惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

H
Heimdal Security Blog
小众软件
小众软件
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
罗磊的独立博客
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
A
About on SuperTechFans
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - 聂微东
月光博客
月光博客
Cyberwarzone
Cyberwarzone
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
Project Zero
Project Zero
T
Tor Project blog
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
博客园 - 叶小钗
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
I
InfoQ
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
AI
AI
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
W
WeLiveSecurity
C
Check Point Blog
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
T
Tenable Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
The Cloudflare Blog
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
美团技术团队
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
GbyAI
GbyAI
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
腾讯CDC
K
Kaspersky official blog

Blog — PlanetScale

Keeping a Postgres queue healthy — PlanetScale Patterns for Postgres Traffic Control — PlanetScale Graceful degradation in Postgres — PlanetScale High memory usage in Postgres is good, actually — PlanetScale Stripe Projects partnership: Provision PlanetScale Postgres and MySQL databases from the Stripe CLI — PlanetScale Enhanced tagging in Postgres Query Insights — PlanetScale Behind the scenes: How Database Traffic Control works — PlanetScale Introducing Database Traffic Control — PlanetScale Scaling Postgres connections with PgBouncer — PlanetScale Drizzle joins PlanetScale — PlanetScale Video Conferencing with Postgres — PlanetScale Faster PlanetScale Postgres connections with Cloudflare Hyperdrive — PlanetScale Introducing the PlanetScale MCP server — PlanetScale Database Transactions — PlanetScale Automating our changelog with Cursor commands — PlanetScale Postgres 18 is now available — PlanetScale Using MotherDuck with PlanetScale — PlanetScale $50 PlanetScale Metal is GA for Postgres — PlanetScale AI-Powered Postgres index suggestions — PlanetScale $5 PlanetScale is live — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 23 — PlanetScale $50 PlanetScale Metal — PlanetScale Report on our investigation of the 2025-10-20 incident in AWS us-east-1 — PlanetScale $5 PlanetScale — PlanetScale Benchmarking Postgres 17 vs 18 — PlanetScale Larger than RAM Vector Indexes for Relational Databases — PlanetScale Partnering with Cloudflare to bring you the fastest globally distributed applications — PlanetScale Processes and Threads — PlanetScale PlanetScale for Postgres is now GA — PlanetScale Postgres High Availability with CDC — PlanetScale Announcing Neki — PlanetScale Caching — PlanetScale The principles of extreme fault tolerance — PlanetScale Announcing PlanetScale for Postgres — PlanetScale Benchmarking Postgres — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 22 — PlanetScale The Real Failure Rate of EBS — PlanetScale IO devices and latency — PlanetScale Announcing PlanetScale Metal — PlanetScale PlanetScale Metal: There’s no replacement for displacement — PlanetScale Upgrading Query Insights to Metal — PlanetScale Automating cherry-picks between OSS and private forks — PlanetScale Database Sharding — PlanetScale Anatomy of a Throttler, part 3 — PlanetScale Introducing sharding on PlanetScale with workflows — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 21 — PlanetScale Announcing the PlanetScale vectors public beta — PlanetScale Anatomy of a Throttler, part 2 — PlanetScale Instant deploy requests — PlanetScale Anatomy of a Throttler, part 1 — PlanetScale Increase IOPS and throughput with sharding — PlanetScale Tracking index usage with Insights — PlanetScale Faster backups with sharding — PlanetScale Building data pipelines with Vitess — PlanetScale The State of Online Schema Migrations in MySQL — PlanetScale Optimizing aggregation in the Vitess query planner — PlanetScale Dealing with large tables — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 20 — PlanetScale Self-managed Vitess vs Managed Vitess with PlanetScale — PlanetScale Achieving data consistency with the consistent lookup Vindex — PlanetScale The MySQL adaptive hash index — PlanetScale Introducing global replica credentials — PlanetScale Profiling memory usage in MySQL — PlanetScale Summer 2023: Fuzzing Vitess at PlanetScale — PlanetScale How PlanetScale makes schema changes — PlanetScale Identifying and profiling problematic MySQL queries — PlanetScale The Problem with Using a UUID Primary Key in MySQL — PlanetScale Announcing Vitess 19 — PlanetScale PlanetScale forever — PlanetScale Introducing schema recommendations — PlanetScale Amazon Aurora Pricing: The many surprising costs of running an Aurora database — PlanetScale Three common MySQL database design mistakes — PlanetScale OAuth applications are now available to everyone — PlanetScale Deprecating the Scaler plan — PlanetScale PlanetScale branching vs. Amazon Aurora blue/green deployments — PlanetScale Databases at scale — PlanetScale Considerations for building a database disaster recovery plan — PlanetScale Working with Geospatial Features in MySQL — PlanetScale PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora replication — PlanetScale Introducing the Vantage and PlanetScale integration — PlanetScale MySQL isolation levels and how they work — PlanetScale Introducing the schemadiff command line tool — PlanetScale $ pscale ping — PlanetScale Announcing foreign key constraints support — PlanetScale The challenges of supporting foreign key constraints — PlanetScale What is HTAP? — PlanetScale Introducing Insights Anomalies — PlanetScale Webhook security: a hands-on guide — PlanetScale MySQL replication: Best practices and considerations — PlanetScale A guide to HTML email with Ruby on Rails and Tailwind CSS — PlanetScale Sharding for cost-effective database management — PlanetScale PlanetScale ranks 188th in Deloitte’s top 500 fastest-growing companies — PlanetScale Announcing the Fivetran integration — PlanetScale Introducing webhooks — PlanetScale What is MySQL replication and when should you use it? — PlanetScale Sync user data between Clerk and a PlanetScale MySQL database — PlanetScale Introducing database reports — PlanetScale Distributed caching systems and MySQL — PlanetScale What is MySQL partitioning? — PlanetScale MySQL High Availability: Connection handling and concurrency — PlanetScale
One million connections — PlanetScale
Liz van Dijk · 2022-11-01 · via Blog — PlanetScale

