惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
G
Google Developers Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
月光博客
月光博客
爱范儿
爱范儿
罗磊的独立博客
腾讯CDC
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
Vercel News
Vercel News
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
B
Blog
C
Check Point Blog
美团技术团队
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻

MEDIANAMA

India in talks with US, Anthropic for Mythos access; no Indian firms in Project Glasswing yet Including OTTs in TRAI’s spam protection draft rules a ‘regulatory overreach’: IAMAI Eternal Q4FY26: All Users Pay Higher Platform Fee, Only Some Get Discounts Amazon, Meta to challenge PhonePe-Google Pay dominance as UPI cap delayed since 2020 Meta failed to protect the safety of under-13s: European Commission If markets and regulators are ready for network slicing, we are ready: JIO Why defining ‘news’ won’t fix the free speech problems of draft IT Rules? #NAMA Eternal Q4FY26: Goyal Dismisses AI Disruption Risk as Zomato Quietly Builds Agentic Commerce Infrastructure Karnataka files appeal challenging the bike taxi ban lift in the Supreme Court How did WhatsApp turn 17 govt. flags into 9,400 digital arrest scam bans? Google Wallet integrates Aadhaar as digital ID, expands India’s mobile identity ecosystem Kerala HC issues notice on MediaOne’s Facebook page block in India MeitY warns VPN providers against enabling access to blocked betting platforms Shreya Singhal targeted private censorship. Today’s threat is the State #NAMA Amazon scales its quick delivery service ‘Amazon Now’ in 100 cities Can MeitY issue binding rules via advisories? Experts raise alarm over draft IT Rules #NAMA How 2019 election code of ethics became India’s three-hour content takedown mandate #NAMA Australia proposes new levy on big tech to fund news, opens draft law for consultation ‘judge, jury, executioner’: experts warn of Inter-Departmental Committee (IDC) overreach under New draft IT Rules Lowdown: TRAI flags low deployment under PM-WANI in public Wi-Fi consultation paper Why the NBFC licence matters for MobiKwik China blocks Meta-Manus deal, asserts origin-country jurisdiction: what this means for India ‘No transparency’: experts warn of expanding powers to block online speech in India #NAMA X launches standalone iOS messaging app XChat with encryption in India How India’s content takedown framework was built and where It has gone wrong #NAMA Claude Mythos puts India on alert: CERT-In, telcos, banks assess unprecedented cyber risks Meta now instantly blocks content in India Govt. asks ZEE5 to halt ‘Lawrence of Punjab’ web series release Online Gaming Rules notified, to be in effect from May 1, what are the major changes? RBI mandates additional factor authentication for e-mandates
Explained: why did the RBI cancel Paytm’s banking licence?
Amit Singh · 2026-04-27 · via MEDIANAMA

Copy of the press release

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has cancelled the banking licence of Paytm Payments Bank Limited. The action was expected, albeit just a formality. The central bank effectively shut down Paytm’s payments bank business in February 2024, when it banned the fintech company from accepting fresh deposits or top-ups in its Payments Bank accounts, wallets, and FASTags. These measures were in addition to a previous restriction on the Payments Bank, barring it from onboarding new customers since March 2022.

Why this matters: In January last year, the Paytm founder Vijay Shekhar Sharma told Bloomberg that he expected the Payments Bank to return to business soon. “We’ve learnt our lessons, and we’ve dramatically changed our approach towards the business,” he said.

However, the formal cancellation of the Payments Bank licence has all but shattered that hope. Sharma owned a 51% stake in the bank, and the remaining stake was held by One97 Communications, which owns the Paytm brand.

Had the Payments Bank run smoothly for five years, it could have converted into a Small Finance Bank. That would have allowed Paytm to also enter the lucrative lending business.

What the RBI has said now: The Payments Bank’s operations were conducted in a manner “detrimental to the bank and its depositors” in violation of Section 22 (3)(b) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (BR Act).

