惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

SecWiki News
SecWiki News
量子位
The Cloudflare Blog
美团技术团队
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
P
Proofpoint News Feed
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
T
Tor Project blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
T
Threatpost
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
S
Secure Thoughts
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
Jina AI
Jina AI
博客园 - 聂微东
A
Arctic Wolf
I
Intezer
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
爱范儿
爱范儿
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
小众软件
小众软件
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
Project Zero
Project Zero
博客园 - 叶小钗
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
雷峰网
雷峰网
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog

Latest Business Laws, Legal Insights, News & Updates | The HinduBusinessLine

Corporations have a fundamental duty to protect ecosystem: SC holds How to copyright colours SC reasserts ‘bail is the rule’ doctrine in landmark ruling Misleading ads: How global brands are testing India’s regulatory framework How the Supreme Court verdict is set to reshape India’s mining industry Income Tax tribunal paves way for double deduction claims Where does the liability of the principal borrower begin and end? Why fixed-dose combination drugs need a tighter leash Who is a ‘workman’? SC reiterates binding nature of government tenders Corporate guarantee: A ‘yearly’ quandary A treaty to protect traditional knowledge IBBI’s proposed ‘guarantees’ under fire Guidelines diminish arbitration’s role in government procurement disputes Tooth-and-nail fight over trademark colours RBI expands overseas portfolio investment options Balancing business revival and creditor interests under IBC: A statistical insight Upholding tenets of fairness in arbitration ‘Conscious acceptance’ necessary for arbitration agreements AI under new management: EU sets global standard with Artificial Intelligence Act DMRC vs DAMEPL: A legal rollercoaster culminates as SC presents ‘cure’ Indian innovators rally behind Digital Competition Bill New CCI regulations: Tightening the reins on confidential information Amending nuclear law to spur ‘pink’ hydrogen generation Level up or Log out: India’s gaming industry at a crossroads Blurred boundaries: Taxing escrowed funds in M&A deals No consideration, no tax When insolvency meets money laundering Strengthening whistleblowers’ hands Electoral bonds case: Transparency triumphs over donors’ right to privacy Arbitration trumps criminality Vedanta’s environmental violations: A wake-up call for industries Mediation, the future of insolvency resolution? Interpreting Sec 29A(c) of IBC: NCLAT shows how No liability for directors who resigned before cheque issue, rules SC How to save deals from falling apart Madras High Court backs taxpayer in GST delayed payments interest case The promise of voluntary carbon market Are compulsorily convertible debentures debt or equity? Navigating the pre-arbitration maze Making deepfakes work Dissenting creditor’s settlement issue sent to larger bench The permanence of skill in the arena of monetary play SC solves the stamp duty puzzle in arbitration Trademark issues in naming drugs Nomination is not a statutory testament, says Supreme Court in landmark verdict The EU’s AI Act and the Brussels effect Apex court rules in favour of Jindal Steel RBI rules for cybersecurity in financial institutions Non-signatories join the arbitration bandwagon Ramakrishna Forgings wins at SC, set to bag ACIL Is women’s reservation merely a paper tiger? SC gives confidence boost to creditors in landmark verdict Revolutionising real estate insolvency with enhanced protections for homebuyers Property redevelopment approvals: Lessons from Bombay HC M Sricharan RangaRajan’s ‘Treatise on Arbitration’ provides a detailed insight on arbitration CCI’s new merger norms: Hits and misses Streamlining civil litigation: Supreme Court’s comprehensive guidelines Demat mandated for private companies too
Only strong reforms can clear massive backlog of court cases
By Vasanth RajasekaranHarshvardhan Korada · 2024-09-29 · via Latest Business Laws, Legal Insights, News & Updates | The HinduBusinessLine
IT’S OFFICIAL: The government is the most frequent visitor to law courts, responsible for half the backlog

IT’S OFFICIAL: The government is the most frequent visitor to law courts, responsible for half the backlog | Photo Credit: fstop123

The Indian judiciary has long been grappling with an overwhelming number of pending cases. With over 44.5 million cases currently awaiting resolution, the pursuit of justice is frequently hindered, leaving many without a timely settlement. In this vast sea of litigation, the Indian government emerges as the most frequent visitor to the courts and other judicial fora, responsible for nearly half the backlog.

