惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
爱范儿
爱范儿
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
I
Intezer
The Cloudflare Blog
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
G
Google Developers Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
D
Docker
AI
AI
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
L
LangChain Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
Security Latest
Security Latest
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
W
WeLiveSecurity
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
P
Proofpoint News Feed
S
Securelist
S
Security Affairs
Project Zero
Project Zero
博客园 - 叶小钗
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
T
Tor Project blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
T
Tenable Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
V
V2EX
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
I
InfoQ
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
H
Hacker News: Front Page
美团技术团队

Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, July 14, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in PAN-OS Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in SimpleHelp Could Allow for Authentication Bypass A Vulnerability in Oracle PeopleSoft PeopleTools Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, June 9, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Check Point Products Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Cisco Products Could Allow for Server-Side Request Forgery Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in NGINX Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange Server Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, May 12, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Apple Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in PAN-OS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in WHM cPanel and WP Squared Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Oracle Quarterly Critical Patches Issued April 21, 2026 A Vulnerability in OpenSSH Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, April 14, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Progress ShareFile Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Apple Products Could Allow for Privilege Escalation A Vulnerability in F5 Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway Could Allow for Memory Overread A Vulnerability in Oracle Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Firefox Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, March 10, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in pac4j-jwt (JwtAuthenticator) Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Android OS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Products Could Allow for Authentication Bypass A Vulnerability in Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, February 10, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in SolarWinds Web Help Desk Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Microsoft Office Could Allow for Security Feature Bypass A Vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, January 13, 2026 A Vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution. A Vulnerability in Cisco AsyncOS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, December 9, 2025 A Vulnerability in React Server Component (RSC) Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in SonicOS Could Allow for Denial of Service (DoS) A Vulnerability in FortiWeb Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, November 11, 2025
Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution
2026-07-02 · via Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER:

2026-066

DATE(S) ISSUED:

07/01/2026

OVERVIEW:

Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Adobe products, the most severe of which could allow for arbitrary code execution.

  • Adobe Campaign Classic is an enterprise-grade marketing automation platform that helps organizations design, automate, and track complex, personalized cross-channel marketing campaigns.
  • Adobe ColdFusion is a commercial rapid web application development platform used to build and deploy dynamic web and mobile applications.

Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could allow for arbitrary code execution in the context of the logged on user. Depending on the privileges associated with the user, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative user rights.

THREAT INTELLIGENCE:

There are currently no reports of these vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild. 

SYSTEMS AFFECTED:

  • Adobe Campaign Classic ACC v7: 7.4.3 build 9396 and earlier
  • ColdFusion 2025 Update 9 and earlier versions
  • ColdFusion 2023 Update 20 and earlier versions

RISK:

Government:

Large and medium government entitiesHIGH

Small governmentMEDIUM

Businesses:

Large and medium business entitiesHIGH

Small business entitiesMEDIUM

TECHNICAL SUMMARY:

Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Adobe products, the most severe of which could allow for arbitrary code execution. Details of these vulnerabilities are as follows: 

Tactic: Execution (TA0002)

Technique: Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203): 

Adobe Campaign Classic:

  • Incorrect Authorization (CVE-2026-48286)

Adobe ColdFusion:

  • Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type (CVE-2026-48276, CVE-2026-48283)
  • Improper Input Validation (CVE-2026-48277, CVE-2026-48281, CVE-2026-48316, CVE-2026-48315)
  • Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') (CVE-2026-48282, CVE-2026-48313, CVE-2026-48314)
  • Cross-site Scripting (Reflected XSS) (CVE-2026-48307)
  • Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CVE-2026-48285)

Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could allow for arbitrary code execution in the context of the logged on user. Depending on the privileges associated with the user, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative user rights.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

We recommend the following actions be taken:

