惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
量子位
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
Y
Y Combinator Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园_首页
雷峰网
雷峰网
I
InfoQ
罗磊的独立博客
博客园 - 聂微东
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
D
Docker
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
腾讯CDC
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
K
Kaspersky official blog
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
H
Help Net Security
小众软件
小众软件
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
T
Tenable Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
C
Cisco Blogs
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
博客园 - Franky
A
Arctic Wolf
T
Threatpost
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
Security Latest
Security Latest
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
P
Privacy International News Feed
S
Schneier on Security
Latest news
Latest news
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com

Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, July 14, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in PAN-OS Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Oracle PeopleSoft PeopleTools Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, June 9, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Check Point Products Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Cisco Products Could Allow for Server-Side Request Forgery Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in NGINX Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange Server Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, May 12, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Apple Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in PAN-OS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in Apache HTTP Server Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in WHM cPanel and WP Squared Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Oracle Quarterly Critical Patches Issued April 21, 2026 A Vulnerability in OpenSSH Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, April 14, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientEMS Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Progress ShareFile Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Apple Products Could Allow for Privilege Escalation A Vulnerability in F5 Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway Could Allow for Memory Overread A Vulnerability in Oracle Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Firefox Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, March 10, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in pac4j-jwt (JwtAuthenticator) Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Android OS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Products Could Allow for Authentication Bypass A Vulnerability in Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Could Allow for Authentication Bypass Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, February 10, 2026 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in SolarWinds Web Help Desk Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution A Vulnerability in Microsoft Office Could Allow for Security Feature Bypass A Vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Products Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Adobe Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Multiple Vulnerabilities in Fortinet Products Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, January 13, 2026 A Vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution. A Vulnerability in Cisco AsyncOS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, December 9, 2025 A Vulnerability in React Server Component (RSC) Could Allow for Remote Code Execution A Vulnerability in SonicOS Could Allow for Denial of Service (DoS) A Vulnerability in FortiWeb Could Allow for Remote Code Execution Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, November 11, 2025
A Vulnerability in SimpleHelp Could Allow for Authentication Bypass
2026-06-17 · via Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER:

2026-061

DATE(S) ISSUED:

06/16/2026

OVERVIEW:

A vulnerability has been discovered in SimpleHelp, which could allow for authentication bypass. SimpleHelp is a self-hosted remote support, access, and monitoring software used by IT teams, managed service providers (MSPs), and helpdesks. It enables technicians to securely connect to, troubleshoot, and manage client computers and servers. Successful exploitation of the vulnerability could allow unauthenticated attackers to create a new “Technician” account and use it to remote into managed endpoints, execute scripts, install programs; or view, change, or delete data.

THREAT INTELLIGENCE:

There are currently no reports of the vulnerability being exploited in the wild. 

SYSTEMS AFFECTED:

  • SimpleHelp versions prior to v5.5.16 (stable) and (pre-release) v6.0 RC 2

RISK:

Government:

Large and medium government entitiesHIGH

Small governmentHIGH

Businesses:

Large and medium business entitiesHIGH

Small business entitiesHIGH

TECHNICAL SUMMARY:

A vulnerability has been discovered in SimpleHelp, which could allow for authentication bypass. Details of the vulnerability are as follows:

Tactic: Initial Access (TA0001):

Technique: Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190):

  • CVE-2026-48558 is an authentication bypass flaw affecting SimpleHelp deployments configured to use OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication. Remote, unauthenticated attackers can submit forged tokens with arbitrary claims to create new "Technician" accounts, bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA), and gain full access to managed endpoints.
  • The exact conditions that make SimpleHelp vulnerable to this technician creation vector are:
  • OIDC is enabled – at least one OIDC authentication provider is configured on the SimpleHelp server.
  • A TechnicianGroup is associated with the OIDC provider – at least one TechnicianGroup has the OIDC provider enabled for it. This is a prerequisite for any OIDC login to function and is expected to be present in any deployment using OIDC authentication.
  • “Allow group authenticated logins” is enabled on the TechnicianGroup – this setting is found to be enabled in practice with the clients we assessed.

Successful exploitation of the vulnerability could allow unauthenticated attackers to create a new “Technician” account and use it to remote into managed endpoints, execute scripts, install programs; or view, change, or delete data.  

RECOMMENDATIONS:

We recommend the following actions be taken:

  • Apply appropriate updates provided by SimpleHelp or other vendors which use this software to vulnerable systems immediately after appropriate testing. (M1051: Update Software)
  • Safeguard 7.1 : Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process: Establish and maintain a documented vulnerability management process for enterprise assets. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
  • Safeguard 7.2: Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process: Establish and maintain a risk-based remediation strategy documented in a remediation process, with monthly, or more frequent, reviews.
  • Safeguard 7.4: Perform Automated Application Patch Management: Perform application updates on enterprise assets through automated patch management on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
  • Safeguard 7.5 : Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets: Perform automated vulnerability scans of internal enterprise assets on a quarterly, or more frequent, basis. Conduct both authenticated and unauthenticated scans, using a SCAP-compliant vulnerability scanning tool.
  • Safeguard 7.7: Remediate Detected Vulnerabilities: Remediate detected vulnerabilities in software through processes and tooling on a monthly, or more frequent, basis, based on the remediation process.
  • Safeguard 12.1: Ensure Network Infrastructure is Up-to-Date: Ensure network infrastructure is kept up-to-date. Example implementations include running the latest stable release of software and/or using currently supported network-as-a-service (NaaS) offerings. Review software versions monthly, or more frequently, to verify software support.
  • Safeguard 18.1: Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program: Establish and maintain a penetration testing program appropriate to the size, complexity, and maturity of the enterprise. Penetration testing program characteristics include scope, such as network, web application, Application Programming Interface (API), hosted services, and physical premise controls; frequency; limitations, such as acceptable hours, and excluded attack types; point of contact information; remediation, such as how findings will be routed internally; and retrospective requirements.
  • Safeguard 18.2: Perform Periodic External Penetration Tests: Perform periodic external penetration tests based on program requirements, no less than annually. External penetration testing must include enterprise and environmental reconnaissance to detect exploitable information. Penetration testing requires specialized skills and experience and must be conducted through a qualified party. The testing may be clear box or opaque box.
  • Safeguard 18.3: Remediate Penetration Test Findings: Remediate penetration test findings based on the enterprise’s policy for remediation scope and prioritization.
  • Apply the Principle of Least Privilege to all systems and services. Run all software as a non-privileged user (one without administrative privileges) to diminish the effects of a successful attack. (M1026: Privileged Account Management)
  • Safeguard 4.7: Manage Default Accounts on Enterprise Assets and Software: Manage default accounts on enterprise assets and software, such as root, administrator, and other pre-configured vendor accounts. Example implementations can include: disabling default accounts or making them unusable.
  • Safeguard 5.5: Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Service Accounts: Establish and maintain an inventory of service accounts. The inventory, at a minimum, must contain department owner, review date, and purpose. Perform service account reviews to validate that all active accounts are authorized, on a recurring schedule at a minimum quarterly, or more frequently.
  • Vulnerability scanning is used to find potentially exploitable software vulnerabilities to remediate them. (M1016: Vulnerability Scanning)
  • Safeguard 16.13: Conduct Application Penetration Testing: Conduct application penetration testing. For critical applications, authenticated penetration testing is better suited to finding business logic vulnerabilities than code scanning and automated security testing. Penetration testing relies on the skill of the tester to manually manipulate an application as an authenticated and unauthenticated user.
  • Architect sections of the network to isolate critical systems, functions, or resources. Use physical and logical segmentation to prevent access to potentially sensitive systems and information. Use a DMZ to contain any internet-facing services that should not be exposed from the internal network. Configure separate virtual private cloud (VPC) instances to isolate critical cloud systems. (M1030: Network Segmentation)
  • Safeguard 12.2: Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture: Establish and maintain a secure network architecture. A secure network architecture must address segmentation, least privilege, and availability, at a minimum.
  • Use capabilities to detect and block conditions that may lead to or be indicative of a software exploit occurring. (M1050: Exploit Protection)
  • Safeguard 10.5: Enable Anti-Exploitation Features: Enable anti-exploitation features on enterprise assets and software, where possible, such as Microsoft? Data Execution Prevention (DEP), Windows? Defender Exploit Guard (WDEG), or Apple? System Integrity Protection (SIP) and Gatekeeper™.

REFERENCES:

CVE
Horizon3.ai