Liz van Dijk |

A powerful feature of serverless computing architecture is the ability to design and horizontally scale individual components of your stack, allowing more computing resources to be allocated on the fly to be used only when you need them. Databases are an essential part of the serverless stack, but people using serverless functions are finding an all too common problem with databases: connection limits. Users are forced to use proxies such as pgbouncer to handle even small workloads. With MySQL, the dreaded “Too many connections” error rings all too familiar for developers who are seeing a sudden surge in users.

A standalone database relies heavily on its ability to compartmentalize memory use to provide the strong isolation guarantees we expect, so it needs to allocate certain memory buffers on a per-connection basis. The more connections we create, the less memory we have available for the overall buffer pool, and so MySQL comes with a max_connections variable built in that acts as a “last resort” safety measure. This setting stops new connections from being established after the configured point, and it’s critical to avoid situations like an unexpected Denial of Service attack causing a memory-related outage on the database level. While it may seem harmless to raise this variable at first (you may not be approaching the instance memory limits quite yet), making MySQL live outside its means (i.e. overcommitting memory) opens the door to dangerous crashes and potential downtime, so this is not recommended.

Application connection pools

Now, establishing and cleaning up connections also takes time and computing resources, so many development frameworks offer built-in functionality like connection pools. Connection pools allow a bulk amount of connections to be established up front and for the application to queue up its database requests on that side. While that works really well as both a performance optimization and safety feature for the database side, application-side connection pools become a similarly challenging area when trying to scale a serverless stack.

PlanetScale connection pooling

To both safeguard and optimize connection management for MySQL, Vitess and PlanetScale offer connection pooling on the VTTablet level. This scales alongside your cluster, and also allows for connection requests to be queued up there when a sudden application scale-up starts sending queries from a very large amount of horizontally spawned processes. This keeps the underlying MySQL processes safe from a memory management standpoint, and allows you to keep adding workers as needed to scale the application.

In addition to that, PlanetScale’s Global Routing Infrastructure provides another horizontally scalable layer of connectivity, which we put to the test recently to help us prepare for the broader rollout of our serverless driver.

PlanetScale Connectivity Infrastructure diagram

One million MySQL connections

This combination of Vitess connection pooling and the PlanetScale Global Routing Infrastructure enables us to maintain nearly limitless connections. We decided to put this to the test by running one million active connections on a PlanetScale database. Keeping with our “One million” blog theme, the target itself should be considered no more than an arbitrary number. After all, our architecture is designed to keep scaling horizontally beyond that point. However, it’s high enough to serve most of our users’ needs and illustrates the capabilities of the architecture.

To isolate our connection layer, we devised a test environment that makes use of AWS Lambda, using a fan-out pattern to run a simple Go executable that uses the go-sql-driver to establish a number of parallel connections.

Interesting fact we ran into here: by default, the Lambda runtime environment has a hard open_files limit of 1024 and a function concurrency limit of 1000. As such, we configured our test to run a total of exactly 1000 “worker functions”, each of which established exactly 1000 connections, so we could stay within the Lambda runtime limits.

Each worker loop executes the following:

  • Opens a new connection to MySQL
  • Once established, sends a simple query to verify we can talk to the underlying database.
  • Waits for the other loops to finish creating their connections.

Once we reach the desired concurrency, all workers are instructed to wait an extra few minutes with an open connection before closing out, so we can easily observe the stable parallelism in monitoring. We were able to scale up to maintain a total of one million open connections in under two minutes.

Graph showing total open connections rising from 0 to one million in 2 minutes, holding steady for 5 minutes, and dropping back down to 0

The PlanetScale Global Routing Infrastructure is ready for your serverless function workloads. Sign up to try it out yourself, or reach out to talk to us if you’d like to learn how to make our scalability work for your application.