The idea appears, at first glance, mildly eccentric. To write one’s own obituary seems like an exercise reserved for philosophers, the overly reflective, or those with an unusual comfort with mortality. Yet, on closer examination, it reveals itself as something far more practical and relevant: a disciplined act of self-assessment.
The thought came to me through a casual remark from a friend. Why allow others to summarise a life that only one person has fully experienced? Why not attempt the summary oneself, while there is still time to revise it?
What began as a light-hearted suggestion soon acquired a certain seriousness. I opened a blank document and started, predictably, with factual details: name, education, profession, family. The result resembled a well-structured resume. It was accurate, but it lacked vitality.
This initial attempt exposed an important limitation. A life, however well-lived, resists reduction into neat categories. It is not merely a sequence of milestones, but a collection of choices, hesitations, contradictions, and evolving priorities.
At this point, the exercise began to shift. Instead of listing events, I attempted to capture tendencies. Instead of achievements, I examined patterns. The tone moved away from documentation towards interpretation.
This shift highlights an interesting overlap between two forms of writing. A memoir seeks to explore and interpret experience, often with the luxury of space and narrative freedom. An obituary, by contrast, demands brevity and selection. It must identify what is essential and leave out the rest. Writing one’s own obituary brings these two forms into conversation. It compels reflection, but within strict limits.
The central challenge, then, lies in selection. What deserves inclusion when space is finite?
Achievements present themselves readily. They are measurable, verifiable, and socially recognisable. However, they do not, by themselves, constitute a life. Equally significant are the less visible elements: the opportunities declined, the risks avoided, the conversations postponed, and the relationships insufficiently nurtured.
This raises a more uncomfortable question. To what extent should an individual acknowledge personal shortcomings in such a document? Excessive restraint produces a bland and impersonal account. Excessive candour risks turning the exercise into self-indulgence. The answer perhaps lies in balance. An effective self-written obituary would aim to be honest.
Interestingly, the process also reveals the role of memory and perception. No individual is a completely objective narrator of his or her own life. Memory is selective. Ego shapes emphasis. Regret edits or softens certain episodes. What emerges, therefore, is not a definitive account, but an interpretation informed by present awareness.
In the course of this exercise, it becomes evident that what is omitted is often as revealing as what is included. The silences in such a document may point to unresolved areas: expressions of affection left incomplete, apologies deferred, or ambitions quietly set aside.
There is, however, a constructive dimension to this reflection. Writing one’s own obituary is not merely retrospective. It has a prospective value. By identifying what appears significant in summary, it encourages a reassessment of current priorities.
If kindness finds only a marginal place in the narrative, it invites greater attention in the present. If relationships appear underdeveloped in retrospect, it suggests the need for renewed engagement. If caution dominates the account, it raises questions about missed opportunities for courage.
In this sense, the exercise functions less as a conclusion and more as an interim review. It is not about preparing for the end of life, but about refining its ongoing direction.
A subtle insight from this process is the recognition that a life cannot be meaningfully summarised without some degree of interpretation. Facts alone are insufficient. It is the pattern of decisions, responses, and values that provides coherence. Equally significant is the realisation that such a document remains inherently provisional. As long as life continues, the narrative evolves. New experiences alter perspective. Priorities shift. Relationships deepen or change.
The ‘final draft’, therefore, is never truly final. This understanding may be the most valuable outcome of the exercise. It reinforces the idea that a life is not a completed manuscript awaiting evaluation, but an ongoing work subject to revision.
The page remains open.
krs1957@hotmail.com