惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
G
Google Developers Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
U
Unit 42
A
About on SuperTechFans
Vercel News
Vercel News
B
Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
腾讯CDC
D
Docker
V
Visual Studio Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
The Cloudflare Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
B
Blog RSS Feed
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
月光博客
月光博客
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏

The Hindu: Latest News today from India and the World, Breaking news, Top Headlines and Trending News Videos.

U.K. pauses its plan to cede Chagos Islands after U.S. opposition Driver jailed for 7 days for driving sleeper bus in drunken condition Kim Jong Un supports China’s “multipolar world” vision during talks with Wang Yi Uttar Pradesh boat tragedy: Punjab town mourns deaths Relief for Bengaluru commuters as Silk Board flyover set to open fully, but inspection by BTP reveals likely bottleneck Repolling underway at booth of Karimganj North Assembly seat in Assam PM Modi interacts with Rahul Gandhi as leaders gather to pay tribute to Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Anil Kapoor’s ‘24’ set to release on OTT Vance, Iranian delegation arrives in Islamabad for U.S. talks amid ceasefire hopes Fire at Hyderabad’s Chintal Basti apartment, 17 residents evacuated safely Centre nudges States to view farm solarisation as a route to wiping off ₹2.4 lakh crore subsidy bill Why voter turnout hit record highs in Assam, Kerala & Puducherry Strait of Hormuz to be open “fairly soon”, says Trump ‘Jana Nayagan’ leak tests new legal penalties, torrent downloads under scanner Vijay’s ‘Jana Nayagan’ controversy explained: From legal battles to piracy chaos HYDRAA brings down guest house and other structures at Ameenpur Row erupts over removal of Ambedkar statue at midnight in Secunderabad Cantonment area Nitish may resign as Bihar CM on April 13; son Nishant likely to become one of two JD(U) Dy CMs Police open fire on youth while he was trying to flee Struggling CSK look to snap their losing streak | Vidyut Sivaramakrishnan ED raids former Trinamool Minister Partha Chatterjee’s residence Karnataka’s Gruha Jyothi scheme dimmed the scope of PM’s Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana: KRESMA After Artemis II, NASA looks to SpaceX, Blue Origin for Moon landings Ayush Shetty storms into Badminton Asia Championships final Scholarships: April 11, 2026 Andhra Pradesh’s Socio-Economic Survey missing in recent Budget Session; efforts underway Inside Péro’s fun office Penciljam sessions in Bengaluru help hone artistic talent Watch: The mistake killing high-concept films | Escalation without calibration | FMM 19 Tamil Nadu Assembly election 2026: DMK demands reinstatement of N. Muruganandam as Chief Secretary
NCERT book row: Supreme Court modifies earlier order conc...
2026-05-22 · via The Hindu: Latest News today from India and the World, Breaking news, Top Headlines and Trending News Videos.
Supreme Court of India. File

Supreme Court of India. File | Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Supreme Court on Friday (May 22, 2026) recalled its “harsh” observations made on its March 11 order that had directed the Centre, States and others to disassociate from three academics, following a row over an NCERT book chapter containing "offending" contents on corruption in the judiciary.

Editorial | Selective outrage: on Supreme Court and NCERT textbook

The apex court left it open to the Centre, States, Union Territories, public universities and institutions that receive funds from the Central or State governments to take an independent decision on the issue, without being influenced by its observations made in the March 11 order.

A Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi also recalled the part of the March 11 order that had recorded that the three academics — Professor Michel Danino, Suparna Diwakar and Alok Prasanna Kumar — had "deliberately and knowingly misrepresented the facts" in order to project a negative image of the Indian judiciary to the students of Class 8.

The Bench passed the order while hearing a plea moved by the three academics who explained their stand, saying no individual had the sole say in the drafting of the content and it was a collective process.

The Court also observed that its comments were made in context of the contents and not the individuals.

On March 11, acting tough against the three experts involved in the drafting of the controversial chapter in the National Council of Educational Research and Training's (NCERT) social science book for Class 8, the Court had directed the Centre and all states to disassociate from them.

It had directed the Centre to form a committee of domain experts within a week for the purpose of finalising the curriculum of the NCERT's legal studies for not only Class 8 but higher classes as well.

The Bench was hearing a suo-motu (initiated on its own) case titled "In Re: Social Science textbook for Grade-8 (part-2) published by NCERT and ancillary issues".

The Court was informed that the chapter was drafted by the textbook development team under Mr. Danino's chairmanship and consisting of members Diwakar and Kumar.

On February 26, the apex court imposed a "blanket ban" on any further publication, reprinting or digital dissemination of the NCERT's Class-8 social science textbook that contained the "offending" contents on corruption in the judiciary, saying they have fired a gunshot and the judiciary is "bleeding".

Published - May 22, 2026 02:29 pm IST