惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

腾讯CDC
博客园 - Franky
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
L
LangChain Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - 司徒正美
量子位
A
About on SuperTechFans
C
Check Point Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
小众软件
小众软件
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
I
InfoQ
V
Visual Studio Blog
Vercel News
Vercel News
B
Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
U
Unit 42

MEDIANAMA

India in talks with US, Anthropic for Mythos access; no Indian firms in Project Glasswing yet Eternal Q4FY26: All Users Pay Higher Platform Fee, Only Some Get Discounts Amazon, Meta to challenge PhonePe-Google Pay dominance as UPI cap delayed since 2020 Meta failed to protect the safety of under-13s: European Commission If markets and regulators are ready for network slicing, we are ready: JIO Why defining ‘news’ won’t fix the free speech problems of draft IT Rules? #NAMA Eternal Q4FY26: Goyal Dismisses AI Disruption Risk as Zomato Quietly Builds Agentic Commerce Infrastructure Karnataka files appeal challenging the bike taxi ban lift in the Supreme Court How did WhatsApp turn 17 govt. flags into 9,400 digital arrest scam bans? Google Wallet integrates Aadhaar as digital ID, expands India’s mobile identity ecosystem Kerala HC issues notice on MediaOne’s Facebook page block in India MeitY warns VPN providers against enabling access to blocked betting platforms Shreya Singhal targeted private censorship. Today’s threat is the State #NAMA Amazon scales its quick delivery service ‘Amazon Now’ in 100 cities Can MeitY issue binding rules via advisories? Experts raise alarm over draft IT Rules #NAMA How 2019 election code of ethics became India’s three-hour content takedown mandate #NAMA Australia proposes new levy on big tech to fund news, opens draft law for consultation ‘judge, jury, executioner’: experts warn of Inter-Departmental Committee (IDC) overreach under New draft IT Rules Lowdown: TRAI flags low deployment under PM-WANI in public Wi-Fi consultation paper Why the NBFC licence matters for MobiKwik China blocks Meta-Manus deal, asserts origin-country jurisdiction: what this means for India ‘No transparency’: experts warn of expanding powers to block online speech in India #NAMA X launches standalone iOS messaging app XChat with encryption in India How India’s content takedown framework was built and where It has gone wrong #NAMA Claude Mythos puts India on alert: CERT-In, telcos, banks assess unprecedented cyber risks Explained: why did the RBI cancel Paytm’s banking licence? Meta now instantly blocks content in India Govt. asks ZEE5 to halt ‘Lawrence of Punjab’ web series release Online Gaming Rules notified, to be in effect from May 1, what are the major changes? RBI mandates additional factor authentication for e-mandates
Canada says age checks must be proportionate and privacy-...
Rohit Singh · 2026-05-13 · via MEDIANAMA
  • Access the original blog from here

Canada’s privacy regulator has opened a public consultation on how websites and online platforms should use age checks to protect children online, while warning that age assurance systems themselves can create new privacy risks if deployed without safeguards. The consultation will remain open until August 4, 2026.

Philippe Dufresne, Privacy Commissioner of Canada, launched the guidance on May 4 during the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) Canada Symposium in Toronto as part of Privacy Awareness Week 2026. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada developed the framework after conducting an earlier public consultation on age assurance technologies.

The regulator said organizations should not make age assurance “the default condition for accessing the Internet” and should use it only where the law requires it or where children face a specific risk of harm.

When platforms may need to use age checks: The document identifies two broad situations where platforms may need to differentiate users by age: when they restrict access to certain services or content, and when they change platform features or data practices for younger users.

The guidance says companies blocking access based on age should be able to show either that the law requires them to do so or that children face a clear risk from accessing the service. Examples mentioned include pornography, gambling, dating services, and products with age restrictions.

At the same time, the regulator warned against excessive data collection in the name of child safety. It said platforms must ensure that any age assurance system collects information that is “proportional to the risk being addressed.”

Concerns over profiling and data collection: The guidance also highlights risks linked to modern online platforms, including detailed profiling, behavioural advertising, unrestricted private messaging, and systems that encourage children to share sensitive personal information.

Instead of forcing all users through age checks, the regulator asked companies to first consider less intrusive alternatives. It suggested measures such as disabling behavioural advertising for suspected child users, using child-safe defaults, or limiting risky features without requiring identity verification from every user.

The document also stresses that companies should not use age assurance data for advertising, profiling, or linking user activity across services. “Age assurance systems should be designed in a way that relying parties are not able to use age assurance results to correlate multiple visits by the same user,” it said.

The regulator further said platforms must provide appeal mechanisms to users denied access because of an age check and, where possible, offer multiple privacy-protective methods to prove age.

Children’s Privacy Code and wider policy push: The guidance comes as the Canadian privacy regulator is also preparing a broader Children’s Privacy Code. The Office said it has separately consulted businesses, researchers, and young users on online privacy, child safety, and digital harms to help shape future policy recommendations.

Commissioner Dufresne said, “Age assurance can be a valuable mechanism to advance the goal of reducing potential harms experienced by children online. In providing this new guidance on age assurance, my aim is to help organizations to implement age assurance in ways that mitigate the impacts on privacy.”

Read more: