The Bombay High Court has dismissed an interim plea by the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust seeking to restrain HDFC Bank and its executives from making alleged defamatory remarks. | Photo Credit: VIVEK BENDRE

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday dismissed an interim plea filed by the medical trust that runs Lilavati Hospital here, seeking to restrain the HDFC Bank, its Managing Director and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan and others from making any defamatory remarks against the trust and its members.

The Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust had filed the interim application in a defamation suit seeking Rs 1,000 crore damages from the bank, alleging that it and its senior executives had allegedly released statements to the media and also on its social media platforms that were defamatory and harmed the reputation of the trust.

A bench of Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, while dismissing the application, however, noted that the statements were not defamatory and were in fact factually accurate.

Court says HDFC statements were factually accurate

The court also imposed a cost of Rs 5 lakh on the trust, which would have to be paid to the HDFC Bank, while noting that the application was just another plea in the long chain of proceedings initiated by the trust to derail the recovery proceedings.

The bench added that the statements made by HDFC Bank that the trust and its trustee Prashant Mehta owe the bank money was factually correct and hence fall within the realm of truthful speech.

The statements were necessitated only because of the sustained media campaign of articles against HDFC and its senior executives, the HC said.

The Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Trust, which runs the Lilavati Hospital located in Bandra area of the city, had filed the suit against HDFC Bank Limited and its executives, alleging that it had made certain defamatory content on its social media platforms against the trust and its members.

Trust had sought Rs 1,000 crore damages

The plea sought the HC to restrain the defendants from making such remarks in future that would harm the trust’s reputation, and also sought damages of Rs 1,000 crore.

HDFC Bank opposed the plea, stating that the trust and its trustees had borrowed monies from the bank and had defaulted in the repayment.

The high court in its judgment noted that the statements made by HDFC that the trustees owe substantial amounts to the bank which were never repaid and that the bank had initiated recovery and enforcement actions were factually accurate.

Hence, the same cannot be called as defamatory, the high court said.

Justice Sundaresan in fact termed as “vexatious” the allegations levelled by the trustees against the bank and its officials that they were responsible for the death of the trust’s founder Kishor Mehta.

Published on June 9, 2026