惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
B
Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
爱范儿
爱范儿
月光博客
月光博客
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Vercel News
Vercel News
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
腾讯CDC
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻

MEDIANAMA

India in talks with US, Anthropic for Mythos access; no Indian firms in Project Glasswing yet Eternal Q4FY26: All Users Pay Higher Platform Fee, Only Some Get Discounts Amazon, Meta to challenge PhonePe-Google Pay dominance as UPI cap delayed since 2020 Meta failed to protect the safety of under-13s: European Commission If markets and regulators are ready for network slicing, we are ready: JIO Why defining ‘news’ won’t fix the free speech problems of draft IT Rules? #NAMA Eternal Q4FY26: Goyal Dismisses AI Disruption Risk as Zomato Quietly Builds Agentic Commerce Infrastructure Karnataka files appeal challenging the bike taxi ban lift in the Supreme Court How did WhatsApp turn 17 govt. flags into 9,400 digital arrest scam bans? Google Wallet integrates Aadhaar as digital ID, expands India’s mobile identity ecosystem Kerala HC issues notice on MediaOne’s Facebook page block in India MeitY warns VPN providers against enabling access to blocked betting platforms Shreya Singhal targeted private censorship. Today’s threat is the State #NAMA Amazon scales its quick delivery service ‘Amazon Now’ in 100 cities Can MeitY issue binding rules via advisories? Experts raise alarm over draft IT Rules #NAMA How 2019 election code of ethics became India’s three-hour content takedown mandate #NAMA Australia proposes new levy on big tech to fund news, opens draft law for consultation ‘judge, jury, executioner’: experts warn of Inter-Departmental Committee (IDC) overreach under New draft IT Rules Lowdown: TRAI flags low deployment under PM-WANI in public Wi-Fi consultation paper Why the NBFC licence matters for MobiKwik China blocks Meta-Manus deal, asserts origin-country jurisdiction: what this means for India ‘No transparency’: experts warn of expanding powers to block online speech in India #NAMA X launches standalone iOS messaging app XChat with encryption in India How India’s content takedown framework was built and where It has gone wrong #NAMA Claude Mythos puts India on alert: CERT-In, telcos, banks assess unprecedented cyber risks Explained: why did the RBI cancel Paytm’s banking licence? Meta now instantly blocks content in India Govt. asks ZEE5 to halt ‘Lawrence of Punjab’ web series release Online Gaming Rules notified, to be in effect from May 1, what are the major changes? RBI mandates additional factor authentication for e-mandates
UK under-16 social media ban: Public consultation findings
Azdhan · 2026-06-16 · via MEDIANAMA

Important References: 

  • Growing up in the online world: progress statement — [ PDF | Archived ]
  • 4-page summary of the report — [ PDF | Archived ]
  • June progress statement: summary of evidence, methodology, and organisations who responded to the consultation — [ PDF | Archived ]

On June 15, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that the UK government will ban children from accessing social media and enforce stricter age-gating mechanisms to ensure under-16s are protected from the harms and risks of social media and the internet. You can read MediaNama’s reporting of the announcement and the subsequent press conference here

Following this announcement, the UK government released some of the responses it received through its public consultation process. Here are some of the key details from their public consultation report.

How many responses did the UK consultation receive? The UK government ran the public consultation for about 85 days, from 2 March 2026 to 26 May 2026. The distribution of respondents is as follows: 

  • Children: (at least) 14,000 — 12.05% 
  • Parents: (more than) 54,000 — 46.46%
  • Organizations: 600 — 0.51%
  • Total: 1,16,211

Interestingly, the short summary of the full report often cites children’s responses before outlining the government’s regulatory approach. 

Key Findings: 

  • Over 60% of children support some age restrictions: “Two-thirds of children who responded to the consultation told us that they would support age restrictions for under 16s on at least some social media.”
  • 90% of parents support the complete ban: “90% of parents told us they would support under-16s not being allowed on social media.”

Children who responded said they supported restrictions on the following features: 

  • Sending explicit images (63%),
  • connecting to strangers (49%) and,
  • livestreaming (45%).

Therefore, the UK government says that even gaming applications cannot offer these features to under-16s, and platforms can’t enable them automatically. These features should be accessible only if the user voluntarily enables them. 

How many people thought social media has more benefits to offer than risks? 

  • Children: “40% of children thought the benefits outweighed the risks.”
  • Parents: “Only 11% of respondents to the parents’ consultation agreed that the benefits of being on social media outweighed the risks.”

Social media benefits vs harms: More than 25,000 respondents who answered this question identified the following as the benefits and harms of social media and of children’s access to those platforms.

  • Social connection and learning: The reported benefits are connection, information, learning, education, and friendship as primary positives, alongside communication, community support, and access to interest-based content and entertainment.
  • Harms center on mental health and exposure to risks: The dominant concerns are mental health, bullying, exposure to inappropriate content, addiction, misinformation, and lack of safety, alongside cyberbullying, predatory behavior, and impacts on self-esteem and screen time.

The UK followed a mixed approach to the public consultation process: It used multiple-choice questions, open-ended responses and email submissions.

  • AI analysis for open-ended questions: For open-ended responses, they deployed UK-owned Consult, an AI tool built specifically to analyze public consultation feedback. 
  • Manual analysis for civil society and stakeholder responses: The UK government says it individually reviewed 279 email responses from civil society groups, businesses and stakeholders. 

UK MP Kanishka Narayan also engaged with young people at forums such as the Youth Town Hall. He is the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. View some pictures of his interaction with children here

‘Risky’ designed-for-adults AI platforms will be banned for children: 66% of children have reportedly said that AI should have minimum age limits. “So, the riskiest ones, designed with adults in mind, will only be for people who are 18 and older,” stated the government. 

“95% of responses to the parents’ consultation thought AI chatbots should have functionality restrictions, and 74% of young people (16-21) thought the same,” stated the report. 

General-purpose AI chatbots won’t be banned; the features that enable sexualised interactions will be banned: “We therefore intend to ensure that chatbots whose primary purpose is to provide sexual relationships to their users cannot be accessed by children. Access to general-purpose AI models will not be age-gated. However, to access features on general-purpose models that enable sexually explicit interaction, a user would need to prove that they are over 18.”

What are the obligations on platforms? They need to do the following things: 

  • “Ask for proof of your age,
  • Use accurate technology to estimate how old they think you are.”

17-year-olds may get a night curfew without a choice to turn off; UK to finalize this in July:  “In July, we will set out our final decision on an optional nighttime curfew on social media between midnight and 6 am for 16 and 17-year-olds. This means overnight restrictions would be on as standard, but could be turned off by individuals”. This regulation may also target the ‘addictive features’. It stated that it would review the evidence before enforcing such restrictions. 

UK children will not have access to social media even if they have parental consent: “Under these rules, social media apps or websites will not be allowed to offer their services to children under 16, even if you have permission from your parent or carer”

Which platforms will be barred from offering services to under-16s? Since the UK is yet to legislate the proposals, there is no final official list of platforms that must comply. However, it said it will follow the list of social media apps recognized by Australia’s law. They are: Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, Twitch, X, YouTube, Kick and Reddit. 

 UK hasn’t decided on the narrow list of exemptions like music streaming and e-commerce platforms: “Our approach will be targeted and proportionate. Nearly a third of people who responded to our full consultation thought that educational and cultural sites, such as libraries and museums, should be exempt from age restrictions. There will be a narrowly defined list of exemptions, including, for example, educational services, e-commerce platforms and music streaming. We will keep this definition under review.”

UK wants platforms to be redesigned for young people, especially for useful information: “Access to high-quality and educational content remains essential. While many children may currently access content like the news through social media and video sharing platforms,10 these are not the only – nor always the most reliable – sources of high-quality, educational and news content. We want to see more high-quality services designed specifically for young people.”

Device-level age restrictions are under review; this is to ensure a better user experience for adults: “We think that by keeping under-16s off social media, preventing children from communicating with strangers and requiring more device-level protections for children, which prevent the taking, sharing or viewing of nude images, we will address these main risks. We think this approach will ensure children are protected in a way that is proportionate and risk-based and will not require adults to complete age checks where it may not be necessary. But we will keep this under review.”

Most parents supported more frequent age checks for adults for the sake of child safety: “81% of respondents to the parents’ consultation and 63% of respondents to the full consultation agreed that “adults should complete age checks more often, if it means children are safer online”.

UK plans to work with the tech industry to develop more accurate age-assessment tools: “We plan to improve the availability of age assurance for 16- 17-year-olds.” This includes exploring easier access to secure, privacy-preserving ways for people to prove their age online – such as reusable checks that confirm they meet an age threshold without requiring full ID each time. We will support the development of standards, to make it clear to industry and the public what best practice looks like for trustworthy age assurance technologies.”

UK will publish a detailed roadmap report in July 2026: A further update will be published on the full range of questions asked by 16 July 2026, including: 

  • Possible further default protections for 16- and 17-year-olds, such as restrictions overnight and on other design features, like infinite scroll,
  • Whether the age of digital consent should be raised,
  • Risks of circumvention through the use of virtual private networks,
  • Media literacy support for parents.

Go deeper: 

  • Savanta’s Children’s Wellbeing Online: Social Media Quantitative Report — [ PDF ]
  • Summary of Ministerial and official engagement as part of the National Conversation — [ PDF ]
  • June progress statement: summary of evidence, methodology, and organisations who responded to the consultation — [ PDF ]
  • UK Government’s Media Literacy Action Plan (2026-2029) — [ URL ]
  • UK Media Use and Attitudes Report — [PDF ]
  • Understanding the impact of smartphones and social media on children and young people – [ URL ]
  • Feasibility Study of Methods and Data to Understand the Impact of Smartphones and Social Media on Children and Young People  – [ PDF ]
  • Me, myself and AI: Understanding and safeguarding children’s use of AI chatbots — [ PDF ]
  •  “Darling, Please Come Back Soon”: Sexual Exploitation, Manipulation, and Violence on Character AI Kids’ Accounts — [ PDF ]

Also Read: