The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has rejected a joint petition filed by five banks – Indian Bank, UCO Bank, Bank of Baroda, ICICI Bank and Union Bank of India – challenging the distribution of funds to the dissenting financial creditors SBI and Punjab National Bank.

A two-member National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) bench said the distribution mechanism for funds received from the resolution plan approved by the lenders' body CoC in its commercial wisdom, and subsequently, the NCLT order is valid, lawful and binding.

The bench said that the 'Monitoring Committee' formed after the bidding process was over and “could not have altered the same.”

"We are of the view that the payment directed to Respondent No 1 (SBI) is strictly in accordance with Section 30(2)(b), read with Section 53(1) of the Code which the CoC has duly approved and thereafter, by the AA, under Section 30(4), does not suffer from any inequity or illegality," said the NCLAT bench, comprising Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Member (Technical) Indevar Pandey.

The matter related to the insolvency proceedings of OCL Iron and Steel, for which the Cuttack Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has approved the bids filed by Indrani Patnaik.

The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against OCL Iron and Steel was initiated in September 2021.

Upon collation of claims, a Committee of Creditors was constituted comprising of nine financial creditors with voting shares - Asia Opportunities (III) Mauritius Limited (36.22 per cent), ICICI Bank (12.68 per cent), State Bank of India (10.39 per cent), Indian Bank (10.32 per cent), UCO Bank (9.82 per cent), Bank of Baroda (7.87 per cent), Union Bank of India (7.11 per cent), Punjab National Bank (0.63 per cent) and Ganesh Ores (4.98 per cent).

The Resolution Plan submitted by Indrani Patnaik was approved by the CoC through an 88.98 per cent majority vote, and the NCLT approved it on March 20, 2023, following which a Monitoring Committee was constituted to oversee the implementation of the resolution plan.

However, in the third and fourth meetings of the Monitoring Committee, there was a lack of consensus regarding distribution to dissenting financial creditors. Calculations regarding the distribution of Resolution Plan proceeds were placed before the members.

Meanwhile, Indrani Patnaik, being the Successful Resolution bidder, transferred an amount of ₹35.20 crore on May 15, 2023, to State Bank of India as a dissenting financial creditor.

Aggrieved by the same State Bank of India filed an application before the NCLT, seeking to set aside the distribution decided in the fourth Monitoring Committee meeting.

Passing an order on February 5, 2024, the NCLT directed that distribution to State Bank of India, being the dissenting financial creditor, be made in accordance with Section 30(2)(b) of the Code as computed by the Evaluation Advisor, and further directed that the computation of liquidation value be re-checked and payment be made accordingly.

Aggrieved by this NCLT order mandating distribution to the dissenting secured financial creditor out of the upfront payment, the five banks - Indian Bank, UCO Bank, Bank of Baroda, ICICI Bank and Union Bank of India - filed an appeal before the NCLAT.

However, the NCLAT said the NCLT order “does not confer any undue or additional benefit upon Respondent No. 1 (SBI), but merely enforces the liquidation value already determined and approved.”

Published on April 9, 2026