  • Apply the stable channel update provided by Adobe to vulnerable systems immediately after appropriate testing. (M1051: Update Software)
  • Safeguard 7.1: Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process: Establish and maintain a documented vulnerability management process for enterprise assets. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
  • Safeguard 7.2: Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process: Establish and maintain a risk-based remediation strategy documented in a remediation process, with monthly, or more frequent, reviews.
  • Safeguard 7.6: Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Externally-Exposed Enterprise Assets: Perform automated vulnerability scans of externally-exposed enterprise assets using a SCAP-compliant vulnerability scanning tool. Perform scans on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
  • Safeguard 7.7: Remediate Detected Vulnerabilities: Remediate detected vulnerabilities in software through processes and tooling on a monthly, or more frequent, basis, based on the remediation process.
  • Safeguard 16.13: Conduct Application Penetration Testing: Conduct application penetration testing. For critical applications, authenticated penetration testing is better suited to finding business logic vulnerabilities than code scanning and automated security testing. Penetration testing relies on the skill of the tester to manually manipulate an application as an authenticated and unauthenticated user.
  • Safeguard 18.1: Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program: Establish and maintain a penetration testing program appropriate to the size, complexity, and maturity of the enterprise. Penetration testing program characteristics include scope, such as network, web application, Application Programming Interface (API), hosted services, and physical premise controls; frequency; limitations, such as acceptable hours, and excluded attack types; point of contact information; remediation, such as how findings will be routed internally; and retrospective requirements.
  • Safeguard 18.2: Perform Periodic External Penetration Tests: Perform periodic external penetration tests based on program requirements, no less than annually. External penetration testing must include enterprise and environmental reconnaissance to detect exploitable information. Penetration testing requires specialized skills and experience and must be conducted through a qualified party. The testing may be clear box or opaque box.
  • Safeguard 18.3: Remediate Penetration Test Findings: Remediate penetration test findings based on the enterprise’s policy for remediation scope and prioritization.
  • Apply the Principle of Least Privilege to all systems and services. Run all software as a non-privileged user (one without administrative privileges) to diminish the effects of a successful attack. (M1026: Privileged Account Management)
  • Safeguard 4.7: Manage Default Accounts on Enterprise Assets and Software: Manage default accounts on enterprise assets and software, such as root, administrator, and other pre-configured vendor accounts. Example implementations can include: disabling default accounts or making them unusable.
  • Safeguard 5.4: Restrict Administrator Privileges to Dedicated Administrator Accounts: Restrict administrator privileges to dedicated administrator accounts on enterprise assets. Conduct general computing activities, such as internet browsing, email, and productivity suite use, from the user’s primary, non-privileged account.
  • Restrict use of certain websites, block downloads/attachments, block Javascript, restrict browser extensions, etc. (M1021: Restrict Web-Based Content)
  • Safeguard 2.3: Address Unauthorized Software: Ensure that unauthorized software is either removed from use on enterprise assets or receives a documented exception. Review monthly, or more frequently.
  • Safeguard 2.7: Allowlist Authorized Scripts: Use technical controls, such as digital signatures and version control, to ensure that only authorized scripts, such as specific .ps1, .py, etc., files, are allowed to execute. Block unauthorized scripts from executing. Reassess bi-annually, or more frequently.
  • Safeguard 9.3: Maintain and Enforce Network-Based URL Filters: Enforce and update network-based URL filters to limit an enterprise asset from connecting to potentially malicious or unapproved websites. Example implementations include category-based filtering, reputation-based filtering, or through the use of block lists. Enforce filters for all enterprise assets.
  • Safeguard 9.6: Block Unnecessary File Types: Block unnecessary file types attempting to enter the enterprise’s email gateway.
  • Use capabilities to detect and block conditions that may lead to or be indicative of a software exploit occurring. (M1050: Exploit Protection)
  • Safeguard 10.5: Enable Anti-Exploitation Features: Enable anti-exploitation features on enterprise assets and software, where possible, such as Microsoft? Data Execution Prevention (DEP), Windows? Defender Exploit Guard (WDEG), or Apple? System Integrity Protection (SIP) and Gatekeeper™.
  • Block execution of code on a system through application control, and/or script blocking. (M1038: Execution Prevention)
  • Safeguard 2.5: Allowlist Authorized Software: Use technical controls, such as application allowlisting, to ensure that only authorized software can execute or be accessed. Reassess bi-annually, or more frequently.
  • Safeguard 2.6: Allowlist Authorized Libraries: Use technical controls to ensure that only authorized software libraries, such as specific .dll, .ocx, .so, etc., files, are allowed to load into a system process. Block unauthorized libraries from loading into a system process. Reassess bi-annually, or more frequently.
  • Safeguard 2.7: Allowlist Authorized Scripts: Use technical controls, such as digital signatures and version control, to ensure that only authorized scripts, such as specific .ps1, .py, etc., files, are allowed to execute. Block unauthorized scripts from executing. Reassess bi-annually, or more frequently.
  • Use capabilities to prevent suspicious behavior patterns from occurring on endpoint systems. This could include suspicious process, file, API call, etc. behavior. (M1040: Behavior Prevention on Endpoint)
  • Safeguard 13.2: Deploy a Host-Based Intrusion Detection Solution: Deploy a host-based intrusion detection solution on enterprise assets, where appropriate and/or supported.
  • Safeguard 13.7: Deploy a Host-Based Intrusion Prevention Solution: Deploy a host-based intrusion prevention solution on enterprise assets, where appropriate and/or supported. Example implementations include use of an Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) client or host-based IPS agent.

REFERENCES:

Adobe
CVE