  • The bank’s management was prejudicial to the interests of depositors and the public. Therefore, it flouted the provisions of Section 22 (3)(c) of the BR Act, which stipulate that regulators grant or maintain a banking license only if a bank’s proposed or existing management does not prejudice the public interest or the interests of its depositors.
  • Allowing the bank to operate as envisaged in Section 22 (3)(e) of the BR Act would not have served any useful purpose.
  • The bank failed to comply with the conditions stipulated in its Payments Bank license, thereby violating Section 22(3)(g) of the BR Act. Failure to comply with these conditions, particularly those crucial for protecting depositors, can result in the cancellation of the license.
  • The RBI stated that, effective April 24, 2026, it now prohibits Paytm Payments Bank from conducting the business of ‘banking’ as defined in Section 5(b) or any additional business specified under Section 6 of the BR Act.

What is Paytm’s response? In a statement, the company said its Payments Bank has sufficient liquidity to repay all customer deposits.

  • The directive does not affect user deposits in the bank’s savings or current accounts, prepaid instruments, wallets, FASTags, or National Common Mobility Cards. However, Paytm did not clarify whether users could withdraw or transfer these funds or if there was a temporary freeze.

Under the RBI scanner since 2018: Paytm Payments Bank has been in the regulator’s crosshairs since at least 2018 due to persistent non-compliance. As per an article in CNBC TV-18,

“The RBI had found 31 crore out of 35 crore Paytm Wallets inoperative in its inspection, cases where a single PAN card was linked to thousands of accounts, absence of KYC for lakhs of accounts and violation of KYC-anti money laundering rules, instances of false compliance reports being submitted by the bank, PPBL’s financial and non-financial business co-mingled with its promoter group companies in violation of licensing conditions, and many other red flags, which pushed the regulator to put stringent curbs on the bank, bringing its operations to a standstill.” 

According to The Indian Express, there were also widespread concerns around data sharing with China-based entities, which first came to light when the RBI barred Paytm Payments Bank from onboarding new customers in March 2022. At the time, Paytm denied all allegations.

Timeline of Paytm Payments Bank’s operations and non-compliance issues

  • August 2015: The RBI gave in-principle approval to Paytm founder Vijay Shekhar Sharma for setting up the Payments Bank.
  • May 2017: Paytm Payments Bank Limited kicked off operations as a payments bank. The RBI issued a licence to the bank under Section 22 (1) of the BR Act to carry on the business of a payments bank in India.
  • January 2018: Paytm Payments Bank rolled out physical RuPay debit cards.
  • February 2019: PPBL launched a zero-balance current account for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) featuring real-time passbook updates and integrated bill payment.
  • October 2021: The central bank imposed a penalty of Rs 1 crore on Paytm Payments Bank for providing false information during the application for a Certificate of Authorisation (CoA).
  • March 2022: The RBI directed Paytm Payments Bank to stop onboarding new customers.
  • November 2022: Paytm’s subsidiary, Paytm Payments Services Limited (PPSL), was barred from onboarding new online merchants to its payment aggregator business.
  • October 2023: The RBI imposed a fine of Rs 5.39 crore on Paytm Payments Bank for non-compliance with the central bank’s Know Your Customer (KYC) directions, licensing guidelines, and cybersecurity framework.
  • January 2024: The Indian Highways Management Company (IHMCL), an arm of the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), barred Paytm Payments Bank from issuing fresh FASTags.
  • January 2024: The RBI barred Paytm Payment Bank from accepting deposits or top- ups in any customer account, prepaid instruments, wallets, FASTags and NCMC cards after February 29, 2024, owing to compliance and material supervisory concerns.
  • April 2026: The RBI scrapped Paytm’s banking licence. The RBI will now wind up the payments bank and approach the High Court for the process.

Also Read:

Post navigation

While Meta is blocking flagged content automatically, they are not restoring the blocked content when they find the takedown isn’t legally valid.