惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

H
Heimdal Security Blog
小众软件
小众软件
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
罗磊的独立博客
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
A
About on SuperTechFans
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - 聂微东
月光博客
月光博客
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
Project Zero
Project Zero
T
Tor Project blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
博客园 - 叶小钗
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
I
InfoQ
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
AI
AI
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
W
WeLiveSecurity
C
Check Point Blog
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
T
Tenable Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
The Cloudflare Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
美团技术团队
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
GbyAI
GbyAI
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
腾讯CDC
K
Kaspersky official blog

Blog — PlanetScale

Keeping a Postgres queue healthy — PlanetScale Patterns for Postgres Traffic Control — PlanetScale Graceful degradation in Postgres — PlanetScale High memory usage in Postgres is good, actually — PlanetScale Stripe Projects partnership: Provision PlanetScale Postgres and MySQL databases from the Stripe CLI — PlanetScale Enhanced tagging in Postgres Query Insights — PlanetScale Behind the scenes: How Database Traffic Control works — PlanetScale Introducing Database Traffic Control — PlanetScale Scaling Postgres connections with PgBouncer — PlanetScale Drizzle joins PlanetScale — PlanetScale Video Conferencing with Postgres — PlanetScale Faster PlanetScale Postgres connections with Cloudflare Hyperdrive — PlanetScale Introducing the PlanetScale MCP server — PlanetScale Database Transactions — PlanetScale Automating our changelog with Cursor commands — PlanetScale Postgres 18 is now available — PlanetScale Using MotherDuck with PlanetScale — PlanetScale $50 PlanetScale Metal is GA for Postgres — PlanetScale AI-Powered Postgres index suggestions — PlanetScale $5 PlanetScale is live — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 23 — PlanetScale $50 PlanetScale Metal — PlanetScale Report on our investigation of the 2025-10-20 incident in AWS us-east-1 — PlanetScale $5 PlanetScale — PlanetScale Benchmarking Postgres 17 vs 18 — PlanetScale Larger than RAM Vector Indexes for Relational Databases — PlanetScale Partnering with Cloudflare to bring you the fastest globally distributed applications — PlanetScale Processes and Threads — PlanetScale PlanetScale for Postgres is now GA — PlanetScale Postgres High Availability with CDC — PlanetScale Announcing Neki — PlanetScale Caching — PlanetScale The principles of extreme fault tolerance — PlanetScale Announcing PlanetScale for Postgres — PlanetScale Benchmarking Postgres — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 22 — PlanetScale The Real Failure Rate of EBS — PlanetScale IO devices and latency — PlanetScale Announcing PlanetScale Metal — PlanetScale PlanetScale Metal: There’s no replacement for displacement — PlanetScale Upgrading Query Insights to Metal — PlanetScale Automating cherry-picks between OSS and private forks — PlanetScale Database Sharding — PlanetScale Anatomy of a Throttler, part 3 — PlanetScale Introducing sharding on PlanetScale with workflows — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 21 — PlanetScale Announcing the PlanetScale vectors public beta — PlanetScale Anatomy of a Throttler, part 2 — PlanetScale Instant deploy requests — PlanetScale Anatomy of a Throttler, part 1 — PlanetScale Increase IOPS and throughput with sharding — PlanetScale Tracking index usage with Insights — PlanetScale Faster backups with sharding — PlanetScale Building data pipelines with Vitess — PlanetScale The State of Online Schema Migrations in MySQL — PlanetScale Optimizing aggregation in the Vitess query planner — PlanetScale Dealing with large tables — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 20 — PlanetScale Self-managed Vitess vs Managed Vitess with PlanetScale — PlanetScale Achieving data consistency with the consistent lookup Vindex — PlanetScale The MySQL adaptive hash index — PlanetScale Introducing global replica credentials — PlanetScale Profiling memory usage in MySQL — PlanetScale Summer 2023: Fuzzing Vitess at PlanetScale — PlanetScale How PlanetScale makes schema changes — PlanetScale Identifying and profiling problematic MySQL queries — PlanetScale The Problem with Using a UUID Primary Key in MySQL — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 19 — PlanetScale PlanetScale forever — PlanetScale Introducing schema recommendations — PlanetScale Amazon Aurora Pricing: The many surprising costs of running an Aurora database — PlanetScale Three common MySQL database design mistakes — PlanetScale OAuth applications are now available to everyone — PlanetScale Deprecating the Scaler plan — PlanetScale PlanetScale branching vs. Amazon Aurora blue/green deployments — PlanetScale Databases at scale — PlanetScale Considerations for building a database disaster recovery plan — PlanetScale Working with Geospatial Features in MySQL — PlanetScale PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora replication — PlanetScale Introducing the Vantage and PlanetScale integration — PlanetScale MySQL isolation levels and how they work — PlanetScale Introducing the schemadiff command line tool — PlanetScale $ pscale ping — PlanetScale Announcing foreign key constraints support — PlanetScale The challenges of supporting foreign key constraints — PlanetScale What is HTAP? — PlanetScale Introducing Insights Anomalies — PlanetScale Webhook security: a hands-on guide — PlanetScale MySQL replication: Best practices and considerations — PlanetScale A guide to HTML email with Ruby on Rails and Tailwind CSS — PlanetScale Sharding for cost-effective database management — PlanetScale PlanetScale ranks 188th in Deloitte’s top 500 fastest-growing companies — PlanetScale Announcing the Fivetran integration — PlanetScale Introducing webhooks — PlanetScale What is MySQL replication and when should you use it? — PlanetScale Sync user data between Clerk and a PlanetScale MySQL database — PlanetScale Introducing database reports — PlanetScale Distributed caching systems and MySQL — PlanetScale What is MySQL partitioning? — PlanetScale MySQL High Availability: Connection handling and concurrency — PlanetScale
What are the disadvantages of database indexes? — PlanetScale
JD Lien · 2023-02-17 · via Blog — PlanetScale

JD Lien |

If you've worked with databases for a while, you've probably learned that adding indexes can improve performance. This is especially true for large tables when you are querying with JOINs, GROUP BY, WHERE, or ORDER BY clauses.

An index basically works by storing a copy of part of the data in a different order, so that it can be accessed more quickly — kind of like adding a table of contents to a book.

For a more detailed explanation of how indexes work and how you can use them, check out this article: How do database indexes work? If you want to dive even further to indexes, we have 17 videos on indexing that cover everything from how indexes and B+Trees work to knowing where and when to add indexes.

Making good use of indexes can reduce query run time from seconds to milliseconds. The first time you get a performance boost like that, you might feel inclined to add indexes to every column of every table in your database just because you can. But this is not always a good idea, as there can be drawbacks to adding too many secondary indexes.

Note

You should always include a primary index on every table in your database. However, too many secondary indexes can begin to cause issues in some instances. This article covers issues that come with too many secondary indexes.

Downsides of database indexes

Let's go over some of the possible downsides of using too many database secondary indexes.

Additional storage

The first and perhaps most obvious drawback of adding indexes is that they take up additional storage space. The exact amount of space depends on the size of the table and the number of columns in the index, but it's usually a small percentage of the total size of the table. A basic index only needs to store the values of the indexed columns as well as a pointer to the row in the table. So for a column that contains integers, the index will only need to store the integer values. This space will increase if the column contains strings because the index will need to store the string values as well as the length of each string.

This is important to consider if you have large datasets, as adding multiple indexes to a table can quickly use a significant amount of additional storage space.

Slower writes

When you add an index, it has to be updated whenever a row is inserted, updated, or deleted. This means that writes will be slower. Before you add an index, you should consider whether you will be doing a lot of writes to the table and whether or not you can afford to slow down the writes.

As an example, in one application I worked on, doing a bulk insert of about a million records only took around 10-15 seconds without any indexes. Unfortunately, the performance of certain frequently used queries was quite slow, taking a few seconds to run and causing a bad user experience. Adding several indexes for such queries improved the performance significantly, but the bulk insert now takes closer to two minutes. That is a significant difference in write performance, but in this particular case, it was an acceptable trade-off, as the bulk insert is done infrequently and can be done during off-peak hours when the application is not used heavily.

If something like this bulk insert was triggered by users who had to sit and wait for it, then it might be a different story, and I may have weighted the impact of the slower writes differently.

Finding and removing unused indexes

To keep your database efficient, it's important to find and remove any unused indexes. In MySQL, you can use the following query to find indexes that are not being used (replace your_database_name with the name of your database):

SELECT table_name, index_name, non_unique, seq_in_index, column_name, collation, cardinality, sub_part, packed, index_type, comment, index_comment
FROM information_schema.STATISTICS
WHERE table_schema = 'your_database_name'
AND index_name != 'PRIMARY'
AND (cardinality IS NULL OR cardinality = 0)
ORDER BY table_name, index_name, seq_in_index;

This query checks the cardinality of each index, which is the number of unique values in the index. If this value is 0, then the index is not being used.

If you find an unused index, your_index_name, in a table called your_table_name, you could remove it with the following query:

ALTER TABLE your_table_name DROP INDEX your_index_name;

Auditing all indexes in a database

If you have some indexes that are in use, but after reading this article, you think some of the trade-offs may not be worth it, you can audit each of these individually to see if you want to keep or remove them.

To get a list of all indexes for all tables in your database, run:

SELECT * FROM information_schema.statistics;

Now that you've identified all of your indexes, you can use MySQL invisible indexes to determine which ones you may wish to drop.

Using invisible indexes to test dropping an index

One way to test the outcome of dropping an index before actually dropping it is to utilize MySQL's invisible indexes.

(If you prefer video, you can watch our video on invisible indexes.)

With invisible indexes, you can keep the index intact but essentially hide the index from MySQL so that queries do not use the index. This gives you a way to quickly test the impact of removing an index without completely destroying it.

Tip

You can use PlanetScale Insights to quickly see the performance (rows read, rows returned, total time, time per query, etc.) of any query in your database. This is a quick and easy way to test performance before and after making an index invisible.

To make an index invisible, run the following query:

ALTER TABLE your_table_name;
ALTER INDEX your_index_name INVISIBLE;

You can now run any applicable queries to see how performance is impacted. If you realize you still need this index, you can make it visible again with:

ALTER TABLE your_table_name;
ALTER INDEX your_index_name VISIBLE;

Note

With PlanetScale, we don't allow direct DDL on production branches, unless they have safe migrations disabled (not recommended). So, you'll have to go through the deploy request process to test using invisible indexes. However, with our Revert feature, you can simply click the "Revert" button if you decide you want to undo an altered or dropped index and it will be reverted near instantaneously.

When doing this, ensure that you test the performance of any affected queries before and after removing the index to make sure that you are not inadvertently making things worse.

Conclusion

Adding indexes can be a great way to improve performance, but it's important to be aware that they do come with a cost. Every index takes up additsional storage, can slow down write operations, and can complicate the query optimizer's job, so they aren't always guaranteed to improve performance. Ultimately the decision to add indexes should be based on the specific needs of your application and the trade-offs you are willing to make. You should always measure the performance of your queries before and after adding indexes to see if they are actually improving performance, and if you don't seem to be seeing significant improvement for your desired use, then it may be better to leave the indexes out.