Against this backdrop, the government has recognised the need to ease the pressure on the judiciary. Among the notable measures taken towards this end is the ‘Vivad se vishwas’ scheme, which has evolved over time with multiple iterations to address various types of disputes. The scheme’s name, which in Hindi means “from dispute to trust”, reflects the intention: to foster an environment where disputes can be settled, not fought. 

The first Vivad se vishwas scheme in 2020 was aimed squarely at tax disputes. It met with striking success as more than 1.48 lakh cases were settled, enabling the recovery of 54 per cent of the nearly ₹1 lakh crore that was under litigation. The model proved that, when given the chance, litigants are eager to settle swiftly rather than navigate the cumbersome litigation process. 

The government has since rolled out Vivad se vishwas schemes for other contentious areas, too. For example, the second iteration of the scheme, designed specifically for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), in response to the economic pressures brought on by the Covid-19 pandemic, led to the settlement of over 43,000 claims and the grant of more than ₹650 crore to MSMEs. 

Another key iteration, introduced in mid-2023, was aimed at contractors who were in dispute with the government over public procurement deals. By allowing the contractors to settle for a portion of the claimed amount, the scheme has already resolved claims worth over ₹1,650 crore. Though dealing with past disputes, these measures send a powerful message to future investors and contractors that India is serious about resolving conflicts quickly and fairly. 

Clear mechanism

The latest Vivad se vishwas scheme, announced in July 2024, focuses again on direct tax disputes. Known as Vivad se vishwas 2.0, it aims to resolve income tax disputes pending as of July 22, 2024. Irrespective of whether these disputes are pending in the Supreme Court, high courts, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), or the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the scheme offers taxpayers a chance to settle cases by paying a percentage of the disputed tax, penalty, or interest. 

What is noteworthy is the range of cases covered. It addresses not only disputes pending in courts, but also cases where objections have been filed before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) and where the DRP is yet to issue a directive to the assessing officer. This ensures that the net is cast far and wide, enabling as many taxpayers as possible to benefit from the scheme. Taxpayers who settle their ‘disputed tax’ cases by the end of December 2024 will pay 100 per cent of the disputed tax, while the interest and penalty on the disputed amount shall be waived. However, those who settle after that date will pay a slight premium equivalent to 110 per cent of the disputed tax. The scheme also offers significant relief to taxpayers involved in disputes over penalties or interest, with the settlement capped at 25-35 per cent of the disputed amounts.Going by the past iterations, this scheme is expected to resolve thousands of pending disputes, providing much-needed certainty to businesses and individuals alike. 

The mechanism is straightforward. Taxpayers file a declaration with the designated authority, who then calculates the amount to be paid. Once the taxpayer pays up, the dispute is considered closed, and any pending litigation is withdrawn. This seamless process makes the scheme attractive to both the taxpayer and the government, as it saves on the time and resources spent on protracted court battles. 

Long-term need

While the Vivad se vishwas schemes have been successful in offering short-term relief, there is a need to acknowledge their limitations. They are, by design, one-time measures aimed at clearing backlogs. For long-term sustainability, more robust reforms are needed. 

The Vivad se vishwas schemes, particularly the latest iteration, have certainly had a positive impact on the business ecosystem. By reducing litigation, they free up capital, allowing businesses to focus on growth rather than prolonged legal battles. This, in turn, boosts investor confidence, making India a more attractive destination for both domestic and international investment. 

While these initiatives offer a commendable stopgap solution, the government must turn its attention to long-term reforms that address the root causes of disputes and litigation. Only then can India’s judiciary be relieved of its crushing burden, paving the way for the nation to truly emerge as a global hub for business and investment. 

(The writers are advocates at Trinity Chambers, Delhi)

More Like This

Published on September 29, 2024