惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园 - 叶小钗
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
罗磊的独立博客
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
美团技术团队
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
腾讯CDC
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
F
Fortinet All Blogs
G
Google Developers Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
小众软件
小众软件
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
博客园_首页
B
Blog RSS Feed
D
Docker
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
爱范儿
爱范儿
I
InfoQ

Latest Business Laws, Legal Insights, News & Updates | The HinduBusinessLine

Corporations have a fundamental duty to protect ecosystem: SC holds How to copyright colours Only strong reforms can clear massive backlog of court cases SC reasserts ‘bail is the rule’ doctrine in landmark ruling Misleading ads: How global brands are testing India’s regulatory framework How the Supreme Court verdict is set to reshape India’s mining industry Income Tax tribunal paves way for double deduction claims Where does the liability of the principal borrower begin and end? Why fixed-dose combination drugs need a tighter leash Who is a ‘workman’? SC reiterates binding nature of government tenders Corporate guarantee: A ‘yearly’ quandary A treaty to protect traditional knowledge IBBI’s proposed ‘guarantees’ under fire Guidelines diminish arbitration’s role in government procurement disputes Tooth-and-nail fight over trademark colours RBI expands overseas portfolio investment options Balancing business revival and creditor interests under IBC: A statistical insight Upholding tenets of fairness in arbitration ‘Conscious acceptance’ necessary for arbitration agreements AI under new management: EU sets global standard with Artificial Intelligence Act DMRC vs DAMEPL: A legal rollercoaster culminates as SC presents ‘cure’ Indian innovators rally behind Digital Competition Bill New CCI regulations: Tightening the reins on confidential information Amending nuclear law to spur ‘pink’ hydrogen generation Level up or Log out: India’s gaming industry at a crossroads Blurred boundaries: Taxing escrowed funds in M&A deals No consideration, no tax When insolvency meets money laundering Strengthening whistleblowers’ hands
Ramakrishna Forgings wins at SC, set to bag ACIL
By M Ramesh · 2023-12-06 · via Latest Business Laws, Legal Insights, News & Updates | The HinduBusinessLine
A view of Supreme Court of India (file photo)

A view of Supreme Court of India (file photo) | Photo Credit: SHIV KUMAR PUSHPAKAR

Decks have been cleared for Ramakrishna Forgings Ltd to take over the auto components manufacturer ACIL after the Supreme Court overruled the verdicts of NCLAT and NCLT last week, which were holding back the takeover.

The issue was whether or not the Tribunals could look beyond the “commercial wisdom” of the Committee of Creditors and see if the resolution plan was good enough.

The insolvency proceedings were initiated by IDBI Bank. ACIL owed creditors ₹1,830 crore, but the final resolution plan envisaged payment of ₹129.5 crore, plus the proceeds of the sale of land owned by the company at Manesar. Ramakrishna Forgings’ initial offer was ₹74 crore, but was increased after 31 rounds of negotiations. But NCLT kept the resolution plan in abeyance and asked the Official Liquidator (OL) to provide exact value of the assets.

Ramakrishna Forgings’ counsel, Shyam Divan, successfully argued that “there was no occasion for the NCLT to embark upon a totally alien procedure of getting the OL involved in such valuation.”

The SC Bench headed by judges Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Vikram Nath were “unable to uphold the decisions” of NCLT and NCLAT. They observed that, “The moot question involved is the extent of the jurisdiction and powers of the Adjudicating Authority to go on the issue of revaluation in the background of the admitted and undisputed factual position that no objection was raised by any quarter with regard to any deficiency/irregularity, either by the RP or the appellant or the CoC, in finally approving the Resolution Plan which was sent to the Adjudicating Authority-NCLT for approval.”

The SC felt that “both the NCLT and NCLAT erred to fully recognise that under the resolution plan, the corporate debtor was set to be revived and not liquidated.”

Published on December 6, 2023