is my device ever truly anonymous? Moving Goalposts: Football, Facial Recognition and the Expansion of Surveillance Dangerous data Challenging the militarisation of tech: a visual explainer Are IP addresses personal data? PI seeks to inform inquiry of UK Joint Committee on Human Rights on human rights and AI Transparency and explainability for algorithmic decisions at work Our key achievements from 2025 Joint Statement on New Finnish Social Welfare Laws’ Human Rights Implications Privacy International’s remarks at the side event of the 61st Session of the UN Human Rights Council on the Human Rights Impacts of Using Artificial Intelligence in Countering Terrorism What does it mean when Big Tech goes to war? Privacy International & Women on Web - Securing Reproductive Justice: A Guide to Digital Privacy for Sexual and Reproductive Justice Activists
The ILO Convention on decent work in the platform economy
staff · 2026-03-31 · via Privacy International News Feed

Background and summary

On 3 July 2025, the General Conference of the International Labour Organization (ILO) agreed a resolution committing the ILO to adopt a Convention supplemented by a Recommendation concerning decent work in the platform economy following a second discussion on this issue in 2026.

PI welcomes the ILO’s decision as a step in the right direction to protect platform workers who have been at the forefront of new forms of data exploitation in the workplace. The platform economy has created an environment of unprecedented surveillance and monitoring for workers that greatly threatens privacy and other fundamental rights.

While we welcome the ILO’s efforts to try to address the risks to faced by workers in the platform economy, our overall assessment of the texts continues to be that the new drafts of both the Convention and the Recommendation do not sufficiently address the risks posed by the use of automated systems and their impact on workers’ rights.

In particular, PI is encouraging the ILO and its Members to implement measures that will effectively protect the privacy, autonomy and dignity of workers by:

  • Ensuring the Convention covers all platform workers by removing provisions which provide for different protections based on classification of employment relationship. This should ensure that the rights and labour conditions of all workers in the platform economy are protected by default from the onset;
  • Requiring platforms to maintain a public register of automated systems deployed and provide workers and their representatives with comprehensive information in accessible language about their purpose, design and functioning. Such information should be provided to workers before they are subject to an automated system, and following any update of the systems concerned. Platforms should also provide access to source code and to technical support to help workers understand their algorithms;
  • Requiring platforms to provide workers, by default and from the onset, with written explanations, for automated decisions that include personalised information in accessible language, including the key parameters considered and their values. Workers should also have access to review by a human being for any decision that impacts their working conditions or access to work;
  • Ensuring the existence of safeguards to protect both workers’ privacy and personal data. Workers rights should be protected in accordance with best practice in international standards and norms;
  • Ensuring access to dispute resolution and remedies is available within a reasonable time and without undue delay.

We believe that these changes are required to ensure this new instrument will prevent automated systems from negatively impacting platform workers and help stop a decline in working conditions due to the introduction of automated systems. Digital labour platforms and member states must be legally obliged to adopt and implement clear and effective measures that protect privacy, autonomy and dignity of all workers.

PI’s engagement in the process so far

Our work on the drafting of the Convention and the Recommendation is built on a response to the ILO questionnaire on realizing decent work in the platform economy in 2024, and a joint declaration made by PI and over 30 organisations from across the world ahead of the International Labour Conference (ILC25) in June 2025.

In August 2025, the ILO published an updated draft of the Convention and Recommendation (known as the Brown report). PI examined and provided its analysis of the Brown Report, alongside a joint analysis with CSOs working at the intersection of human rights and tech, groups dedicated to advocating for labour rights, and workers’ representatives from across the world. Together, we identified a shared set of common issues of concern with the Brown Report, as the draft texts did not sufficiently address certain challenges related to the use of automated system, and their impact on workers’ rights.

Following feedback from Member States, representative organizations of employers and workers, the ILO published in March 2026 a revised version of the Convention and the Recommendation (known as the Blue report), which will serve as the basis for a discussion at the International Labour Conference (ILC26) in June 2026.

Our assessment of the Blue Report finds that some protections provided for in the Brown report have been removed and a number of prior concerns we highlighted have not been addressed. There is also an inclusion of new and/or amended provisions which raise additional concerns.

Together with over 30 organisations from around the world, we prepared a joint analysis of the Blue Report as well as a joint statement addressing the provisions of the current draft text that need to be strengthened in the final weeks of negotiations, to ensure that the text put forward for voting will provide robust protections for all platform workers, and outline clear obligations for Member States and digital platforms, including:

  • clear criteria and mechanisms to determine the existence of an employment relationship, considering the realities of algorithmic management, whilst not limiting key protections only to workers formally recognized as being in an employment relationship but on the substance of the relationship;
  • guaranteeing fair and living wages (including wait times, which is still not covered in the draft text) regardless of employment classification; 
  • ensuring eligibility for health and safety standards regardless of employment classification;
  • providing access to social protection regardless of employment classification; and
  • imposing further obligations on platforms to maintain a public register of automated systems deployed that includes information on the system's purpose, design and functioning (e.g., how meaningful human oversight is managed), and to provide workers with personalised written explanations for decisions that affect them. This should be accompanied by means for workers to contest and reverse automated decisions.

We will be sharing our recommendations with member states and other interested parties as part of the formal drafting process of the Convention and the Recommendation over the coming months, and look forward to following the process up until and during the ILC26 in June 2026.

To keep up to date with our work on this issue, please sign up to our mailing list.