惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Jina AI
Jina AI
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
罗磊的独立博客
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
U
Unit 42
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
V
V2EX
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
L
LangChain Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
G
Google Developers Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
雷峰网
雷峰网
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
F
Fortinet All Blogs

Latest Business Laws, Legal Insights, News & Updates | The HinduBusinessLine

Corporations have a fundamental duty to protect ecosystem: SC holds How to copyright colours Only strong reforms can clear massive backlog of court cases SC reasserts ‘bail is the rule’ doctrine in landmark ruling Misleading ads: How global brands are testing India’s regulatory framework How the Supreme Court verdict is set to reshape India’s mining industry Income Tax tribunal paves way for double deduction claims Where does the liability of the principal borrower begin and end? Why fixed-dose combination drugs need a tighter leash Who is a ‘workman’? SC reiterates binding nature of government tenders Corporate guarantee: A ‘yearly’ quandary A treaty to protect traditional knowledge IBBI’s proposed ‘guarantees’ under fire Guidelines diminish arbitration’s role in government procurement disputes Tooth-and-nail fight over trademark colours RBI expands overseas portfolio investment options Balancing business revival and creditor interests under IBC: A statistical insight Upholding tenets of fairness in arbitration ‘Conscious acceptance’ necessary for arbitration agreements AI under new management: EU sets global standard with Artificial Intelligence Act DMRC vs DAMEPL: A legal rollercoaster culminates as SC presents ‘cure’ Indian innovators rally behind Digital Competition Bill New CCI regulations: Tightening the reins on confidential information Amending nuclear law to spur ‘pink’ hydrogen generation Level up or Log out: India’s gaming industry at a crossroads Blurred boundaries: Taxing escrowed funds in M&A deals When insolvency meets money laundering Strengthening whistleblowers’ hands Electoral bonds case: Transparency triumphs over donors’ right to privacy
No consideration, no tax
By Team Gavel · 2024-04-07 · via Latest Business Laws, Legal Insights, News & Updates | The HinduBusinessLine
SENSEX   75,527.95

+ 1,695.40

NIFTY   23,622.90

+ 461.30

CRUDEOIL   8,084.00

 -260.00

GOLD   150,650.00

+ 1,718.00

SILVER   246,714.00

+ 7,061.00

SENSEX   75,527.95

+ 1,695.40

NIFTY   23,622.90

+ 461.30

NIFTY   23,622.90

+ 461.30

CRUDEOIL   8,084.00

 -260.00

CRUDEOIL   8,084.00

 -260.00

GOLD   150,650.00

+ 1,718.00

If a service is rendered, but no consideration is received, service tax cannot be charged, according to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Tribunal.  

Updated - April 07, 2024 at 05:47 PM.

If a service is rendered, but no consideration is received, service tax cannot be charged, according to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Tribunal.

The Tribunal rejected the tax authorities’ contention that a notional value of what could have been the consideration, could be the basis of levying a service tax.

Pharmax Corporation provided various services and pays service tax on them. However, it had also provided corporate guarantee on behalf of its sister concerns, but not charged any commission or fee for that.

Revenue authorities argued that if the sister concerns had approached a bank, the bank would have charged them fees, which would be taxable in the hands of the banks. Such fees would have been taxable in the hands of the banks under the category of “Banking & Financial Services”. Therefore, even if Pharmax had not received any consideration for the corporate guarantees which it had provided, a notional value equivalent to the amount which banks could have charged for similar services should be taken as a consideration and service tax should be charged on such notional amount.

The Tribunal held that a service tax can be charged only when there is a service provider, a service recipient and a consideration for the service. The tax liability falls on the service provider. If a service is provided but no consideration is received, no service tax can be charged. The consideration shall be deemed Rs 0; as such, the tax liability shall also be Rs 0.

This issue has been settled in many decisions.

In the present case, there is not an iota of doubt that no consideration was received at all because the show cause notice itself says so. This being the position, the impugned order is correct and proper and calls for no interference. Appeal dismissed.

Published on April 7, 2024

THIS AD SUPPORTS OUR JOURNALISM. SUBSCRIBE FOR MINIMAL ADS.

THIS AD SUPPORTS OUR JOURNALISM. SUBSCRIBE FOR MINIMAL ADS.