惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Jina AI
Jina AI
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
IT之家
IT之家
美团技术团队
V
Visual Studio Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 叶小钗
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
GbyAI
GbyAI
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
腾讯CDC
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
月光博客
月光博客
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 司徒正美
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog

MEDIANAMA

India in talks with US, Anthropic for Mythos access; no Indian firms in Project Glasswing yet Including OTTs in TRAI’s spam protection draft rules a ‘regulatory overreach’: IAMAI Eternal Q4FY26: All Users Pay Higher Platform Fee, Only Some Get Discounts Amazon, Meta to challenge PhonePe-Google Pay dominance as UPI cap delayed since 2020 Meta failed to protect the safety of under-13s: European Commission If markets and regulators are ready for network slicing, we are ready: JIO Why defining ‘news’ won’t fix the free speech problems of draft IT Rules? #NAMA Eternal Q4FY26: Goyal Dismisses AI Disruption Risk as Zomato Quietly Builds Agentic Commerce Infrastructure Karnataka files appeal challenging the bike taxi ban lift in the Supreme Court How did WhatsApp turn 17 govt. flags into 9,400 digital arrest scam bans? Google Wallet integrates Aadhaar as digital ID, expands India’s mobile identity ecosystem Kerala HC issues notice on MediaOne’s Facebook page block in India MeitY warns VPN providers against enabling access to blocked betting platforms Shreya Singhal targeted private censorship. Today’s threat is the State #NAMA Amazon scales its quick delivery service ‘Amazon Now’ in 100 cities Can MeitY issue binding rules via advisories? Experts raise alarm over draft IT Rules #NAMA How 2019 election code of ethics became India’s three-hour content takedown mandate #NAMA Australia proposes new levy on big tech to fund news, opens draft law for consultation ‘judge, jury, executioner’: experts warn of Inter-Departmental Committee (IDC) overreach under New draft IT Rules Lowdown: TRAI flags low deployment under PM-WANI in public Wi-Fi consultation paper Why the NBFC licence matters for MobiKwik China blocks Meta-Manus deal, asserts origin-country jurisdiction: what this means for India ‘No transparency’: experts warn of expanding powers to block online speech in India #NAMA X launches standalone iOS messaging app XChat with encryption in India How India’s content takedown framework was built and where It has gone wrong #NAMA Claude Mythos puts India on alert: CERT-In, telcos, banks assess unprecedented cyber risks Explained: why did the RBI cancel Paytm’s banking licence? Meta now instantly blocks content in India Govt. asks ZEE5 to halt ‘Lawrence of Punjab’ web series release Online Gaming Rules notified, to be in effect from May 1, what are the major changes?
European Commission proposes Google have to share search ...
Rohit Singh · 2026-04-17 · via MEDIANAMA
  • You can access the original blog post from here
  • You can download the Press release from here
  • You can download the case summary from here
  • You can download the preliminary measures from here

The European Commission has proposed measures that would require Google to share key search data with rival search engines and AI services as part of its ongoing case under the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The move is aimed at reducing Google’s dominance and enabling competitors to improve their services.

Alphabet, Google’s parent company, was designated a “gatekeeper” in September 2023, bringing it under the DMA’s stricter rules. In January 2026, the Commission opened proceedings to define how Google must comply with its obligation to share search data. On April 16, it released preliminary findings outlining what those measures should look like.

What data Google may have to share: Under the proposal, Google would have to share a broad set of anonymised data, including user queries, clicks, rankings and what users see on search results pages. This data would be made available to eligible third parties operating search engines in the European Economic Area, including AI chatbots with search functionalities.

To ensure usability, Google may be required to provide access through tools like APIs, with data shared as frequently as it uses internally and retained for at least five years. At the same time, the Commission has proposed strict anonymisation rules. These include removing identifiers such as IP addresses, limiting sensitive or rare queries, and applying technical and contractual safeguards to prevent users from being re-identified. Companies accessing the data would face restrictions on how they use and store it, as well as audit requirements.

Pricing, access and regulatory timeline: The proposal also sets limits on pricing. Google would be allowed to charge only the incremental cost of sharing the data, along with a reasonable return, restricting its ability to impose high fees.

The Commission has also outlined a process for access, including eligibility checks, sample datasets for testing, and conditions under which access can be refused or withdrawn.

The regulator is now seeking feedback from companies and the public on whether these measures are effective and practical. Submissions are open until May 1, and a final decision is expected by July 27, 2026. The decision will be binding on Google.

Google pushes back, privacy concerns raised: The case highlights concerns that control over search data gives Google a structural advantage, particularly as search increasingly overlaps with AI services.

Google has opposed the proposal. Clare Kelly, the company’s senior competition counsel, said: “Hundreds of millions of Europeans trust Google with their ⁠most sensitive searches – including private questions about their health, family, and finances – and the Commission’s proposal would force us to hand this data over to third parties, with dangerously ineffective privacy protections.”

The Commission retains the power to separately find Google in breach of the DMA, which could lead to fines of up to 10% of its global annual revenue, as per a Reuters report.

Read More: