惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

H
Heimdal Security Blog
小众软件
小众软件
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
罗磊的独立博客
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
A
About on SuperTechFans
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - 聂微东
月光博客
月光博客
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
Project Zero
Project Zero
T
Tor Project blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
博客园 - 叶小钗
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
I
InfoQ
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
AI
AI
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
W
WeLiveSecurity
C
Check Point Blog
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
T
Tenable Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
The Cloudflare Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
美团技术团队
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
GbyAI
GbyAI
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
腾讯CDC
K
Kaspersky official blog

Blog — PlanetScale

Keeping a Postgres queue healthy — PlanetScale Patterns for Postgres Traffic Control — PlanetScale Graceful degradation in Postgres — PlanetScale High memory usage in Postgres is good, actually — PlanetScale Stripe Projects partnership: Provision PlanetScale Postgres and MySQL databases from the Stripe CLI — PlanetScale Enhanced tagging in Postgres Query Insights — PlanetScale Behind the scenes: How Database Traffic Control works — PlanetScale Introducing Database Traffic Control — PlanetScale Scaling Postgres connections with PgBouncer — PlanetScale Drizzle joins PlanetScale — PlanetScale Video Conferencing with Postgres — PlanetScale Faster PlanetScale Postgres connections with Cloudflare Hyperdrive — PlanetScale Introducing the PlanetScale MCP server — PlanetScale Database Transactions — PlanetScale Automating our changelog with Cursor commands — PlanetScale Postgres 18 is now available — PlanetScale Using MotherDuck with PlanetScale — PlanetScale $50 PlanetScale Metal is GA for Postgres — PlanetScale AI-Powered Postgres index suggestions — PlanetScale $5 PlanetScale is live — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 23 — PlanetScale $50 PlanetScale Metal — PlanetScale Report on our investigation of the 2025-10-20 incident in AWS us-east-1 — PlanetScale $5 PlanetScale — PlanetScale Benchmarking Postgres 17 vs 18 — PlanetScale Larger than RAM Vector Indexes for Relational Databases — PlanetScale Partnering with Cloudflare to bring you the fastest globally distributed applications — PlanetScale Processes and Threads — PlanetScale PlanetScale for Postgres is now GA — PlanetScale Postgres High Availability with CDC — PlanetScale Announcing Neki — PlanetScale Caching — PlanetScale The principles of extreme fault tolerance — PlanetScale Announcing PlanetScale for Postgres — PlanetScale Benchmarking Postgres — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 22 — PlanetScale The Real Failure Rate of EBS — PlanetScale IO devices and latency — PlanetScale Announcing PlanetScale Metal — PlanetScale PlanetScale Metal: There’s no replacement for displacement — PlanetScale Upgrading Query Insights to Metal — PlanetScale Automating cherry-picks between OSS and private forks — PlanetScale Database Sharding — PlanetScale Anatomy of a Throttler, part 3 — PlanetScale Introducing sharding on PlanetScale with workflows — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 21 — PlanetScale Announcing the PlanetScale vectors public beta — PlanetScale Anatomy of a Throttler, part 2 — PlanetScale Instant deploy requests — PlanetScale Anatomy of a Throttler, part 1 — PlanetScale Increase IOPS and throughput with sharding — PlanetScale Tracking index usage with Insights — PlanetScale Faster backups with sharding — PlanetScale Building data pipelines with Vitess — PlanetScale The State of Online Schema Migrations in MySQL — PlanetScale Optimizing aggregation in the Vitess query planner — PlanetScale Dealing with large tables — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 20 — PlanetScale Self-managed Vitess vs Managed Vitess with PlanetScale — PlanetScale Achieving data consistency with the consistent lookup Vindex — PlanetScale The MySQL adaptive hash index — PlanetScale Introducing global replica credentials — PlanetScale Profiling memory usage in MySQL — PlanetScale Summer 2023: Fuzzing Vitess at PlanetScale — PlanetScale How PlanetScale makes schema changes — PlanetScale Identifying and profiling problematic MySQL queries — PlanetScale The Problem with Using a UUID Primary Key in MySQL — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 19 — PlanetScale PlanetScale forever — PlanetScale Introducing schema recommendations — PlanetScale Amazon Aurora Pricing: The many surprising costs of running an Aurora database — PlanetScale Three common MySQL database design mistakes — PlanetScale OAuth applications are now available to everyone — PlanetScale Deprecating the Scaler plan — PlanetScale PlanetScale branching vs. Amazon Aurora blue/green deployments — PlanetScale Databases at scale — PlanetScale Considerations for building a database disaster recovery plan — PlanetScale Working with Geospatial Features in MySQL — PlanetScale PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora replication — PlanetScale Introducing the Vantage and PlanetScale integration — PlanetScale MySQL isolation levels and how they work — PlanetScale Introducing the schemadiff command line tool — PlanetScale $ pscale ping — PlanetScale Announcing foreign key constraints support — PlanetScale The challenges of supporting foreign key constraints — PlanetScale What is HTAP? — PlanetScale Introducing Insights Anomalies — PlanetScale Webhook security: a hands-on guide — PlanetScale MySQL replication: Best practices and considerations — PlanetScale A guide to HTML email with Ruby on Rails and Tailwind CSS — PlanetScale Sharding for cost-effective database management — PlanetScale PlanetScale ranks 188th in Deloitte’s top 500 fastest-growing companies — PlanetScale Announcing the Fivetran integration — PlanetScale Introducing webhooks — PlanetScale What is MySQL replication and when should you use it? — PlanetScale Sync user data between Clerk and a PlanetScale MySQL database — PlanetScale Introducing database reports — PlanetScale Distributed caching systems and MySQL — PlanetScale What is MySQL partitioning? — PlanetScale MySQL High Availability: Connection handling and concurrency — PlanetScale
Gated Deployments: addressing the complexity of schema deployments at scale — PlanetScale
Shlomi Noach · 2022-09-07 · via Blog — PlanetScale

Shlomi Noach |

Today we introduce Gated Schema Deployments, which help us think of schema changes as more of atomic operations, solve the complexity of making changes across a sharded database, and answer one of the most common requests from our users. Let’s first understand what the deployment complexity is.

PlanetScale already offers non-blocking schema changes. You make some schema changes in your development branch, you submit a deployment request, it gets approved, and each change is then applied, non-intrusively, to your production database. Some deployments take mere seconds and some take hours, based on the size of the affected tables and based on the production workload.

The problem begins with multi-dimensional deployments. With these, you will either have multiple schema changes in the same deployment, or have a single change deployed over a multi-sharded database, or both.

The multi-change dimension

A schema deployment may contain multiple changes. Those will often correlate to each other. E.g., a new table is added, and a new column is added in an existing table, that refers to the PRIMARY KEY column of the new table. Or, maybe a new type of data is added (e.g., a location), that applies to many tables, and so multiple tables are modified.

The common practice to deploy multiple changes is to run them one at a time. A CREATE TABLE is a simple and lightweight enough of an operation, but an ALTER TABLE change is frequently heavyweight, and running multiple of those in parallel can hog your database. But running one migration at a time also creates a bit of discrepancy. Some of your changes may have been applied, some not. And should anything go wrong in the duration of the deployment, you’re left with a half-baked change.

With Gated Deployments, PlanetScale applies all changes as closely as possible, seconds apart from each other. In order to do that, it may run some migrations in parallel, but without exhausting database resources. Consider two ALTER TABLE changes over two large tables. The bulk work is copying over the existing table data, which is done sequentially per table. But tailing the changelog and applying the ongoing changes can be done in parallel.

We run as much of the bulk work as possible upfront, sequentially, and then run the more lightweight work in parallel. We thus maintain multiple schema changes at once, ongoing. Once all changes are in good shape, we complete the migrations as closely as possible. While not strictly atomically, the deployment can be considered more atomic; up till the final stage, no change is reflected in production. In fact, the deployment may be canceled at any point up until its completion time.

The multi-shard dimension

As your database scales, you want to address a new, multi-sharded dimension. By design, a multi-sharded database acts as though it were a monolith, and yet the shards are independent of each other. This has important benefits such as resource allocation or minimization of the blast radius when anything goes wrong. But it also raises new challenges: how do you keep the schema in sync across shards?

Different shards work under different workloads, and may run a schema migration to completion minutes to possibly hours apart. A multi-sharded database where different shards have different schemas can be either inconsistent in performance, or outright inconsistent in design.

Our gated deployments minimize that gap period, by tracking the progress of a schema deployment across all shards and holding off the final switch to the new schema until all shards are ready. The switch then takes place almost simultaneously (though not atomically) on all shards.

Solving the most requested schema revert feature: controlled gated deployments

PlanetScale offers a powerful flow: the ability to revert a deployment. A way to revert to the previous schema, but without losing any data accumulated in the interim. When a deployment completes, PlanetScale offers a 30 minute window in which it’s possible to revert, if needed.

The most common questions around our schema revert feature revolves about that time limit: “why 30 minutes?”, “What happens if the deployment completes at 2:00am over the weekend, and I can’t access my laptop in time?”, “Can we have better control over the timings?”

Responding to these questions, Gated Deployments now allow users to choose the deployment completion time at their discretion. By default, deployments auto-complete when ready, and this is great for most cases, and clears up the deployment queue. However, if the user so chooses, they may uncheck the "Auto-apply" box.

PlanetScale deploy request showing auto-apply changes checkbox

The deployment now stages all changes and runs all long-running tasks. When all changes are ready, the deployment awaits the user to hit the "Apply changes" button. With no input from the user, the deployment will just keep on running in the background, always keeping up to date with data changes.

PlanetScale dashboard UI showing a completed migration that’s ready to merge once the "Apply changes" button is clicked.

For example, a deployment with three ALTER statements over large tables may take a day to run. It may be 2:00am on the weekend when it finally completes the hard work of copying the dataset. But it won’t apply the changes: the deployment will just keep on syncing and responding to ongoing changes like any INSERT, DELETE or UPDATE on the relevant tables. Come Monday morning, when the developer is at their desk and fully prepared to begin their work week, they may click the “Apply changes” button. The deployment then completes, and the 30 minute window for schema reverts starts ticking, all while the developer is in control of the situation.

Try it out

This release of Gated Deployments brings us another step closer to our goal of a more modern and cohesive development flow, where schema changes happen alongside application development, not in isolation.