惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

H
Heimdal Security Blog
A
Arctic Wolf
K
Kaspersky official blog
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
D
Docker
爱范儿
爱范儿
T
Tenable Blog
C
Check Point Blog
B
Blog
C
Cisco Blogs
Vercel News
Vercel News
The Cloudflare Blog
T
Threatpost
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
T
Tor Project blog
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
博客园 - 司徒正美
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
GbyAI
GbyAI
S
Secure Thoughts
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园_首页
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
雷峰网
雷峰网
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
U
Unit 42
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
V
Visual Studio Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell

Latest Business Laws, Legal Insights, News & Updates | The HinduBusinessLine

Corporations have a fundamental duty to protect ecosystem: SC holds How to copyright colours Only strong reforms can clear massive backlog of court cases SC reasserts ‘bail is the rule’ doctrine in landmark ruling Misleading ads: How global brands are testing India’s regulatory framework How the Supreme Court verdict is set to reshape India’s mining industry Income Tax tribunal paves way for double deduction claims Where does the liability of the principal borrower begin and end? Why fixed-dose combination drugs need a tighter leash Who is a ‘workman’? SC reiterates binding nature of government tenders Corporate guarantee: A ‘yearly’ quandary A treaty to protect traditional knowledge IBBI’s proposed ‘guarantees’ under fire Guidelines diminish arbitration’s role in government procurement disputes Tooth-and-nail fight over trademark colours RBI expands overseas portfolio investment options Balancing business revival and creditor interests under IBC: A statistical insight Upholding tenets of fairness in arbitration ‘Conscious acceptance’ necessary for arbitration agreements DMRC vs DAMEPL: A legal rollercoaster culminates as SC presents ‘cure’ Indian innovators rally behind Digital Competition Bill New CCI regulations: Tightening the reins on confidential information Amending nuclear law to spur ‘pink’ hydrogen generation Level up or Log out: India’s gaming industry at a crossroads Blurred boundaries: Taxing escrowed funds in M&A deals No consideration, no tax When insolvency meets money laundering Strengthening whistleblowers’ hands Electoral bonds case: Transparency triumphs over donors’ right to privacy Arbitration trumps criminality Vedanta’s environmental violations: A wake-up call for industries Mediation, the future of insolvency resolution? Interpreting Sec 29A(c) of IBC: NCLAT shows how No liability for directors who resigned before cheque issue, rules SC How to save deals from falling apart Madras High Court backs taxpayer in GST delayed payments interest case The promise of voluntary carbon market Are compulsorily convertible debentures debt or equity? Navigating the pre-arbitration maze Making deepfakes work Dissenting creditor’s settlement issue sent to larger bench The permanence of skill in the arena of monetary play SC solves the stamp duty puzzle in arbitration Trademark issues in naming drugs Nomination is not a statutory testament, says Supreme Court in landmark verdict The EU’s AI Act and the Brussels effect Apex court rules in favour of Jindal Steel RBI rules for cybersecurity in financial institutions Non-signatories join the arbitration bandwagon Ramakrishna Forgings wins at SC, set to bag ACIL Is women’s reservation merely a paper tiger? SC gives confidence boost to creditors in landmark verdict Revolutionising real estate insolvency with enhanced protections for homebuyers Property redevelopment approvals: Lessons from Bombay HC M Sricharan RangaRajan’s ‘Treatise on Arbitration’ provides a detailed insight on arbitration CCI’s new merger norms: Hits and misses Streamlining civil litigation: Supreme Court’s comprehensive guidelines Demat mandated for private companies too
AI under new management: EU sets global standard with Artificial Intelligence Act
By Team Gavel · 2024-06-02 · via Latest Business Laws, Legal Insights, News & Updates | The HinduBusinessLine

On May 21, the European Union (EU) came out with the world’s first Artificial Intelligence Act. The legislation is meant to establish a unified regulatory and legal framework for AI. The Act also establishes the European Artificial Intelligence Board to facilitate national cooperation and ensure compliance.

The new law aims to balance the needs to promote the development and adoption of safe and trustworthy AI systems and, at the same time, make sure that the fundamental rights of citizens are protected.

Similar to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the AI Act has extraterritorial applications — meaning it applies to non-EU providers with users within the EU. The Act covers a wide range of AI applications across various sectors, with exceptions for systems used solely for military, national security, research and non-professional purposes. As a product regulation, it does not confer individual rights but regulates AI system providers and professional users.

In response to the rise of generative AI systems, such as ChatGPT, the draft Act was revised to accommodate these general-purpose capabilities, which initially did not fit the main regulatory framework. More restrictive regulations are planned for powerful generative AI systems with systemic impacts.

The AI Act categorises non-exempted AI applications based on their risk of causing harm, dividing them into four levels: unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal risk, with an additional category for general-purpose AI. Applications deemed unacceptable are banned. High-risk applications must adhere to stringent security, transparency and quality obligations, and undergo conformity assessments. Limited-risk applications are subject to transparency obligations, while minimal-risk applications are not regulated. For general-purpose AI, transparency requirements are imposed, with additional evaluations for high-capability models. This risk-based classification ensures that the regulation addresses the varying degrees of potential harm posed by different AI applications.

The new regulation will come into effect two years after its commencement, with certain exceptions for specific provisions. This timeframe provides entities in this sector ample opportunity to establish governance mechanisms to meet the new legislative requirements.

Organisations may use this time to develop a compliance pathway, defining timelines, milestones and compliance audit procedures. They could also set up a risk management framework. This would not only ensure compliance with the Act, but also help develop a customer base.

Published on June 2, 2024