惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
A
About on SuperTechFans
小众软件
小众软件
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - 叶小钗
博客园 - 聂微东
博客园 - Franky
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
罗磊的独立博客
量子位
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
GbyAI
GbyAI
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
B
Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

Lauren Weinstein's Blog

Big Tech’s Catastrophic Layoffs Frenzy – Lauren Weinstein's Blog The Rise of AI Slop on Google’s YouTube – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Why Google Search AI Overviews Are a “Misinformation Machine” – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Why Apple’s New “MacBook Neo” Has Stunned the Tech World – Lauren Weinstein's Blog When Data Centers Destroy Communities – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Why You Shouldn’t Use Google’s Chrome “Auto Browse” Agentic AI, or Any Other Agentic AI From Other Firms – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Why Proposed “Blocking Technologies” for 3D Printers Are a Terrible Idea – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Cheerful, Cooperative, and Usually, Wrong. – Lauren Weinstein's Blog The World Gets an Important New Drone That Can Save Lives — But Thanks to Our Politicians Not in the USA – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Separating the Chrome Browser From Google Could Be Terrible for Billions of Users – Lauren Weinstein's Blog In the War Between the Federal Government and States Against Drone Maker DJI, Americans Are at Risk – Lauren Weinstein's Blog The Website Age Verification Train Wreck – Lauren Weinstein's Blog How the U.S. Is Losing Its Lead in Technology and Science Research – Lauren Weinstein's Blog The Enormous Negative Impacts of the New Tariffs on the Technology Sector – Lauren Weinstein's Blog DOGE Is Destroying Social Security, and Seniors Are Already at Risk – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Time To Change Section 230? – Lauren Weinstein's Blog The Helpful Google Ombudsman (Who Doesn’t Exist) – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Commerce Department Proposes Yet Another Insane Chinese Drone Ban That Could Cost Lives – Lauren Weinstein's Blog AI Is Dooming Google, but Not in the Way Its CEO Believes – Lauren Weinstein's Blog [What say you, Spock?] My Proposed Terminology to Describe Bypassing Social Media Face ID Age Verification Systems – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Drone Hysteria and Bans Put Lives at Risk – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Is Doomed – Lauren Weinstein's Blog DOJ’s Proposed Antitrust “Remedies” Against Google Would Be a Disaster – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Users have the most to lose – Lauren Weinstein's Blog “I Am the Very Model of a Google AI Overview” – Lauren Weinstein's Blog What Google Should Do About Their Search Generative AI Overview Answers – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Generative AI Is Being Rammed Down Our Throats – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Evil – Lauren Weinstein's Blog The Nightmare of Google Account Recovery Failures – Lauren Weinstein's Blog Google and Seniors – Lauren Weinstein's Blog
How to Fix Google’s Gmail Political Spam Bypass Plan – La...
2022-08-04 · via Lauren Weinstein's Blog

UPDATE (25 January 2023): Google has announced that it will terminate this program at the end of this month (31 January 2023).

– – – – – –

Recently in Google’s Horrible Plan to Flood Your Gmail with Political Garbage I discussed Google’s plan to permit “official” political emails to bypass Gmail spam filters, with users able to opt-out from this bypass only on a sender-by-sender basis as political emails arrive. So as new “official” political senders proliferate, this will be a continuing unwanted exercise for most Gmail users.

The Federal Election Commission has now posted a draft decision that effectively gives Google a go ahead for this plan (UPDATE: 11 August 2022: The FEC has now officially approved the plan). The large number of comments received by the FEC regarding this proposal were overwhelmingly negative (it was difficult to find any positive comments at all), but the FEC is only ruling on the technical question of whether such a plan would represent prohibited in-kind political contributions.

My view is that Gmail users should be able to opt-out of this entire political spam bypass plan if that is their choice. Political emails would in that case continue going into those individual users’ spam folders to the same extent that they do now.

My specific recommendation:

The first time that a political email arrives for a Gmail user that would bypass spam filtering under the Google plan, the Gmail user would be presented with a modal query with words to this effect (and yes, wording this properly will be nontrivial):

Do you want official political emails to arrive in your Gmail inbox rather than any of them going to your spam folder, unless you indicate otherwise regarding specific political email senders? You can change this choice at any time in Gmail Settings.
(TELL ME MORE)
YES
NO

There is no “default” answer to this query. Users must choose either YES or NO to proceed (with the TELL ME MORE choice branching off to an explanatory help page).

This is a matter of showing respect to Gmail users. The political parties do not own Gmail users’ inboxes, but users who are concerned about missing political emails that might otherwise go to the spam folder would be able to participate in this program, while other users would not be forced into participation against their wills.

Of course this will not satisfy some politicians who incorrectly assume that so much political email ends up in spam due to a claimed political bias against them by Google. In fact, Google applies no political bias at all to Gmail — so much political email ends up in spam precisely because that’s where most Gmail users want it to be.

Google is between the proverbial rock and a hard place on this matter, but I’m asking Google to side with their users. I’d prefer that the Gmail political spam bypass plan not be deployed at all, but if it’s going to happen than let’s give Google’s users a choice to participate or not, right up front.

It’s the Googley thing to do.

–Lauren–